| Literature DB >> 34101255 |
Danny Linggonegoro1,2, Renajd Rrapi1,2, Sepideh Ashrafzadeh1,2, Lindsay McCormack1,3, Diana Bartenstein1,4, T J Hazen1,2, Abigail Kempf1,2, Eun Jae Kim1,2, Kevin Moore1,4, Xavier Sanchez-Flores1,2, Hannah Song1,4, Jennifer T Huang1,2, Sadaf Hussain1,2.
Abstract
A virtual pediatric dermatology student-run clinic was initiated during the COVID-19 pandemic, when in-person educational opportunities were limited. The clinic's aim is to provide high-quality dermatologic care to a diverse, underserved pediatric patient population while teaching trainees how to diagnose and manage common skin conditions. In our initial eight sessions, we served 37 patients, predominantly those with skin of color, and had a low no-show rate of 9.8%. This report describes the general structure of the clinic, goals, and the patient population to provide an overview of our educational model for those interested in similar efforts.Entities:
Keywords: dermatology; education; pediatric; student clinic; teledermatology; underserved communities
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34101255 PMCID: PMC8236992 DOI: 10.1111/pde.14653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Dermatol ISSN: 0736-8046 Impact factor: 1.997
FIGURE 1Summary of clinic member goals and workflow. *This is one of the first medical school patient interviews for our pre‐clinical volunteers and their first dermatology exposure under the direct supervision of the resident/fellow and attending. To ensure a high standard of dermatological care, we allocated a 45‐minute slot for each patient that included pre‐rounding preparation, thorough management discussion with the patient, and post‐visit teaching. This time allotment can be shortened for more experienced trainees
Baseline Characteristics and Dermatologic Conditions of the Patients Seen in the Clinic from July 2020 to February 2021
| Patient demographics | N = 37 (%) |
|---|---|
| Age groups | |
| Age 0‐5 years | 16 (43.2%) |
| Age 6‐10 years | 7 (18.9%) |
| Age 11+ years | 14 (37.8%) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 16 (43.2%) |
| Female | 21 (56.8%) |
| Race/Ethnicity | |
| White | 2 (5.4%) |
| Black | 10 (27.0%) |
| Asian | 4 (10.8%) |
| Hispanic | 15 (40.5%) |
| Other | 3 (8.1%) |
| Unknown/Not recorded | 3 (8.1%) |
| Primary language | |
| English | 24 (64.9%) |
| Spanish | 8 (21.6%) |
| Other | 5 (13.5%) |
| Dermatological findings | |
| Atopic dermatitis | 6 (13.0%) |
| Contact dermatitis | 6 (13.0%) |
| Seborrheic dermatitis | 5 (10.9%) |
| Acne vulgaris | 4 (8.7%) |
| Birthmarks | 3 (6.5%) |
| Molluscum contagiosum | 2 (4.3%) |
| Tinea capitis | 2 (4.3%) |
| Vitiligo | 2 (4.3%) |
| Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation | 2 (4.3%) |
| Other inflammatory conditions | 6 (13.0%) |
| Other | 8 (17.4%) |
Includes Black or other Hispanic. There were no White, Asian, Native American, or Native Hawaiian Hispanic.
These conditions included dermal melanocytosis, genetic syndromes, and congenital lacrimal fistula
These conditions included friction dermatitis, irritant diaper dermatitis, juvenile plantar dermatosis, keratosis pilaris, and pityrosporum folliculitis
These conditions included acanthosis nigricans, common acquired nevi, ganglion cyst, knuckle pad, lipoma, pyogenic granuloma, and telogen effluvium