Literature DB >> 34099030

Does one heavy load back squat set lead to postactivation performance enhancement of three-point explosion and sprint in third division American football players?

Robert Bielitzki1, Daniel Hamacher2, Astrid Zech2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: American football players need the ability to provide maximal muscular power in a modicum of time. Postactivation performance enhancement (PAPE), which is characterized by an acute improvement of a performance measure following conditioning contractions, could be of value for American football players. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of a heavy load back squat PAPE protocol on three-point explosion (TPE; an essential blocking technique and drill) and 40-yard dash (40YD) performance compared to a traditional warm-up in American football players.
METHODS: In a crossover study design, eighteen male competitive regional league American football players (mean ± SD: body mass 93.9 ± 15.5 kg, height 181.4 ± 6.8 cm, age 24.8 ± 3.9 years) performed a TPE on a double blocking sled (weight: 150 kg) and a 40YD (36.6 m with a 5 and 10 m split) 8 min after two different warm-up conditions. One condition was a traditional, football specific warm-up (TWU) consisting of game related movements (e.g. backward lunges, lateral power steps), whereas the other condition (PAPE) consisted of three explosive back squats with a load of 91 % one-repetition maximum.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in TPE between TWU and PAPE. For the 40YD, we found significantly shorter sprint times in the PAPE condition with medium effect sizes for the 5 m (p = 0.007; r = 0.45) and 10 m (p = 0.020; r = 0.39) but not for the whole 36.6 m distance (p = 0.084; r = 0.29) compared to the TWU condition.
CONCLUSIONS: The used heavy load back squat PAPE protocol improved sprint performance over short distances (≤ 10 m) but not complex movements like the three-point explosion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blocking; conditioning contraction; postactivation potentiation; sprint performance; squat

Year:  2021        PMID: 34099030     DOI: 10.1186/s13102-021-00288-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil        ISSN: 2052-1847


  6 in total

1.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Can different conditioning activities and rest intervals affect the acute performance of taekwondo turning kick?

Authors:  Jonatas F da Silva Santos; Tomás H Valenzuela; Emerson Franchini
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  The effects of rest intervals on jumping performance: a meta-analysis on post-activation potentiation studies.

Authors:  André Luiz Gouvêa; Igor Alexandre Fernandes; Eurico Peixoto César; Wagner Antônio Barbosa Silva; Paulo Sergio Chagas Gomes
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  The effects of varying time under tension and volume load on acute neuromuscular responses.

Authors:  Quan T Tran; David Docherty; David Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Post-activation Potentiation Versus Post-activation Performance Enhancement in Humans: Historical Perspective, Underlying Mechanisms, and Current Issues.

Authors:  Anthony J Blazevich; Nicolas Babault
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Time to Differentiate Postactivation "Potentiation" from "Performance Enhancement" in the Strength and Conditioning Community.

Authors:  Olaf Prieske; Martin Behrens; Helmi Chaabene; Urs Granacher; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 11.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.