Philipp Helmer1, Ellen Damm1, Stephan Schiekofer2,3, Kirsten Roomp4, Jochen G Schneider1,4. 1. Saarland University, Medical Center, Dpt. of Internal Medicine II, Homburg, Saar, Germany. 2. Zentrum für Altersmedizin, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Universität Regensburg am Bezirksklinikum, Regensburg, Germany. 3. Sigmund Freud Privat-Universität, Wien, Austria. 4. Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg, and Centre Hospitalier Emile Mayrisch, Esch/Alzette, Luxembourg.
ανβ3‑integrin (aka vitronectin receptor) is a heterodimeric cell surface receptor with varying functions depending on the level and location of its cellular expression. It is involved in signaling both between cells, and between cells and the extracellular matrix 1. ανβ3‑integrin ligation induces conformational changes that lead to the facilitation of signaling events within the cells with consequences such as migration, proliferation, and differentiation 2. Gene-knockout studies in mice suggested a role for ανβ3‑integrin in disease conditions such as inflammation, bone diseases and cancer 3-5. Consequently, β3‑integrin modulation, as a part of the vitronectin receptor, has been tested to reduce osteoporosis, tumor growth and angiogenesis by blocking β3‑integrin with antibodies or RGD peptide antagonists, yet the results are inconsistent. In clinical studies a natural modulation of β3‑integrin by the Leu33Pro polymorphism (rs5918) has been demonstrated to be associated with diabetes mellitus and furthermore diabetic vascular diseases 6, 7. The mechanism of this observation remains unclear so far. However, the Leu33Pro polymorphism results in a constitutively active β3‑integrin 8 and β3-integrin-deficient macrophages have been shown to be involved in inflammatory atherosclerosis 3.The aim of our study was to investigate if there is an association between the Leu33Pro polymorphism with diabetic complications and to functionally characterize the inflammatory activity of human differentiated macrophages in carriers of the polymorphism versus controls.
Material and Methods
The study was approved (11 June, 2015) by the ethics committee of Saarland (E242/14) and all participants gave written consent to the study (n=193). They were recruited from collaborating diabetic clinics and diagnose of diabetes was made according to American Diabetes Association criteria. 186 subjects (62% men, 38% females; mean age 64 years) were included into the study. Patient characteristics and biochemical parameters were determined from standardized clinical charts. The patients were genotyped for the Leu33Pro polymorphism using a Taqman assay modified from a previously published protocol 9. Blood was drawn from the study participants (n=24) for harvesting blood derived monocytes in Leucocept tubes (Greiner, Kremsmuenster, Austria) through Ficoll-Paque Premium density gradient centrifugation. CD14-expressing cells were selected using CD14+ micro-beads for incubation and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS, Miltenyi biotech, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany). The CD14+ cells were further differentiated into macrophages by incubation with X‑VIVOTM 10 medium containing 100 ng/ml M-CSF for 8 days. The species and vitality of the cultured cells were confirmed by immunofluorescence. Macrophages were plated in equal numbers in 12 well plates and, after serum starvation, stimulated either with 100 ng/ml LPS, 200 nM PMA or 50 ng/ml interferon γ. MPO- and multiplex ELISAs were performed on cell supernatants according to manufacturer's instructions and normalized to cell protein concentration. Statistical methods comprised parametric and non-parametric correlation analyses, Chi-square test, ANOVA or non-parametric tests where appropriate. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, release 19 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago).
Results
The allele frequencies were 0.84 for the wildtype and 0.16 for the Leu33Pro polymorphism. The allele frequencies were in accordance to the Hardy-Weinberg-equilibrium (Chi-square p=0.59). The characteristics of the study population according to the genotype are displayed in Table The cultivated monocytes from the diabetic patients with the different genotypes were differentiated into macrophages. Apart from morphology, we assessed the successful differentiation by verifying for expression of the macrophage specific marker EMR-1 and proper uptake of oxLDL by immunofluorescence to prove the vitality of the cultured cells (Fig. ). We could also show that β3‑integrin is expressed in unstimulated differentiated macrophages (Fig. ). We next examined the macrophage secretory capacity in response to the stimuli (LPS, PMA, Interferon γ) depending on the appropriate genotype. In this regard, we found no unifying and logical association of a genotype with the magnitude of any of the measured inflammatory markers.Previous results suggested an association between the Leu33Pro variant in β3-integrin with macrovascular complications in diabetic patients 10. Here, we did not find a significant difference in the prevalence of diabetic micro- and macrovascular complications associated with the Leu33Pro polymorphism. We found that the relative frequency of diabetic nephropathy was 50% within the diabetic patients who were homozygous for the Leu33Pro polymorphism, 21% in diabetic patients homozygous for the wildtype, and 12% in the heterozygous diabetic patients. We also found indications of significant differences in GFR depending on the genotype in the overall ANOVA (p=0.034) accompanied by a corresponding trend (p=0.112) towards higher creatinine levels in the homozygous versus the wildtype group [1.32 mg/dL (0) vs. 0.97 mg/dL (0)].Due to the overall low number of homozygous subjects in our study, we employed a recessive model to leave out one degree of freedom weight as compared to setting out 3 genotypes as separate categories. In this recessive model which requires homozygosity to show an effect we found a significant increase (p=0.029) of the creatinine levels in homozygosity (Fig. ) as well as a trend towards reduced GFR rate (p=0.076) in the homozygous subjects as compared to the control group of heterozygous and wildtype patients.
Conclusions
The exact pathophysiology of the diabetes complications remains incompletely understood. In addition to the toxicity of hyperglycemia, inflammatory processes also likely make an important contribution to the pathophysiology. Especially macrovascular complications appear to be a result of inflammatory vascular diseases and the β3-integrin has been implicated in inflammatory diseases and diabetes 3, 6, 11. These observations prompted us to examine macrophages from diabetic subjects carrying the Leu33Pro allele of β3-integrin. There are previous reports claiming that β3-integrin is not expressed in macrophages at all 12, and yet, we were able to show that β3-integrin is expressed in fully differentiated human macrophages (Fig. To our surprise, we did not find a significantly and/or coherently altered inflammatory state in macrophages from subjects with the Leu33Pro variant of β3-integrin. Hence, the exact function of β3-integrin in macrophages remains to be explored as both pro-inflammatory 13 and anti-inflammatory roles are described 3 so far. We are tempted to speculate the Leu33Pro variant in β3-integrin does not modulate the macrophages and their innate immune activity, at least not in our cohort.The present work demonstrated homozygosity for the Leu33Pro polymorphism in 3.23% and heterozygosity in 26.34% of the diabetic subjects and thus is in accordance to previously published literature 6. Reports on cohorts collected by other groups investigating different populations, show different allele frequencies, which suggests a significant dependence of the allele frequency on ethnicity 14.We have found no association between the Leu33Pro variant in β3-integrin and the diabetic state or markers of metabolism, which is also in accordance to previously published literature 7. Our study was not designed and is too small to contribute to the large debate on the association of the Leu33Pro variant and coronary artery disease. However, we identified a trend towards the association of diabetic nephropathy and of its markers with theLeu33Pro allele in our small cohort. This finding is intriguing because β3-integrin has thought to play a role in diabetic kidney disease for years 15. Patients of our cohort showed a worsening of renal function with two mutated alleles of the polymorphism. Although we remain careful because of the size of our cohort and possible missed confounding factors, our results corroborate another study that showed podocyte damage in human diabetic nephropathy by activation of the β3‑integrin 16. The mechanism by which the activation of β3-integrin may lead to progression of diabetic kidney disease remains unclear. One could speculate that a constitutively active β3‑integrin may result in cytoskeletal re-organization leading to improper barrier function of the podocytes. Another consequence of this constitutively activate state could be a facilitation of neo-angiogenesis in the early phases of diabetic kidney disease. These speculations exceed the scope of the present work but are well corroborated by the finding that inhibition of ανβ3-integrin in pigs reduced diabetic nephropathy as compared to controls 14.In conclusion, the Leu33Pro variant of the β3-integrin gene is associated with diabetic nephropathy suggesting that a constitutive active β3-integrin and not the magnitude of its expression may be associated with diabetic nephropathy by complex underlying mechanistic networks. The macrophages of the Leu33Pro diabetic subjects and their inflammatory capacity do not contribute to the explanation of the observed association. The missing underlying explanation warrants further basic research efforts and epidemiological evidence.
Author Contributions
PH and ED performed the experiments and collected the data, KR and SS contributed to the data interpretation and helped writing the paper. JGS provided the study protocol and wrote the paper. PH and ED contributed to the study protocol and analyzed data. All authors interpreted the findings, edited and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Table 1
Clinical characteristics of patients according to the Leu33Pro polymorphism; values as mean ± SD or median with interquartile difference.
Authors: Alexander S Antonov; Galina N Antonova; David H Munn; Nahid Mivechi; Rudolf Lucas; John D Catravas; Alexander D Verin Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Louise E Reynolds; Lorenza Wyder; Julie C Lively; Daniela Taverna; Stephen D Robinson; Xiaozhu Huang; Dean Sheppard; Richard O Hynes; Kairbaan M Hodivala-Dilke Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Vincent Jallu; Pierre Poulain; Patrick F J Fuchs; Cecile Kaplan; Alexandre G de Brevern Journal: Biochimie Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 4.079
Authors: J G Schneider; S Schiekofer; M von Eynatten; P Schlimmer; K A Dugi Journal: Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 2.949
Authors: S Rzezniczek; M Obuchowicz; W Datka; M Siwek; D Dudek; K Kmiotek; K Oved; N Shomron; D Gurwitz; A Pilc Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 6.222