| Literature DB >> 34103610 |
Maryam Kazemi1,2, Mina Bazyar3, Mohammad Mehdi Naghizadeh1, Azizallah Dehghan1, Massih Sedigh Rahimabadi1,4, Mahsa Rostami Chijan1,4, Mostafa Bijani1, Maryam Zahmatkeshan1, Alireza Ghaemi5, Nastaran Samimi6, Reza Homayounfar7,8, Mojtaba Farjam9,10.
Abstract
One of the main health problems in many societies is the increased opium abuse, which was found to be correlated with many problems like cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation of opium use with blood lipoproteins as the risk factor of CVD. This was a cross-sectional study conducted on participants of the first phase of the PERSIAN Cohort study who were aged between 35 and 70 years old. Demographic characteristics; history of smoking, alcohol, and opium consumption; medical history; and medications were asked and the related checklists were filled out. The levels of physical activity and fat intake were also registered. As well, lipoprotein profiles were investigated by blood sampling. The linear and logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between opium and lipid profile and the statistical significant level was considered as < 0.05. Among 9300 participants with a mean age of 48.06 ± 9.44 years old, 49.6% of them were men. About 24.1% of the participants used opium. In the linear regression models, unlike TG (β = 2.2, p = 0.36), total cholesterol (β = - 2.5, p = 0.02), LDL (β = - 2.0, p = 0.04), and HDL (β = - 1.0, p = 0.04) were significantly lower in people who used opium compared to the others. In the logistic regression models, abnormal level of LDL (OR = 0.78, p = 0.003) and total cholesterol (OR = 0.82, p = 0.008) were less in people who used opium compared to the others. This study showed that there is a correlation between opium usage and lower levels of total cholesterol and LDL; however, the lower level of HDL in normal range was seen in opium users. Considering the current evidences, most of them showed the increased risks of ischemic heart disease, heart attack, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and cancer in opium users. Therefore, Healthcare providers and patients should be noticed about the deleterious effects of opium consumption on various vascular events. In addition, it is necessary for managers and policy makers of the health care system to take the necessary measures to raise the level of awareness and health literacy of the general public about the high-risk side effects of opium use and to take necessary and effective strategies to prevent and reduce its use.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34103610 PMCID: PMC8187592 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91533-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flowchart of the study design of lipid profile in opium users.
Socio demographic characteristics of the opium and non-opium users in first phase of PERSIAN cohort study.
| Variable | Opium user | Opium non-user | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| Male | 2152 | 49.6 | 2188 | 50.4 | 4340 | 46.7 |
| Female | 87 | 1.89 | 4873 | 98.2 | 4960 | 53.3 |
| Employed | 1946 | 40 | 2921 | 60 | 4867 | 52.3 |
| Unemployed | 291 | 6.6 | 4125 | 93.4 | 4416 | 47.5 |
| Single | 53 | 14.8 | 304 | 85.2 | 357 | 3.8 |
| Married | 2163 | 26 | 6155 | 74 | 8318 | 89.4 |
| widow | 12 | 2.3 | 517 | 97.7 | 529 | 5.7 |
| Divorced | 11 | 11.5 | 85 | 88.5 | 96 | 1 |
| Low | 656 | 21.4 | 2411 | 78.6 | 3067 | 33 |
| Middle | 722 | 24.2 | 2262 | 75.8 | 2984 | 32.1 |
| High | 843 | 26.6 | 2322 | 73.4 | 3165 | 34 |
Figure 2Comparison of lipid profile between opium user and non-user at the first of phase of PERSIAN cohort study. Lipid profile is presented with the mean—black bars—and standard deviation—white error bars—in mg/dL. The normal and abnormal ranges of lipid profiles are colored in green and red background. The border of the normal and abnormal HDL between the male and female subjects was also colored as purple background. The p-values came from a linear multivariable model that all variables having a correlation with lipid profile in univariate analysis with a p-value less than 0.2, were added to it. The p-value of the opium use variable in this model was reported as the Adjusted p-value.
Figure 3Percentage of participants with normal and abnormal levels of lipid profile in both user and non-user groups of opium. The normal range was presented as green (dark green as healthy and light green as normal borderline) and the abnormal range was presented as red color (light red as abnormal borderline and dark red as unhealthy). The levels of TG, cholesterol, LDL, and HDL were presented in the above table.
logistic regression model for lipid profile in first phase of PERSIAN cohort Study.
| TG > 150 | Chol > 200 | LDL > 130 | HDL < 40 male < 50 female | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p-value | OR | 95% CI for OR | p-value | OR | 95% CI for OR | p-value | OR | 95% CI for OR | p-value | OR | 95% CI for OR | ||
| Opium use | 0.646 | 1.032 | 0.902–1.180 | 0.008 | 0.822 | 0.710–0.951 | 0.003 | 0.785 | 0.667–0.923 | 0.410 | 0.830 | 0.532–1.293 | |
| Marital state (married) | 0.208 | 1.199 | 0.904–1.591 | 0.793 | 1.035 | 0.803–1.333 | 0.133 | 1.247 | 0.935–1.663 | 0.022 | 0.734 | 0.564–0.956 | |
| Marital state (widow) | 0.013 | 1.548 | 1.097–2.184 | 0.458 | 1.125 | 0.824–1.535 | 0.021 | 1.500 | 1.064–2.114 | 0.001 | 0.568 | 0.413–0.782 | |
| Marital state (divorced) | 0.994 | 1.002 | 0.561–1.792 | 0.910 | 0.971 | 0.582–1.621 | 0.442 | 1.242 | 0.715–2.155 | 0.838 | 0.948 | 0.569–1.580 | |
| Socioeconomic (middle) | 0.314 | 1.063 | 0.943–1.198 | 0.123 | 1.093 | 0.976–1.224 | NUiM | 0.309 | 1.075 | 0.935–1.237 | |||
| Socioeconomic (high) | 0.566 | 1.038 | 0.915–1.176 | 0.610 | 1.032 | 0.915–1.164 | NUiM | 0.574 | 1.045 | 0.897–1.217 | |||
| Job (unemployed) | 0.127 | 1.115 | 0.970–1.281 | 0.268 | 1.076 | 0.945–1.226 | 0.048 | 1.153 | 1.001–1.329 | 0.002 | 0.799 | 0.692–0.923 | |
| Smoking | NUiM | 0.525 | 0.957 | 0.836–1.095 | 0.232 | 0.913 | 0.787–1.060 | 0.574 | 0.923 | 0.700–1.219 | |||
| Alcohol consuming | 0.046 | 1.385 | 1.006–1.909 | 0.001 | 1.746 | 1.258–2.424 | 0.002 | 1.774 | 1.241–2.536 | < 0.001 | 1.020 | 1.012–1.029 | |
| Gender (Female) | < 0.001 | 0.655 | 0.563–0.762 | < 0.001 | 1.342 | 1.157–1.557 | 0.001 | 1.315 | 1.120–1.545 | 0.368 | 0.990 | 0.967–1.012 | |
| Age (years) | 0.090 | 1.005 | 0.999–1.012 | < 0.001 | 1.035 | 1.029–1.042 | < 0.001 | 1.034 | 1.027–1.040 | < 0.001 | 0.958 | 0.947–0.970 | |
| Education years (years) | 0.966 | 1.000 | 0.984–1.017 | 0.989 | 1.000 | 0.984–1.016 | 0.004 | 1.025 | 1.008–1.042 | NUiM | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | < 0.001 | 1.114 | 1.103–1.126 | < 0.001 | 1.063 | 1.053–1.074 | < 0.001 | 1.046 | 1.035–1.057 | NUiM | |||
| Physical activity (Met-h/day) | < 0.001 | 0.990 | 0.985–0.995 | 0.060 | 0.995 | 0.991–1.000 | 0.010 | 0.993 | 0.988–0.998 | NUiM | |||
| Fat intake (g/day) | NUiM | 0.327 | 1.001 | 0.999–1.002 | 0.266 | 0.999 | 0.998–1.001 | NUiM | |||||