| Literature DB >> 34104292 |
Michael Owusu1,2,3, Augustina Angelina Sylverken2,4, Philip El-Duah5, Godfred Acheampong3, Mohammed Mutocheluh6, Yaw Adu-Sarkodie6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: acute respiratory tract infections (ARIs) are responsible for significant proportions of illnesses and deaths annually. Most of ARIs are of viral etiology, with human coronaviruses (HCoVs) playing a key role. This study was conducted prior to the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) to provide evidence about the sero-epidemiology of HCoVs in rural areas of Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Ghana; HCoVs; Human coronaviruses; SARS-CoV-2; immunofluorescent assay
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34104292 PMCID: PMC8164429 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.244.26110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Figure 1geographical locations of study areas in Ghana
Figure 2HCoV controls examined with X10 objective lens; images A and B show the positive controls (1:40 dilution) stained for immunofluorescence antibodies against patients infected with HCoV-OC43 and rabbit infected HCoV-NL63, respectively
Figure 3HCoV controls examined with X10 objective lens; A) the positive control (1:40 dilution) stained for immunofluorescence antibodies against patients infected with HCoV-229E; B) image of a negative control from rabbit not immunized against HCoVs
Figure 4HCoV samples examined with X20 objective lens; images A and B show examples of positive images (1:40 dilution) stained for immunofluorescence antibodies against patients infected with HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E, respectively
Figure 5HCoV samples examined with X20 objective lens; image A shows an example of positive image (1:40 dilution) stained for immunofluorescence antibodies against patients infected with HCoV-NL63; B) image of a patient negative for all three viruses
association between demographic factors and HCoVs sero-positivity
| HCoV-NL63 | HCoV-OC43 | HCoV-229E | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | P-value | Negative | Positive | P-value | Negative | Positive | P-value | |
| n = 185 | n = 16 | n = 166 | n = 35 | n = 155 | n = 46 | ||||
| 0.08 | 0.113 | 0.238 | |||||||
| Buoyem n (%) | 49 (26.5) | 3 (18.8) | 46 (27.7) | 6 (17.1) | 41 (26.5) | 11 (23.9) | |||
| Forikrom n (%) | 61 (33) | 2 (12.5) | 47 (28.3) | 16 (45.7) | 44 (28.4) | 19 (41.3) | |||
| Kwamang n (%) | 75 (40.5) | 11 (68.8) | 73 (44) | 13 (37.1) | 70 (45.2) | 16 (34.8) | |||
| 35 (21.5-52) | 33 (19-50) | 0.994 | 30 (19-46.2) | 47 (33-52.5) | 30 (19-47.5) | 40 (27-54) | |||
| 0.386 | 0.195 | 0.447 | |||||||
| Females n (%) | 105 (58.3) | 7 (43.8) | 97 (59.5) | 15 (45.5) | 89 (58.9) | 23 (51.1) | |||
| Males n (%) | 75 (41.7) | 9 (56.2) | 66 (40.5) | 18 (54.5) | 62 (41.1) | 22 (48.9) | |||
| 0.65 | 0.711 | 0.163 | |||||||
| A Rh “D” Negative n (%) | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.3) | |||
| A Rh “D” Positive n (%) | 31 (19) | 3 (21.4) | 25 (17.1) | 9 (0) | 27 (20.3) | 7 (15.9) | |||
| B Rh “D” Positive n (%) | 53 (32.5) | 5 (35.7) | 48 (32.9) | 10 (32.3) | 47 (35.3) | 11 (25) | |||
| B Rh “D” Negative n (%) | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0) | |||
| AB Rh “D” Positive n (%) | 3 (1.8) | 1 (7.1) | 4 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 4 (3) | 0 (0) | |||
| AB Rh “D” Negative n (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| O Rh “D” Positive n (%) | 68 (41.7) | 5 (35.7) | 62 (42.5) | 11 (35.5) | 51 (38.3) | 22 (50) | |||
| O Rh “D” Negative n (%) | 6 (3.7) | 0 (0) | 5 (3.4) | 1 (3.2) | 3 (2.3) | 3 (6.8) | |||