Literature DB >> 34102630

Motion estimation and correction in SPECT, PET and CT.

Andre Z Kyme1,2, Roger R Fulton3,4,2.   

Abstract

Patient motion impacts single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET) and x-ray computed tomography (CT) by giving rise to projection data inconsistencies that can manifest as reconstruction artifacts, thereby degrading image quality and compromising accurate image interpretation and quantification. Methods to estimate and correct for patient motion in SPECT, PET and CT have attracted considerable research effort over several decades. The aims of this effort have been two-fold: to estimate relevant motion fields characterizing the various forms of voluntary and involuntary motion; and to apply these motion fields within a modified reconstruction framework to obtain motion-corrected images. The aims of this review are to outline the motion problem in medical imaging and to critically review published methods for estimating and correcting for the relevant motion fields in clinical and preclinical SPECT, PET and CT. Despite many similarities in how motion is handled between these modalities, utility and applications vary based on differences in temporal and spatial resolution. Technical feasibility has been demonstrated in each modality for both rigid and non-rigid motion but clinical feasibility remains an important target. There is considerable scope for further developments in motion estimation and correction, and particularly in data-driven methods that will aid clinical utility. State-of-the-art deep learning methods may have a unique role to play in this context. Creative Commons Attribution license.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET and CT; SPECT; motion compensation; motion correction; motion estimation; motion tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34102630     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac093b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  3D Kinect Camera Scheme with Time-Series Deep-Learning Algorithms for Classification and Prediction of Lung Tumor Motility.

Authors:  Utumporn Puangragsa; Jiraporn Setakornnukul; Pittaya Dankulchai; Pattarapong Phasukkit
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Evaluating different methods of MR-based motion correction in simultaneous PET/MR using a head phantom moved by a robotic system.

Authors:  Eric Einspänner; Thies H Jochimsen; Osama Sabri; Bernhard Sattler; Johanna Harries; Andreas Melzer; Michael Unger; Richard Brown; Kris Thielemans
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-03-03

Review 3.  Hepatic Positron Emission Tomography: Applications in Metabolism, Haemodynamics and Cancer.

Authors:  Miikka-Juhani Honka; Eleni Rebelos; Simona Malaspina; Pirjo Nuutila
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-04-02

4.  Motion correction and its impact on quantification in dynamic total-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET.

Authors:  Tao Sun; Yaping Wu; Wei Wei; Fangfang Fu; Nan Meng; Hongzhao Chen; Xiaochen Li; Yan Bai; Zhenguo Wang; Jie Ding; Debin Hu; Chaojie Chen; Zhanli Hu; Dong Liang; Xin Liu; Hairong Zheng; Yongfeng Yang; Yun Zhou; Meiyun Wang
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-09-14

5.  Data-driven head motion correction for PET using time-of-flight and positron emission particle tracking techniques.

Authors:  Tasmia Rahman Tumpa; Shelley N Acuff; Jens Gregor; Yong Bradley; Yitong Fu; Dustin R Osborne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Comparison between a dual-time-window protocol and other simplified protocols for dynamic total-body 18F-FDG PET imaging.

Authors:  Zhenguo Wang; Yaping Wu; Xiaochen Li; Yan Bai; Hongzhao Chen; Jie Ding; Chushu Shen; Zhanli Hu; Dong Liang; Xin Liu; Hairong Zheng; Yongfeng Yang; Yun Zhou; Meiyun Wang; Tao Sun
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-09-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.