Literature DB >> 34099764

Prognostic influences of BCL1 and BCL2 expression on disease-free survival in breast cancer.

Ki-Tae Hwang1, Young A Kim2, Jongjin Kim3, Hyeon Jeong Oh4, Jeong Hwan Park2, In Sil Choi5, Jin Hyun Park5, Sohee Oh6, Ajung Chu7, Jong Yoon Lee7, Kyu Ri Hwang8.   

Abstract

We investigated the prognostic influences of BCL1 and BCL2 expression on disease-free survival in breast cancer patients. BCL1 and BCL2 expression statuses were assessed by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarrays from 393 breast cancer patients. The Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test were used for survival analyses. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of survival analyses. BCL1 expression revealed no impact on survival. The high BCL2 group showed superior disease-free survival compared with the low BCL2 group (p = 0.002), especially regarding local recurrence-free survival (p = 0.045) and systemic recurrence-free survival (p = 0.002). BCL2 expression was a significant prognostic factor by univariable analysis (HR, 0.528; 95% CI, 0.353-0.790; p = 0.002) and by multivariable analysis (HR, 0.547; 95% CI, 0.362-0.826; p = 0.004). High BCL2 expression was associated with higher disease-free survival in the hormone receptor (HRc)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (HRc(+)/HER2(-)) subtype only (p = 0.002). The high BCL2 group was associated with positive estrogen receptor (ER), positive progesterone receptor (PR), low histologic grade, and age ≤ 50 years. BCL1 expression had no prognostic impact, but BCL2 expression was a significant independent prognostic factor. High BCL2 expression was associated with higher disease-free survival, especially regarding local recurrence and systemic recurrence. The prognostic effect of BCL2 expression was effective only in the HRc(+)/HER2(-) subtype. Favorable clinicopathologic features and a strong association with the ER/PR status could partly explain the superior prognosis of the high BCL2 group. BCL2 expression could be utilized to assess the prognosis of breast cancer patients in clinical settings.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34099764     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90506-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  41 in total

Review 1.  Control of apoptosis by the BCL-2 protein family: implications for physiology and therapy.

Authors:  Peter E Czabotar; Guillaume Lessene; Andreas Strasser; Jerry M Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of cyclin D1 amplification in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi He; Jingxun Wu; Xin-Li Liu; Yi-Han Ma; Xiao-Ting Wu; Wen-Yi Wang; Han-Xiang An
Journal:  J BUON       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.533

3.  Bcl-2 induces cyclin D1 promoter activity in human breast epithelial cells independent of cell anchorage.

Authors:  H M Lin; Y J Lee; G Li; R G Pestell; H R Kim
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 4.  Overview of cyclins D1 function in cancer and the CDK inhibitor landscape: past and present.

Authors:  Mathew C Casimiro; Marco Velasco-Velázquez; Charmina Aguirre-Alvarado; Richard G Pestell
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 6.206

5.  Overexpression of cyclin D1 messenger RNA predicts for poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  F S Kenny; R Hui; E A Musgrove; J M Gee; R W Blamey; R I Nicholson; R L Sutherland; J F Robertson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Cyclin DI amplification is not associated with reduced overall survival in primary breast cancer but may predict early relapse in patients with features of good prognosis.

Authors:  R Seshadri; C S Lee; R Hui; K McCaul; D J Horsfall; R L Sutherland
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Signaling through cyclin D-dependent kinases.

Authors:  Y J Choi; L Anders
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 8.  Nuclear cyclin D1: an oncogenic driver in human cancer.

Authors:  Jong Kyong Kim; J Alan Diehl
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 9.  The BCL-2 arbiters of apoptosis and their growing role as cancer targets.

Authors:  Jerry M Adams; Suzanne Cory
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 15.828

10.  High expression of cyclin D1 is associated to high proliferation rate and increased risk of mortality in women with ER-positive but not in ER-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Cecilia Ahlin; Claudia Lundgren; Elin Embretsén-Varro; Karin Jirström; Carl Blomqvist; M -L Fjällskog
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.