Literature DB >> 34100202

Transforming faces to mimic natural kin: A comparison of different paradigms.

Christophe A H Bousquet1, Gwenaël Kaminski2,3.   

Abstract

The ability to detect phenotypic similarity or kinship in third-parties' faces is not perfect, but better than chance. Still, some humans are better than others at this task. Yet researchers in kinship detection have difficulties in building up large and diverse datasets of high-quality pictures of related persons. The current experiments tested a novel method for circumventing this difficulty by using morphing techniques in order to generate a wide array of stimuli derived from a limited number of individual pictures. Six experiments tested various stimuli (standard protocol, mirrored face, other-sex face, other-ethnicity face, other-expression face and antiface). Our benchmarks are the similarity or kinship scores achieved by participants when faced with pictures of real siblings. We show that all stimuli, except the antiface, elicit detection scores similar to those elicited by real pictures of actual siblings. In addition, by exploring different experiment parameters (simultaneous or sequential task, kinship or similarity task) and some individual characteristics, these experiments provide a better understanding of kinship detection in third parties. The validation of our new method will allow widening the range of available stimuli to the research community, and even to develop new ecologically relevant experimental protocols that are hardly or not feasible with veridical images.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kinship detection; Morphed faces; Natural siblings; Similarity detection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34100202     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01614-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  29 in total

1.  Identification of visual paternity cues in humans.

Authors:  Alexandra Alvergne; Fanny Perreau; Allan Mazur; Ulrich Mueller; Michel Raymond
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Opposite-sex siblings decrease attraction, but not prosocial attributions, to self-resembling opposite-sex faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; Christopher D Watkins; S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little; Finlay G Smith; Michelle C Quist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Talis pater, talis filius: perceived resemblance and the belief in genetic relatedness.

Authors:  Paola Bressan; Maria F Dal Martello
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-05

4.  Fathers see stronger family resemblances than non-fathers in unrelated children's faces.

Authors:  Paola Bressan; Stefania Dal Pos
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2012-06-14

Review 5.  Social perception of facial resemblance in humans.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; Anthony C Little; David I Perrett
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-02

6.  Longitudinal changes in the adult facial profile.

Authors:  W A Formby; R S Nanda; G F Currier
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Cross-cultural perceptions of facial resemblance between kin.

Authors:  Alexandra Alvergne; Ryo Oda; Charlotte Faurie; Akiko Matsumoto-Oda; Valérie Durand; Michel Raymond
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Human kin recognition is self- rather than family-referential.

Authors:  Paola Bressan; Guendalina Zucchi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Kin recognition signals in adult faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Finlay G Smith; Benedict C Jones; S Craig Roberts; Marion Petrie; Tim D Spector
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Kinship recognition by unrelated observers depends on implicit and explicit cognition.

Authors:  Joana Arantes; Mark E Berg
Journal:  Evol Psychol       Date:  2012-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.