| Literature DB >> 34104104 |
Jinghao Wang1, Kai Fan2, Cong He3, Qingyang Wang3, Qianhui Zhang3, Wei Huang3.
Abstract
A new Danshensu/tetramethylpyrazine derivative (ADTM) with cardio-protection effects such as antioxidant, arterial relaxation, pro-angiogenesis and antiplatelet activities. Platelet activating factor receptor (PAFR) plays a key role in myocardial ischemia reperfusion (MIR) injury. This study aims to investigate the protective role of ADTM in MIR injury and clarify the potential role of PAFR. We measured the effects of ADTM on MIR injury in rats in vivo and hypoxia re-oxygenation (HR) injury in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs) in vitro. The results show that ADTM can significantly improve the IR-induced decline in heart function as increasing EF and FS, and restore the decreased cardiac hemodynamic parameters (LVSP, ± dp/dt max) and increased the level of LVEDP, decrease the infarct size of damaged myocardium and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in serum. Additionally, ADTM inhibits cardiomyocytes apoptosis, caspase-3 activity, and inflammatory response as well as down-regulates the MIR-induced IL-1β and TNFα production. Next, PAFR expression was significantly down-regulated in cardiomyocytes of MIR model in vivo and in vitro after treated with ADTM compare to IR group. At the same time, ADTM and PAFR small interfering RNA (siRNA) could inhibit cardiomyocytes apoptosis and inflammation during HR, while PAF presents the opposite effect. Furthermore, the above effects of PAF in HR induced cardiomyocytes were reversed by co-treatment of ADTM. Our findings demonstrate for the first time that ADTM protects against MIR injury through inhibition of PAFR signaling, which provides a new treatment for MIR. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: ADTM; PAFR; apoptosis; inflammation; ischemia reperfusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34104104 PMCID: PMC8176181 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.59411
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Figure 1The protective effect of ADTM on rat MIR injury. (A) Chemical structure of ADTM. (B) Representative images showing infarct areas in cross section slices. (C) Statistical analysis of IA/LV ratio. IA: infarct area, LV: left ventricles. (D) Serum LDH activity. **P < 0.01 versus Sham; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 versus IR. n = 6.
Effects of ADTM on hemodynamics and heart function on IR rat
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | LVSP (mmHg) | LVEDP (mmHg) | +dp/dtmax (mmHg/ms) | -dp/dtmax (mmHg/ms) | EF (%) | FS (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | - | 149.7±3.39 | 1.94±0.17 | 5.75±0.29 | 5.19±0.27 | 82.07±2.95 | 57.53±2.90 |
| ADTM | 24 | 148.4 ± 2.54 | 1.97± 0.16 | 5.62± 0.34 | 5.25± 0.27 | 82.25±3.05 | 58.97± 3.65 |
| IR | - | 103.5±3.24** | 5.28±0.28** | 3.75±0.20** | 3.44±0.23** | 51.17±3.24** | 25.25±1.69** |
| IR+ADTM | 6 | 107.6 ± 3.82 | 5.33 ±0.29 | 3.83±0.23 | 3.43±0.26 | 51.45±2.17 | 25.22±2.10 |
| 12 | 111.8± 4.34 | 5.13± 0.24 | 3.99± 0.25 | 3.62± 0.19 | 54.48± 2.81 | 26.97±1.63 | |
| 24 | 131.4± 3.21## | 3.92 ± 0.25## | 5.27 ± 0.27## | 4.73 ± 0.22## | 67.40 ± 3.61# | 39.17 ±2.81## | |
| I/R+ Amlod | 2 | 133.7± 3.97## | 3.88 ± 0.30## | 5.35 ± 0.33## | 4.80 ± 0.25## | 66.43 ± 3.69# | 38.38± 2.38# |
Amlod, Amlodipine; LVSP, left ventricular systolic pressure; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; +dp/dtmax, maximum rate of increase of left ventricular pressure; -dp/dtmax, maximum rate of decrease of left ventricular pressure; EF, ejection fraction; FS, left ventricular fraction shortening. **p < 0.01 versus Sham; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 versus IR. n = 6.
Figure 2ADTM inhibited apoptosis and inflammation in IR myocardium. (A) Cardiac apoptosis were evaluated by TUNEL staining (nucleus stained in blue with DAPI and apoptotic cells stained in green). (B) The percentage of TUNEL-positive cell in different groups (100X). Scale bar = 100 µm. (C) Caspase-3 activity. (D) IL-1β level in hearts. (E) TNF-α level in hearts. **P < 0.01 versus Sham; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 versus IR. n = 4.
Figure 3PAFR is mediated by ADTM in MIR (A&B) The relative protein level of PAFR in heart (n = 3). (C) MTT assay (n = 6). (D&E) The relative protein level of PAFR in cardiomyocytes (n = 3). (F&G) The relative level of PAF in MIR in vivo and in vitro (n = 4). B: **P < 0.01 versus Sham, ##P < 0.01 versus IR; C: **P < 0.01 versus Control; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 versus HR; E: **P < 0.01 versus Control; #P < 0.05 versus HR; F: **P < 0.01 versus Sham, ##P < 0.01 versus IR; G: **P < 0.01 versus Control; #P < 0.05 versus HR.
Figure 4ADTM inhibits cardiomyocytes apoptosis and inflammation by PAFR down-regulation during hypoxia/re-oxygenation. (A&B) The relative protein level of PAFR (n = 3). (C) MTT assay (n = 6). (D) Representative images of TUNEL staining of cardiomyocytes showing the apoptotic cells. (E) Statistical results of TUNEL-positive cells per field (n = 4, 100X). Scale bar = 100 µm. (F) Caspase-3 activity (n = 4). (G) IL-1β level in cardiomyocytes (n = 4). (H) TNF-α level in cardiomyocytes (n = 4). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus Control; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 versus HR.