Literature DB >> 34099991

Gender Differences Among Milestone Assessments in a National Sample of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Programs.

Noel S Zuckerbraun1, Kelly Levasseur2, Maybelle Kou3, Jerri A Rose4, Cindy G Roskind5, Tien Vu6, Aline Baghdassarian7, Kathryn Leonard8, Veronika Shabanova9, Melissa L Langhan9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding gender gaps in trainee evaluations is critical because these may ultimately determine the duration of training. Currently, no studies describe the influence of gender on the evaluation of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare milestone scores of female versus male PEM fellows.
METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study of a national sample of PEM fellows from July 2014 to June 2018. Accreditation Council for Medical Education (ACGME) subcompetencies are scored on a 5-point scale and span six domains: patient care (PC), medical knowledge, systems-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, professionalism, and interpersonal and communication skills (ICS). Summative assessments of the 23 PEM subcompetencies are assigned by each program's clinical competency committee and submitted semiannually for each fellow. Program directors voluntarily provided deidentified ACGME milestone reports. Demographics including sex, program region, and type of residency were collected. Descriptive analysis of milestones was performed for each year of fellowship. Multivariate analyses evaluated the difference in scores by sex for each of the subcompetencies.
RESULTS: Forty-eight geographically diverse programs participated, yielding data for 639 fellows (66% of all PEM fellows nationally); sex was recorded for 604 fellows, of whom 67% were female. When comparing the mean milestone scores in each of the six domains, there were no differences by sex in any year of training. When comparing scores within each of the 23 subcompetencies and correcting the significance level for comparison of multiple milestones, the scores for PC3 and ICS2 were significantly, albeit not meaningfully, higher for females.
CONCLUSION: In a national sample of PEM fellows, we found no major differences in milestone scores between females and males.
© 2020 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 34099991      PMCID: PMC8166301          DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AEM Educ Train        ISSN: 2472-5390


  16 in total

1.  The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits.

Authors:  Thomas J Nasca; Ingrid Philibert; Timothy Brigham; Timothy C Flynn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  How Do Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Structure Their Clinical Competency Committees? A Survey.

Authors:  Christopher I Doty; Lynn P Roppolo; Shellie Asher; Jason P Seamon; Rahul Bhat; Stephanie Taft; Autumn Graham; James Willis
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Comparison of Male vs Female Resident Milestone Evaluations by Faculty During Emergency Medicine Residency Training.

Authors:  Arjun Dayal; Daniel M O'Connor; Usama Qadri; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  The effects of gender and age on evaluation of trainees and faculty in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Erin W Thackeray; Andrew J Halvorsen; Robert D Ficalora; Gregory J Engstler; Furman S McDonald; Amy S Oxentenko
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Women in academic emergency medicine.

Authors:  R K Cydulka; G D'Onofrio; S Schneider; C L Emerman; L M Sullivan
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Women in Pediatrics: Progress, Barriers, and Opportunities for Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion.

Authors:  Nancy D Spector; Philomena A Asante; Jasmine R Marcelin; Julie A Poorman; Allison R Larson; Arghavan Salles; Amy S Oxentenko; Julie K Silver
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Effect of evaluator and resident gender on the American Board of Internal Medicine evaluation scores.

Authors:  V E Rand; E S Hudes; W S Browner; R M Wachter; A L Avins
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  The association of faculty and residents' gender on faculty evaluations of internal medicine residents in 16 residencies.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Stephen J Huot; Rebecca S Brienza; Richard E Hawkins
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Gender Bias in Simulation-Based Assessments of Emergency Medicine Residents.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Siegelman; Michelle Lall; Lindsay Lee; Tim P Moran; Joshua Wallenstein; Bijal Shah
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-08

10.  Implicit gender bias among US resident physicians.

Authors:  Matt Hansen; Amanda Schoonover; Barbara Skarica; Tabria Harrod; Nathan Bahr; Jeanne-Marie Guise
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  1 in total

1.  Gender differences in emergency medicine resident assessment: A scoping review.

Authors:  Isabella Menchetti; Debra Eagles; Dana Ghanem; Jennifer Leppard; Karine Fournier; Warren J Cheung
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2022-09-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.