Jonathan D Cogen1, Anna V Faino2, Frankline Onchiri2, Lucas R Hoffman1, Matthew P Kronman3, David P Nichols1, Margaret Rosenfeld1, Ronald L Gibson1. 1. Division of Pulmonary & Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 2. Children's Core for Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Analytics in Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) are associated with significant morbidity. While standard PEx treatment for PwCF with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection includes two IV antipseudomonal antibiotics, little evidence exists to recommend this approach. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of single versus double antipseudomonal antibiotic use for PEx treatment. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the linked CF Foundation Patient Registry-Pediatric Health Information System dataset. PwCF were included if hospitalized between 2007 and 2018 and 6-21 years of age. Regression modeling accounting for repeated measures was used to compare lung function outcomes between single versus double IV antipseudomonal antibiotic regimens using propensity-score weighting to adjust for relevant confounding factors. RESULTS: Among 10,660 PwCF in the dataset, we analyzed 2,578 PEx from 1,080 PwCF, of which 455 and 2,123 PEx were treated with 1 versus 2 IV antipseudomonal antibiotics, respectively. We identified no significant differences between PEx treated with 1 versus 2 IV antipseudomonal antibiotics either in change between pre- and post-PEx percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV1) (-0.84%, [95% CI -2.25, 0.56]; P = 0.24), odds of returning to ≥90% of baseline ppFEV1 within 3 months following PEx (Odds Ratio 0.83, [95% CI 0.61, 1.13]; P = 0.24) or time to next PEx requiring IV antibiotics (Hazard Ratio 1.04, [95% CI 0.87, 1.24]; P = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Use of 2 IV antipseudomonal antibiotics for PEx treatment in young PwCF was not associated with greater improvements in measured respiratory and clinical outcomes compared to treatment with 1 IV antipseudomonal antibiotic.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) are associated with significant morbidity. While standard PEx treatment for PwCF with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection includes two IV antipseudomonal antibiotics, little evidence exists to recommend this approach. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of single versus double antipseudomonal antibiotic use for PEx treatment. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the linked CF Foundation Patient Registry-Pediatric Health Information System dataset. PwCF were included if hospitalized between 2007 and 2018 and 6-21 years of age. Regression modeling accounting for repeated measures was used to compare lung function outcomes between single versus double IV antipseudomonal antibiotic regimens using propensity-score weighting to adjust for relevant confounding factors. RESULTS: Among 10,660 PwCF in the dataset, we analyzed 2,578 PEx from 1,080 PwCF, of which 455 and 2,123 PEx were treated with 1 versus 2 IV antipseudomonal antibiotics, respectively. We identified no significant differences between PEx treated with 1 versus 2 IV antipseudomonal antibiotics either in change between pre- and post-PEx percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV1) (-0.84%, [95% CI -2.25, 0.56]; P = 0.24), odds of returning to ≥90% of baseline ppFEV1 within 3 months following PEx (Odds Ratio 0.83, [95% CI 0.61, 1.13]; P = 0.24) or time to next PEx requiring IV antibiotics (Hazard Ratio 1.04, [95% CI 0.87, 1.24]; P = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Use of 2 IV antipseudomonal antibiotics for PEx treatment in young PwCF was not associated with greater improvements in measured respiratory and clinical outcomes compared to treatment with 1 IV antipseudomonal antibiotic.
Authors: Martin Vestergaard; Wilhelm Paulander; Rasmus L Marvig; Julie Clasen; Nicholas Jochumsen; Søren Molin; Lars Jelsbak; Hanne Ingmer; Anders Folkesson Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2015-10-25 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: L Charles Bailey; Christopher B Forrest; Peixin Zhang; Thomas M Richards; Alice Livshits; Patricia A DeRusso Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: S L Heltshe; U Khan; V Beckett; A Baines; J Emerson; D B Sanders; R L Gibson; W Morgan; M Rosenfeld Journal: J Cyst Fibros Date: 2017-10-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Patrick A Flume; Peter J Mogayzel; Karen A Robinson; Christopher H Goss; Randall L Rosenblatt; Robert J Kuhn; Bruce C Marshall Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Emily A Knapp; Aliza K Fink; Christopher H Goss; Ase Sewall; Josh Ostrenga; Christopher Dowd; Alexander Elbert; Kristofer M Petren; Bruce C Marshall Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-07