Lucy D Whalley1, Puck van Gerwen2, Jarvist M Frost3, Sunghyun Kim2, Samantha N Hood2, Aron Walsh2,4. 1. Department of Mathematics, Physics and Electrical Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8QH, U.K. 2. Department of Materials, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K. 3. Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K. 4. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Abstract
Improvement in the optoelectronic performance of halide perovskite semiconductors requires the identification and suppression of nonradiative carrier trapping processes. The iodine interstitial has been established as a deep level defect and implicated as an active recombination center. We analyze the quantum mechanics of carrier trapping. Fast and irreversible electron capture by the neutral iodine interstitial is found. The effective Huang-Rhys factor exceeds 300, indicative of the strong electron-phonon coupling that is possible in soft semiconductors. The accepting phonon mode has a frequency of 53 cm-1 and has an associated electron capture coefficient of 1 × 10-10 cm3 s-1. The inverse participation ratio is used to quantify the localization of phonon modes associated with the transition. We infer that suppression of octahedral rotations is an important factor to enhance defect tolerance.
Improvement in the optoelectronic performance of halideperovskite semiconductors requires the identification and suppression of nonradiative carrier trapping processes. The iodine interstitial has been established as a deep level defect and implicated as an active recombination center. We analyze the quantum mechanics of carrier trapping. Fast and irreversible electron capture by the neutral iodine interstitial is found. The effective Huang-Rhys factor exceeds 300, indicative of the strong electron-phonon coupling that is possible in soft semiconductors. The accepting phonon mode has a frequency of 53 cm-1 and has an associated electron capture coefficient of 1 × 10-10 cm3 s-1. The inverse participation ratio is used to quantify the localization of phonon modes associated with the transition. We infer that suppression of octahedral rotations is an important factor to enhance defect tolerance.
The unusual defect
chemistry and physics of lead halideperovskites
has attracted significant attention.[1−3] Slow nonradiative electron–hole
recombination is unusual for solution processed semiconductors and
supports high voltage and efficient light-to-electricity conversion
in a solar cell.[4] While significant defect
populations are expected based on equilibrium thermodynamics[5] of these soft crystalline materials, and solution
processing introduces additional disorder,[6] the native defects do not appear to contribute to nonradiative recombination
of electrons and holes. This behavior of halideperovskites has been
broadly termed “defect tolerance”.[7−9] Further improvement
in the performance of halideperovskite devices requires suppression
of nonradiative carrier capture and recombination events.[10] In this report, we perform a quantum mechanical
carrier-capture analysis of the interaction between electrons and
the iodine interstitial in CH3NH3PbI3 (MAPI).Shockley–Read–Hall (SRH) recombination
is associated
with the successive capture of an electron and hole following the
photoexcitation () of a semiconductor. The kinetics
reduce
to first-order in a heavily doped (n or p type) semiconductor; minority carrier capture becomes the rate-limiting
process. A necessary step is the change from delocalized-to-localized
electronic wave functions, and multiple phonon (ℏω) emission
through the associated structural relaxation,[11] as illustrated in Figure . The excess electronic energy of the charge carriers is lost
to heat. Taking the example of a neutral defect (D0), the
overall recombination process is
Figure 1
Electron capture by a
charged defect in a semiconductor. In the
initial configuration (blue), there is a charged defect (D+) and a free electron (e–) residing in the conduction
band. In the final configuration configuration (pink), the electron
is captured to yield a neutral charge state (D0). The coordinate Q maps out the change in structure between the two configurations.
Electron capture by a
charged defect in a semiconductor. In the
initial configuration (blue), there is a charged defect (D+) and a free electron (e–) residing in the conduction
band. In the final configuration configuration (pink), the electron
is captured to yield a neutral charge state (D0). The coordinate Q maps out the change in structure between the two configurations.
Nonradiative Carrier Capture from First-Principles
Making use of Fermi’s golden rule, the carrier capture coefficient
from an initial state i to a final state f can be described byHere V is the supercell volume, g is the degeneracy
of the final state, Wif is the electron–phonon
coupling matrix element,
Θ is the thermal occupation of
the vibration state m, ⟨χ|ΔQ|χ⟩ is the overlap of the vibrational wave functions χ,
and the Dirac δ(ΔE + mℏωi – nℏωf) ensures conservation of energy. Each of these quantities
can be derived from density functional theory (DFT) calculations.[12,13]The meaning of eq becomes clearer when you realize that ΔE and ΔQ refer to vertical and horizontal offsets in a configuration
coordinate diagram, and that ωi (ωf) is the frequency of the effective one-dimensional vibration in
the initial (final) charge state (Figure ). Figure provides a useful guide to the sensitivity of the
underlying model parameters and the accessible range of C.
Figure 2
Variation of the carrier capture coefficient C with
the parameters ΔE and ΔQ using eq . This data
are for the single frequency approximation and taking frequencies
near the extrema of the physical range: (a) ℏω = 8 meV
and (b) ℏω = 50 meV.
Variation of the carrier capture coefficient C with
the parameters ΔE and ΔQ using eq . This data
are for the single frequency approximation and taking frequencies
near the extrema of the physical range: (a) ℏω = 8 meV
and (b) ℏω = 50 meV.
Methods
Electronic Structure
A quantum mechanical treatment
of electron capture was performed using the open-source CarrierCapture package.[13] The 1D Schrödinger
equation for the potential energy surface was solved using a finite
difference method. This builds on the approach of Alkauskas et al.,[12] and the implementation has been applied to a
range of semiconductors.[14,15]The underlying
electronic structures were calculated using density functional theory
(DFT) as implemented in the GPU port of VASP,[16] using a plane wave basis set with an energy
cutoff of 400 eV. Projection operators were optimized in real space
with an accuracy of 0.02 meV per atom, and a 2 × 2 × 2 gamma
centered Monkhorst–Pack mesh was used for the Brillouin zone
integration.So that no preference was given to a particular
combination of
octahedral tilts the starting point for atomic relaxation was MAPI
in the pseudocubic phase. The interstitial was placed in a 192-atom
supercell built from an expansion of the 12-atom unit cell, using
the transformation matrix m:Ground
state geometries were
found using the PBEsol functional,[17] which
has been shown to accurately describe the structures and phonons of
these materials. The internal atomic coordinates were relaxed until
the force acting on each atom was less than 0.01 eV Å–1. Defect formation energies were converged to within 0.01 eV per
formula unit between the 192- and 384-atom supercells.The potential
energy surface was calculated using the screened-exchange
HSE06 functional[18] (α = 0.43) including
spin–orbit coupling (SOC), with total energy converged to within
10–5 eV. The electron–phonon coupling term
is derived from wave functions calculated with the PBEsol functional
and SOC.
Lattice Dynamics
The harmonic phonon modes were calculated
using a 2 × 2 × 2 supercell expansion (93 atoms including
the iodine interstitial). To evaluate the force-constant matrix the
finite displacement method was used with displacements of 0.01 Å.
Forces were computed in VASP using a plane wave basis set of 700 eV,
a total energy convergence criterion of 10–8 eV,
and the PBEsol functional. A 2 × 2 × 2 gamma centered Monkhorst–Pack
mesh was used for the Brillouin zone integration. To extract the phonon
eigenvectors and frequencies the Phonopy package[19] was used. The Inverse Participation Ratio was
calculated using the Julia-Phonons package.[20]
Results and Discussion
Common vacancy
defects do not introduce levels into the band gap
of lead iodide perovskites, while iodine interstitials do.[1] Interstitial iodine may be formed by the incorporation
of excess iodine (I(g) ⇌ Ii) or through Frenkel
pair formation (II ⇌ VI + Ii). There are three accessible charge states for the iodine interstitial
(+/0/−). The calculated geometries of the three charge states
are shown in Figure .
Figure 3
Defect geometries of Ii+, Ii–, IiIP, and
IiOP in CH3NH3PbI3. IP indicates that the neutral
defect is lying in the ab-plane. OP indicates that
the defect is lying along the c-axis. All distances
are measured in units of Å. The iodine
is colored in purple, and the lead, in gray. For clarity, the organic
cations are not shown.
Defect geometries of Ii+, Ii–, IiIP, and
IiOP in CH3NH3PbI3. IP indicates that the neutral
defect is lying in the ab-plane. OP indicates that
the defect is lying along the c-axis. All distances
are measured in units of Å. The iodine
is colored in purple, and the lead, in gray. For clarity, the organic
cations are not shown.The neutral interstitial,
rather than remaining as an isolated
iodine atom in an interstitial region, bonds with a lattice iodine
to form an I2– complex. This is referred
to as an H-center by the metalhalide community and has a characteristic
paramagnetic S = (1/2) spin configuration.[21] Iodine is well-known to form polyiodide chains
with bond lengths that are sensitive to the charge state. The I–I
bond length in solid orthorhombic crystalline iodine is 2.67 Å,
which lengthens to 3.23 Å upon formation of I2–.[22] Our bond lengths are within 0.05 Å of this value. Owing to
the octahedral tilting pattern, we distinguish between in-plane (IP)
and out-of-plane (OP) configurations for this defect.For the
positive charge state, an asymmetric trimer structure is
found that is typical of I3–. For example, the tri-iodide group
in CsI3 has interbond distances of 2.82 and 3.10 Å,
with the longer bond possessing the majority of the additional charge.[23] In the negative charge state, the antibonding
orbitals are filled, resulting in a split-interstitial configuration
with the longest I–I bond length of all three charge states.In the dark, the positive charge state is thermodynamically favored
in a p-type regime (E close to the valence
band) and the negative charge is favored in an n-type regime (E close to the conduction band). The neutral
interstitial is metastable but has been suggested to form under illumination,[24,25] which is our focus here.Various first-principles studies
have attempted to elucidate the
nature of charge capture at the iodine interstitial site. Fast nonradiative
recombination[25] and fast radiative recombination[24] at the neutral iodine interstitial have each
been suggested. This contradiction is despite both studies evaluating
the electronic structure using the same Heyd–Scuseria–Ernserhof
(HSE) hybrid density functional[18] and incorporating
spin–orbit coupling (SOC), demonstrating the sensitivity of
this system to the exact calculation parameters and defect geometries.
As an extension to static DFT, ab initio molecular dynamics (MD) can
be used to model the motion at room temperature. Large fluctuations
in the halide vacancy defect energy level (up to 1 eV),[26] and the formation of hole polarons that suppress
charge recombination[27] have both been reported.
However, a comprehensive MD analysis—using a hybrid functional
and SOC—remains computationally prohibitive.[26,28] We find a charge capture rate that is highly sensitive to the defect
geometry; the importance of geometry relaxation, comparison with other
computational reports, and the reference configuration for defect
energetics are discussed in the Supporting Information.We now consider the potential energy surface (PES) associated
with
sequential electron and hole capture, Figure .The coordinate Q is defined as , where the sum is over all inorganic atoms i with mass m and a displacement from equilibrium of Δr. After electron capture at IiOP, not only the
I dimer but also the Pb atoms and the surrounding I atoms that form
the octahedra relax significantly, as shown in Figure . Analysis of the Pb–I–Pb angles
in each charge state demonstrates that charge capture is associated
with rotations of the inorganic octahedral cage (Figure S6). As the large displacements of the heavy Pb and
I atoms are involved, ΔQ is large (ΔQ = 36 amu1/2 Å). This value is double
that typically found for nonradiative recombination centers in kesterites[15] and demonstrates that there is strong coupling
between the electronic charge state of the defect and the lattice
distortion.
Figure 4
Configuration coordinate diagram for carrier capture by the iodine
interstitial. The DFT energies (solid circles) were calculated using
the hybrid HSE06 functional. The coordinate Q, which
corresponds to a linear combination of phonon modes that map between
the two charge states, is defined in the main text. (a) To model electron
trapping at the neutral iodine interstitial, the excited state of
the system corresponds to the neutral defect with a photogenerated
electron in the conduction band and hole in the valence band. The
ground state corresponds to the negatively charged defect with a hole
in the valence band. (b) A comparison between the harmonic (dashed
line) and anharmonic (solid line) PES. The curvatures are determined
from second and fourth order spline fits to the DFT calculated energies.
Configuration coordinate diagram for carrier capture by the iodine
interstitial. The DFT energies (solid circles) were calculated using
the hybrid HSE06 functional. The coordinate Q, which
corresponds to a linear combination of phonon modes that map between
the two charge states, is defined in the main text. (a) To model electron
trapping at the neutral iodine interstitial, the excited state of
the system corresponds to the neutral defect with a photogenerated
electron in the conduction band and hole in the valence band. The
ground state corresponds to the negatively charged defect with a hole
in the valence band. (b) A comparison between the harmonic (dashed
line) and anharmonic (solid line) PES. The curvatures are determined
from second and fourth order spline fits to the DFT calculated energies.The definition of configuration coordinate Q is
not unique. For example, we might define ΔQ in the MAPI:I system as the root mean
squared displacement of the two bonding iodine. For this definition
of ΔQ we find that electron trapping at the
neutral iodine interstitial proceeds with a small geometrical rearrangement, ΔQ = 0.073 Å, resulting in fast radiative electron
capture. This small distortion of the iodine dimer has been reported
previously.[24] However, this model excludes
the large relaxation of the surrounding perovskite structure, leading
to a significant underestimation of ΔQ and S.There are two classes of phonon mode associated
with nonradiative
transitions. Promoting modes couple the initial and final electronic
states by producing a sizable electron–phonon coupling matrix
element Wif. Accepting modes take up the
excess electronic energy after charge capture, resulting in a change
of mean displacement. Rather than consider each phonon mode in turn
(which would be computationally prohibitive), we use the effective
mode Q to consider the accepting modes only.[29]Wif, a prefactor
in eq , is proportional
to (i) the change
in overlap between the initial (delocalized) and final (localized)
single particle electron wave functions, as a function of Q, and (ii) the change in energy between these two states.
For electron capture at the neutral iodine interstitial, Wif is 0.0036 eVamu–1/2 Å–1. This is comparable to an estimate for the maximum possible value, Wifmax = 0.0048 eVamu–1/2 Å–1,
demonstrating that Q has both accepting and promoting
character, and justifying the use of the configuration coordinate.
Further details of this comparison can be found in the Supporting Information.The Huang–Rhys
factor, ,
is the number of phonons emitted after
carrier capture. S in the strong coupling regime
(S ≫ 1) is typically associated with nonradiative
carrier capture accompanied by multiphonon emission.[29] The harmonic PES of the iodine interstitial is soft, with
an effective frequency of 38 cm–1 (4.7 meV) and
53 cm–1 (6.6 meV) for the neutral and negative states,
respectively. The low frequency of the negative charge state, and
large ΔE, gives a “giant” Huang–Rhys
factor of 350. For comparison, a substitutional Si atom in GaAs (also
known as the DX-center), the archetypal defect exhibiting
large lattice relaxation, has a Huang–Rhys factor of S = 75 with ω = 81 cm–1 and ΔQ = 9 amu1/2 Å.[14,30]To identify the normal modes that are associated with lattice
relaxation,
we analyze the phonon dispersion of the negatively charged iodine
interstitial. For each phonon eigenvector (e) at the gamma point of the Brillouin zone,
we calculate the inverse participation ratio (IPR):where N is the number of
phonon modes.[31] A fully localized phonon
mode has an IPR of 1. For a 96-atom supercell, a fully delocalized
mode has an IPR of = 0.0104. We find that the lowest
energy
resonant mode (with an IPR = 0.046) has a frequency of 53 cm–1, equal to the frequency of the negative charge state PES in the
harmonic approximation. The agreement indicates that this resonant
mode has a strong accepting carrier and will be active in the uptake
of excess electronic energy after the charge transition. Additional
analysis of the phonon modes associated with the defective crystal
can be found in the Supporting Information.Finally, we consider the capture coefficients associated
with sequential
electron and hole capture, as outlined in eq . The electron capture coefficient C determines the rate of electron
capture R at a neutral
iodine interstitialwhere Nt is the
density of neutral defect traps and n is the electron
density.It is evident from Figure that an anharmonic description is necessary,
as parabolic
functions poorly describe the PES away from the equilibrium structures.
For capture processes where the atomic displacement is smaller, a
harmonic oscillator model can be used to predict nonradiative capture
coefficients using bulk material parameters (e.g., carrier effective
mass, dielectric constant) and the defect energetics (ΔE and the charge transition level).[32] Unfortunately
this model, while computationally economic and ideal for high-throughput
type studies, is not valid for the iodine interstitial due to the
anharmonicity of the PES.In the harmonic picture, the iodine
interstitial has an electron
capture coefficient of 8 × 10–17 cm3 s–1. Analysis of the vibrational wave functions
for each PES shows that quantum tunnelling between the initial and
final charge states is significant at energies below the classical
barrier (Figure S5). Despite tunnelling,
the capture coefficient is low due to the large electron capture barrier
(600 meV). Fast radiative recombination, which is of the order 1 ×
10–10 cm3 s–1 in MAPI,[33] dominates in the harmonic approximation.In the more accurate anharmonic picture the electron capture coefficient
is 1 × 10–10 cm3 s–1, suggesting that nonradiative electron capture will compete with
radiative capture. The electron capture barrier is 148 meV, much smaller
than in the harmonic case, yielding a larger capture coefficient.
As in the harmonic picture, quantum tunnelling is significant (Figure S5). Measuring the electron capture rate
at the iodine interstitial is difficult, as the trap density is hard
to quantify and varies considerably with the material processing protocol.
Nevertheless, a tentative approximation of the capture rate from a
rate constant of 2 × 107 s–1[34] and assuming a trap density of 1 × 1016 cm–3[35] yields
a capture coefficient of 2 × 10–9 cm3 s–1. This estimate of the capture coefficient
is within 1 order of magnitude of our calculated value for the anharmonic
PES.We observe a striking asymmetry between the electron capture
barrier
(148 meV) and the hole capture barrier (924 meV). This is due to the
large lattice relaxation associated with iodine rearrangement upon
electron capture. The asymmetry provides an explanation for the low
trap-assisted recombination rate. Although electron capture at the
neutral interstitial is fast, the subsequent capture of a hole at
the negative iodine interstitial is energetically inaccessible for
thermal electrons.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the soft
nature of halideperovskites results in
strong electron–phonon coupling and a large displacement of
the surrounding inorganic octahedra following electron capture. This
relaxation process leads to a giant Huang–Rhys factor and facilitates
fast nonradiative electron capture.We expect to find similarly
large, anharmonic lattice relaxations
in other perovskites where dynamic octahedral tilting is evident (e.g.,
HC(NH2)2PbI3, FAPI[36]) and, more generally, in mechanically soft semiconductors
that are prone to structural disorder (e.g., metal–organic
frameworks). Defect tolerant perovskites (materials with low rates
of nonradiative recombination) may be engineered by suppressing octahedral
rotations in response to the changes in defect charge state. This
might be achieved through elemental substitutions that result in local
strain fields[37] or through defect engineering.[38]On the basis of our results, the electron
capture process at the
neutral iodine interstitial in MAPI is irreversible; it is energetically
unfavorable for the electron to be released into the band or annihilated
by a hole. An extension of this procedure to cover all native defects,
while being computationally demanding, would help to understand the
nature of nonradiative losses in halideperovskites solar cells, as
well as avenues to further enhance efficiency toward the radiative
limit.
Authors: Dane W deQuilettes; Kyle Frohna; David Emin; Thomas Kirchartz; Vladimir Bulovic; David S Ginger; Samuel D Stranks Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Christopher L Davies; Marina R Filip; Jay B Patel; Timothy W Crothers; Carla Verdi; Adam D Wright; Rebecca L Milot; Feliciano Giustino; Michael B Johnston; Laura M Herz Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 14.919