Literature DB >> 34103837

Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block -An effective rescue analgesia for pediatric open upper abdominal surgery.

Aswini Kuberan1, Nagalakshmi Swaminathan1, Adinarayanan Sethuramachandran1, Mukilan Balasubramanian1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34103837      PMCID: PMC8174440          DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_69_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0970-9185


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The erector spinae plane block (ESPB), since its initial description in 2016,[1] has also been described as a modality for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic, laparoscopic, and open thorocoabdominal surgeries in pediatric patients.[2] We would like to report the use of ESPB as a rescue analgesic, in a 4-year-old male child weighing 15 kg, who underwent right sided adrenalectomy for a functioning adreno-cortical tumor. Written informed consent was obtained from the parent for the purpose of publication. The surgical plan was robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Our analgesic plan included intravenous fentanyl, paracetamol, and ketorolac. After 5 h of surgery, surgeons planned to open the abdomen due to difficult dissection and bleeding, with a subcostal incision extending from T7 to T10 on the right side. Intraoperative surgical response was managed with IV fentanyl (total dose of 45 mcg). A single-shot right sided ESPB was performed for postoperative analgesia at the end of surgery. In the same left lateral position, after aseptic precautions, a high frequency linear transducer probe (6 to 15 MHz SonoSite S series; Bothell, WA, USA) was placed in longitudinal para-sagittal direction 2 cm lateral and parallel to the T7 to T10 spinous process marked [Figure 1a]. The probe was moved laterally to visualize the tip of transverse process T9 [Figure 1b]. A 5 cm 20 G needle was inserted in-plane, caudal-cranial direction, to reach below erector spinae muscle (ESM). After negative aspiration, 1 ml of normal saline was injected to confirm the spread of saline. Once cranio-caudad spread was confirmed, 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (0.5 ml/kg) was deposited below the ESM sheath [Figure 1c]. Following the block, infiltration with local anesthetic (4 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine) was done at the laparoscopic port sites before extubation. Later the child was extubated and shifted to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). In PICU, child had stable vital signs with no tachycardia, respiratory rate 15/min, alert and comfortable with FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale of 0. No rescue analgesic (IV fentanyl) was used for 24 h postoperatively. Paracetamol (IV) 10 mg/kg was administered every 6 h for 48 h. No side effects of the block were reported.
Figure 1

(a) Patient in left lateral position, probe oriented in sagittal direction over the marked spinous process from T7 to T10. In-plane insertion of needle from caudad direction. (b) Para-sagittal ultrasonographic visualization of flat hyperechoic transverse process from T7 to T10.(c) Needle tip above the T9 transverse process. Local anesthetic drug lifting up ESM with cranio-cephalad spread from T7 to T10

(a) Patient in left lateral position, probe oriented in sagittal direction over the marked spinous process from T7 to T10. In-plane insertion of needle from caudad direction. (b) Para-sagittal ultrasonographic visualization of flat hyperechoic transverse process from T7 to T10.(c) Needle tip above the T9 transverse process. Local anesthetic drug lifting up ESM with cranio-cephalad spread from T7 to T10 In the ESPB, the drug is deposited deep to the ESM sheath and superficial to transverse process, as close as possible to the origin of the dorsal rami of the spinal nerves in the targeted dermatomes and a cephalocaudal distribution of drug is expected.[1] We chose ESPB as a rescue analgesic technique rather than caudal anesthesia to avoid bilateral sensory block, urinary retention, and early ambulation.[3] Lower thoracic epidural can be a better alternative, but it has been reported with unrecognized dural taps, multiple attempts, total spinal anesthesia, and nerve injuries in pediatric population.[4] Our experience with this patient emphasizes the utility of the ESPB as a rescue analgesic modality during unplanned conversion from minimally invasive surgical approach to an open surgical approach.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Caudal epidural blocks in paediatric patients: a review and practical considerations.

Authors:  Marion Wiegele; Peter Marhofer; Per-Arne Lönnqvist
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a follow-up one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Paediatric Anaesthesiologists (ADARPEF).

Authors:  Claude Ecoffey; Frédéric Lacroix; Elisabeth Giaufré; Gilles Orliaguet; Philippe Courrèges
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.556

3.  The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Mauricio Forero; Sanjib D Adhikary; Hector Lopez; Calvin Tsui; Ki Jinn Chin
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 4.  Early experience with erector spinae plane blocks in children.

Authors:  Erica L Holland; Adrian T Bosenberg
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.556

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.