Literature DB >> 34104575

Preventing a Post-Pandemic Double Burden of Disease in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Amy Hai Yan Chan1, Rob Horne2.   

Abstract

As the world focuses on containing the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and limiting the effects of the pandemic on the global population, care must be taken not to lose sight of existing individual health issues. There is a real risk of creating a 'post-pandemic double burden of disease'- where the pressures of having to manage acute COVID-19-related impacts on the health system are added to the existing burden of chronic non-communicable diseases or long-term conditions in developed countries. This could create a post-pandemic health crisis by devoting less attention to existing health conditions. A growing evidence base from other epidemics and health emergencies highlight the potential negative impact of short-term health crises on long-term public health. The significant disruptions to the usual healthcare systems and society can lead to increased morbidity and mortality in the long-term if not managed appropriately. This viewpoint provides an overview of the evidence to support the management of long-term conditions during, and after, health emergencies, to limit the impact of COVID-19 on public health in the short- and long-term.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; double burden of disease; health care; long-term conditions; post-pandemic; public health

Year:  2021        PMID: 34104575      PMCID: PMC8172331          DOI: 10.1177/21649561211010137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med        ISSN: 2164-9561


Introduction

As the world focuses on containing the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and limiting the effects of the pandemic on the global population, care must be taken not to lose sight of existing individual health issues. There is a real risk of creating a ‘post-pandemic double burden of disease’ – where the pressures of having to manage acute COVID-19-related impacts on the health system are added to the existing burden of chronic non-communicable diseases or long-term conditions (LTCs) in developed countries. This could create a post-pandemic health crisis by devoting less attention to existing health conditions. During a pandemic, there are significant disruptions to the usual healthcare systems and the way society functions, as resources are diverted to focus on immediate pandemic-related events and restrictive measures such as region- or country-wide lockdowns are put in place. In the face of a health emergency such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, it is easy to neglect the management of more ‘routine’ health conditions, both at an individual and societal level.

Management of Long-term Conditions at the Individual Level

For individuals, the key messaging they have received from government bodies and global health organisations is to ‘stay home’ and ensure social distancing and hand hygiene. Usual healthcare interventions to promote healthy living and optimise self-management of long-term health conditions (LTCs) have understandably taken a lower priority to COVID-19 management. Yet evidence shows that ongoing optimal management of LTCs remains of utmost importance, regardless of the situation. People with pre-existing LTCs are at a greater risk of having worse outcomes or more severe disease if infected with the coronavirus. Moreover, COVID-19 outcomes are affected by how well the individual has managed their LTCs. For example, previous data from other pandemics suggest that uncontrolled glycaemia is a significant predictor of disease severity and death and high fasting plasma glucose is an independent predictor of diabetes. Although current data in this field are limited, data that does exist support giving LTCs almost equal attention to acute pandemic responses, since suboptimal management of existing LTCs may lead to poorer outcomes. Supporting patients to self-manage LTCs is arguably more important during the COVID-19 pandemic than it was before. This is necessary in the short term to minimise the effect of poorer COVID-19 outcomes among those with pre-existing LTCs and to avoid the knock-on effects of sub-optimal self-management on future health. At an individual level, patients with LTCs should continue to receive the support necessary to maintain their motivation and ability to continue to manage their condition effectively. Disruptions to daily routines and new competing demands on an individual’s time (e.g. changes to accommodate work-from-home arrangements and managing family/childcare commitments) can reduce their motivation and ability to self-manage LTCs. Usual medicine-taking routines may be interrupted, which can lead to poorer medicines adherence, or complete discontinuation of medicines. Conditions that require regular self-monitoring such as blood glucose testing in diabetes, peak flow monitoring in asthma, and daily weighing in congestive heart failure may be compromised, as well as the ability to undertake activities that promote general health and wellbeing such as exercise and healthy diets. These disruptions can translate to increases in stress which in itself can lead to adverse health outcomes, particularly negative impacts on cardiovascular health.

Management of Long-term Conditions at the Societal Level

Beyond direct COVID-19-related risks, the societal disruptions arising from pandemics can adversely affect the outcomes of LTCs.[10,11] Crises disrupt routine management of health conditions at all levels. At a societal level, when countries transition to and from periods of lockdown, healthcare is less accessible for many. Health resources are redistributed to focus on acute pandemic response with a reduced capacity to deliver routine care due to service closures or reduced hours, and fewer staffing. There may be disparities between population subgroups in their ability to adapt to new models of care delivery, for example differences in ability to engage with online or remote health consultations ; filling electronic prescriptions; accessing home delivery of medicines. This could contribute to widening health gaps and inequities between communities, and worsen existing disparities in vulnerable or minority populations, as it impacts on access to both health consultations and medicines supply. Even when healthcare services are available, individuals may avoid or delay using required health services due to fears of infection from visiting health practitioners, concerns about burdening a stretched health system, or personal beliefs that their health issues are ‘trivial’ compared with COVID-19 related issues. Evidence from studies of population health status after natural disasters suggest that some LTCs – particularly cardiovascular conditions, and diabetes – are worsened after major crises. Computational models using data from the Ebola outbreak in 2014-2015 estimates that a 50% reduction in access to healthcare services led to over 10,000 additional deaths. How relevant these data are to population health after this current pandemic needs further exploration; early evidence suggests the effects of the pandemic are likely to lead to increases in metabolic and mental health conditions[7,20] as a consequence of the self-isolation and lockdown measures if preventive actions are not taken now.

Conclusion

As countries transition between periods of full lockdown and measures with fewer restrictions, there is an urgent need to refocus health care priorities to ensure essential health services are maintained and ongoing management of LTCs are supported, so communities stay well in the post-pandemic phase. This is particularly important when health systems begin to resume usual services, so that healthcare systems in developed countries are not overwhelmed with a double burden of disease from COVID-19-related events and from managing the consequences of LTCs that have been neglected during the pandemic.
  15 in total

1.  Covid-19 and Health Care's Digital Revolution.

Authors:  Sirina Keesara; Andrea Jonas; Kevin Schulman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Working together to contain and manage COVID-19.

Authors:  Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  COVID-19 outbreak measures may indirectly lead to greater burden on hospitals.

Authors:  George A Heckman; Margaret Saari; Caitlin McArthur; Nathalie I H Wellens; John P Hirdes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Effect of Hurricane Katrina on the incidence of acute coronary syndrome at a primary angioplasty center in New Orleans.

Authors:  Sandeep Gautam; Jonathan Menachem; Sudesh K Srivastav; Patrice Delafontaine; Anand Irimpen
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.385

5.  Health risks and potential remedies during prolonged lockdowns for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Brandon M Henry; Chiara Bovo; Fabian Sanchis-Gomar
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2020-05-26

6.  The novel coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public health consequences by media exposure.

Authors:  Dana Rose Garfin; Roxane Cohen Silver; E Alison Holman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Delayed access or provision of care in Italy resulting from fear of COVID-19.

Authors:  Marzia Lazzerini; Egidio Barbi; Andrea Apicella; Federico Marchetti; Fabio Cardinale; Gianluca Trobia
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-04-09

8.  Rapid Assessment of Ebola-Related Implications for Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Service Delivery and Utilization in Guinea.

Authors:  Janine Barden-O'Fallon; Mamadou Alimou Barry; Paul Brodish; Jack Hazerjian
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2015-08-04

Review 9.  COVID-19 and diabetes: Knowledge in progress.

Authors:  Akhtar Hussain; Bishwajit Bhowmik; Nayla Cristina do Vale Moreira
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 8.180

10.  Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Wen-Hua Liang; Yi Zhao; Heng-Rui Liang; Zi-Sheng Chen; Yi-Min Li; Xiao-Qing Liu; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Chun-Quan Ou; Li Li; Ping-Yan Chen; Ling Sang; Wei Wang; Jian-Fu Li; Cai-Chen Li; Li-Min Ou; Bo Cheng; Shan Xiong; Zheng-Yi Ni; Jie Xiang; Yu Hu; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Lin-Ling Cheng; Feng Ye; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Ping Zheng; Nuo-Fu Zhang; Nan-Shan Zhong; Jian-Xing He
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 16.671

View more
  2 in total

1.  Person-Centered Healthcare Practice in a Pandemic Context: An Exploration of People's Experience of Seeking Healthcare Support.

Authors:  Eleanor Curnow; Vaibhav Tyagi; Lisa Salisbury; Kim Stuart; Barbara Melville-Jóhannesson; Kath Nicol; Brendan McCormack; Jan Dewing; Ruth Magowan; Olivia Sagan; Cathy Bulley
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-09-01

2.  Support after COVID-19 study: a mixed-methods cross-sectional study to develop recommendations for practice.

Authors:  Cathy Bulley; Vaibhav Tyagi; Eleanor Curnow; Kath Nicol; Lisa Salisbury; Kim Stuart; Brendan McCormack; Ruth Magowan; Olivia Sagan; Jan Dewing
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.006

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.