Literature DB >> 34101034

Bone characteristics and metabolic phenotypes of obesity in an Iranian Elderly population: Bushehr Elderly Health Program (BEHP).

Farzaneh Amininezhad1, Moloud Payab2, Farshad Sharifi3, Afshin Ostovar4, Neda Mehrdad5,6, Ramin Heshmat7, Alireza Hadizadeh8, Mohammad Bagherzadeh9, Gita Shafiee7, Zhaleh Shadman3, Sedigheh Ziaei10, Firouzeh Hajipour1, Patricia Khashayar11, Iraj Nabipour12, Bagher Larijani13, Mahbube Ebrahimpur14.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Obesity and osteoporosis are health problems with high impact on the morbidity and mortality rate. While the association between BMI and bone density is known, the combined effects of obesity and metabolic components on bone health have not yet been revealed. The objectives of this study were to determine the association between bone health and different phenotypes of obesity in an elderly population.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on the data collected in the Bushehr Elderly Health Program (BEHP). The participants were classified in four groups based on the metabolic phenotypes of obesity (metabolic healthy obese (MHO), metabolic non-healthy non-obese (MNHNO), metabolic non-healthy obese (MNHO), and metabolic healthy non-obese (MHNO)). The association between osteoporosis and TBS and the metabolic phenotypes of obesity were assessed using multiple variable logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Totally, 2378 people (1227 women) were considered for analyses. The prevalence of MHNO, MHO, MNHNO, and MNHO were 902 (39.9%), 138 (6.1%), 758 (33.5%), and 464 (20.5%), respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression models, those with MHO (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.12-0.36), MNHNO (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.4-0.66), and MNHO phenotypes (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.16-0.3) had a significantly lower risk of osteoporosis. Likewise, those having MHO (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.51-3.76), MNHNO (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.11-2), and MNHO (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.82-3.42) phenotypes were found to had higher risk of low bone quality as confirmed by TBS.
CONCLUSIONS: The obese subjects have lower bone quality, regardless of their obesity phenotype.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal obesity; General obesity; Metabolic phenotype; Metabolic syndrome; Obesity; Osteoporosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34101034     DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00953-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  4 in total

Review 1.  Obesity and fracture risk.

Authors:  Stefano Gonnelli; Carla Caffarelli; Ranuccio Nuti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-01

2.  The reference value of trabecular bone score (TBS) in the Iranian population.

Authors:  Gita Shafiee; Farshad Sharifi; Ramin Heshmat; Afshin Ostovar; Mahbube Ebrahimpur; Ali Sheidaei; Iraj Nabipour; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2020-05-11

Review 3.  Prevalence of osteoporosis in Iran: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amin Doosti Irani; Jalal Poorolajal; Alireza Khalilian; Nader Esmailnasab; Zahra Cheraghi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Bushehr Elderly Health (BEH) programme: study protocol and design of musculoskeletal system and cognitive function (stage II).

Authors:  Gita Shafiee; Afshin Ostovar; Ramin Heshmat; Hossein Darabi; Farshad Sharifi; Alireza Raeisi; Neda Mehrdad; Zhaleh Shadman; Faride Razi; Mohammad Reza Amini; Seyed Masoud Arzaghi; Hamidreza Aghaei Meybodi; Akbar Soltani; Iraj Nabipour; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.