| Literature DB >> 34104131 |
Gustavo Vieira de Oliveira1, Mônica Volino-Souza1, Renata Leitão1, Vivian Pinheiro1, Carlos Adam Conte-Júnior1, Thiago Silveira Alvares1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a spectrum of possibilities for analyzing muscle O2 resaturation parameters for measurement of reactive hyperemia in microvasculature. However, there is no consensus with respect to the responsiveness of these O2 resaturation parameters for assessing reactive hyperemia.Entities:
Keywords: aging; capillary endothelial cells; cardiovascular physiology; hypertension; vascular disease
Year: 2021 PMID: 34104131 PMCID: PMC8153062 DOI: 10.1590/1677-5449.200143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vasc Bras ISSN: 1677-5449
Figure 1Cuff and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) probe on skin overlying forearm flexor muscles. Note that in the picture the NIRS probe is shown without the black vinyl sheet and the elastic tensor band that cover it, for the purposes of illustrating the probe location in the image.
Figure 2Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived tissue O2 saturation (StO2) signal analysis during cuff deflation phase (reperfusion). (A) The lowest StO2 value reached during cuff inflation (StO2min) and the highest StO2 value reached following cuff deflation (StO2max); (B) time for the StO2 signal to reach the peak after cuff release (time to StO2max); (C) time for the StO2 signal to reach the pre-occlusion baseline values after cuff release (time to StO2base); (D) difference between the StO2min and StO2max after cuff deflation (ΔStO2reperfusion); (E) area under the reperfusion curve (AUC) above the baseline (StO2AUCabove_base); (F) the total AUC over 2 minutes of reperfusion (StO2AUCt); (G) upslope of StO2 signal over a 10 s reperfusion window immediately following cuff deflation (StO2slope_10s); (H) upslope of StO2 signal over a 30 s reperfusion window immediately following cuff deflation (StO2slope_30s); and (I) upslope of StO2 signal over the time elapsed between StO2min and pre-occlusion baseline StO2 values.
Baseline characteristics of the participants.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 23 | 29 | 35 |
| Male/female | 14/9 | 13/16 | 14/21 |
| Age (years) | 28.4 ± 5.9 | 67.6 ± 5.8 | 68.4 ± 8.2 |
| Weight (kg) | 74.8 ± 9.3 | 77.9 ± 13.8 | 72.6 ± 11.2 |
| Height (cm) | 171.8 ± 0.1 | 168.4 ± 0.8 | 169.5 ± 0.6 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 25.2 ± 1.8 | 30.1 ± 4.1* | 30.1 ± 8.8* |
| Forearm skin fold thickness (mm) | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 2.3 ± 0.6 | 2.3 ± 0.8 |
|
| |||
| Blood glucose (mg/dL) | 87.91 ± 6.9 | 90.2 ± 13.4 | 123.9 ± 41.8 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 157.3 ± 30.1 | 170.8 ± 30.1 | 190.3 ± 44.3* |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 121.9 ± 33.1 | 110.2 ± 31.6 | 125.0 ± 42.2 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 39.7 ± 8.9 | 44.7 ± 10.9 | 37.9 ± 13.4 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 121.2 ± 33.7 | 112.3 ± 29.4 | 146.5 ± 64.9* |
|
| |||
| SBP (mm Hg) | 122.1 ± 10.1 | 125.8 ± 4.4 | 136.8 ± 20.6*† |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 80.3 ± 5.2 | 80.8 ± 9.1 | 81.6 ± 9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ACE-i/ARB | - | - | 22 |
| Diuretic | - | - | 17 |
|
| - | - | 1 |
|
| - | - | 10 |
| CCB | - | - | 6 |
| Antiplatelet drugs | - | - | 5 |
| Statins | - | - | 12 |
N = number; CVD = cardiovascular disease; SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; ACE-I = angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB = angiotensin receptor blockers; CCB = calcium channel blockers.
Significantly different from healthy young group;
Significantly different from healthy older adults. Statistical significance was set at the 0.05 level of confidence. Values were expressed as means ± standard deviation.
Muscle O2 saturation parameters in healthy young individuals and older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors.
| Variables | Young healthy | Older healthy | Older, at risk of CVD |
|---|---|---|---|
| StO2base (%) | 69.39 ± 5.10 | 70.91 ± 3.45 | 70.28 ± 3.52 |
| StO2slope_10s (%.s-1) | 1.36 ± 0.48 | 1.02 ± 0.34 | 0.48 ± 0.44* |
| StO2slope_30s (%.s-1) | 1.21 ± 0.35 | 0.90 ± 0.31* | 0.75 ± 0.27* |
| StO2slope_until_base (%.s-1) | 1.24 ± 0.41 | 1.09 ± 0.37 | 0.98 ± 0.40 |
| Time to StO2base (s) | 22.39 ± 11.53 | 20.34 ± 6.21 | 19.00 ± 6.55 |
| Time to StO2max (s) | 54.17 ± 19.58 | 46.82 ± 16.64 | 44.68 ± 14.76* |
| ΔStO2reperfusion (%) | 36.04 ± 9.91 | 26.30 ± 8.24* | 22.79 ± 7.46* |
| StO2AUCabove_base (%. s) | 1137.77 ± 321.99 | 860.31 ± 310.43* | 699.62 ± 309.78* |
| StO2AUCt (%. s) | 3578.34 ± 1046.77 | 2663.58 ± 765.86* | 2348.91 ± 739.57* |
| StO2max (%) | 79.98 ± 5.11 | 78.73 ± 3.49 | 77.24 ± 3.41* |
| StO2min (%) | 44.00 ± 10.39 | 52.33 ± 7.40* | 54.44 ± 8.11* |
Significantly different from young group;
Significantly different from healthy older adults. Statistical significance was set at the 0.05 level of confidence. Values were expressed as means ± SD. Base = baseline; AUC = area under the curve; StO2 = tissue O2 saturation