Frédérique Vallières1, Paul Mubiri2, Samuel Agyei Agyemang3, Samuel Amon3, Jana Gerold4,5, Tim Martineau6, Ann Nolan1, Thomasena O'Byrne1, Lifah Sanudi7, Freddie Sengooba2, Helen Prytherch8,9. 1. Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland. 2. School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. 3. School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, P. O. Box LG13, Accra, Ghana. 4. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. jana.gerold@swisstph.ch. 5. University of Basel, 4003, Basel, Switzerland. jana.gerold@swisstph.ch. 6. Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom. 7. Research for Equity and Community Health Trust (REACH Trust), Lilongwe, Malawi. 8. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. 9. University of Basel, 4003, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Safety climate is an essential component of achieving Universal Health Coverage, with several organisational, unit or team-level, and individual health worker factors identified as influencing safety climate. Few studies however, have investigated how these factors contribute to safety climate within health care settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The current study examines the relationship between key organisational, unit and individual-level factors and safety climate across primary health care centres in Ghana, Malawi and Uganda. METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered survey was conducted across 138 primary health care facilities in nine districts across Uganda, Ghana and Malawi. In total, 760 primary health workers completed the questionnaire. The relationships between individual (sex, job satisfaction), unit (teamwork climate, supportive supervision), organisational-level (district managerial support) and safety climate were tested using structural equation modelling (SEM) procedures. Post hoc analyses were also carried out to explore these relationships within each country. RESULTS: Our model including all countries explained 55% of the variance in safety climate. In this model, safety climate was most strongly associated with teamwork (β = 0.56, p < 0.001), supportive supervision (β = 0.34, p < 0.001), and district managerial support (β = 0.29, p < 0.001). In Ghana, safety climate was positively associated with job satisfaction (β = 0.30, p < 0.05), teamwork (β = 0.46, p < 0.001), and supportive supervision (β = 0.21, p < 0.05), whereby the model explained 43% of the variance in safety climate. In Uganda, the total variance explained by the model was 64%, with teamwork (β = 0.56, p < 0.001), supportive supervision (β = 0.43, p < 0.001), and perceived district managerial support (β = 0.35, p < 0.001) all found to be positively associated with climate. In Malawi, the total variance explained by the model was 63%, with teamwork (β = 0.39, p = 0.005) and supportive supervision (β = 0.27, p = 0.023) significantly and positively associated with safety climate. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the importance of unit-level factors-and in specific, teamwork and supportive supervision-as particularly important contributors to perceptions of safety climate among primary health workers in LMICs. Implications for practice are discussed.
BACKGROUND: Safety climate is an essential component of achieving Universal Health Coverage, with several organisational, unit or team-level, and individual health worker factors identified as influencing safety climate. Few studies however, have investigated how these factors contribute to safety climate within health care settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The current study examines the relationship between key organisational, unit and individual-level factors and safety climate across primary health care centres in Ghana, Malawi and Uganda. METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered survey was conducted across 138 primary health care facilities in nine districts across Uganda, Ghana and Malawi. In total, 760 primary health workers completed the questionnaire. The relationships between individual (sex, job satisfaction), unit (teamwork climate, supportive supervision), organisational-level (district managerial support) and safety climate were tested using structural equation modelling (SEM) procedures. Post hoc analyses were also carried out to explore these relationships within each country. RESULTS: Our model including all countries explained 55% of the variance in safety climate. In this model, safety climate was most strongly associated with teamwork (β = 0.56, p < 0.001), supportive supervision (β = 0.34, p < 0.001), and district managerial support (β = 0.29, p < 0.001). In Ghana, safety climate was positively associated with job satisfaction (β = 0.30, p < 0.05), teamwork (β = 0.46, p < 0.001), and supportive supervision (β = 0.21, p < 0.05), whereby the model explained 43% of the variance in safety climate. In Uganda, the total variance explained by the model was 64%, with teamwork (β = 0.56, p < 0.001), supportive supervision (β = 0.43, p < 0.001), and perceived district managerial support (β = 0.35, p < 0.001) all found to be positively associated with climate. In Malawi, the total variance explained by the model was 63%, with teamwork (β = 0.39, p = 0.005) and supportive supervision (β = 0.27, p = 0.023) significantly and positively associated with safety climate. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the importance of unit-level factors-and in specific, teamwork and supportive supervision-as particularly important contributors to perceptions of safety climate among primary health workers in LMICs. Implications for practice are discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Low- and middle-income countries; Primary health; Safety climate
Authors: Margaret E Kruk; Anna D Gage; Catherine Arsenault; Keely Jordan; Hannah H Leslie; Sanam Roder-DeWan; Olusoji Adeyi; Pierre Barker; Bernadette Daelmans; Svetlana V Doubova; Mike English; Ezequiel García-Elorrio; Frederico Guanais; Oye Gureje; Lisa R Hirschhorn; Lixin Jiang; Edward Kelley; Ephrem Tekle Lemango; Jerker Liljestrand; Address Malata; Tanya Marchant; Malebona Precious Matsoso; John G Meara; Manoj Mohanan; Youssoupha Ndiaye; Ole F Norheim; K Srinath Reddy; Alexander K Rowe; Joshua A Salomon; Gagan Thapa; Nana A Y Twum-Danso; Muhammad Pate Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Mamuka Djibuti; George Gotsadze; Akaki Zoidze; George Mataradze; Laura C Esmail; Jillian Clare Kohler Journal: BMC Int Health Hum Rights Date: 2009-10-14
Authors: Solvejg Kristensen; Antje Hammer; Paul Bartels; Rosa Suñol; Oliver Groene; Caroline A Thompson; Onyebuchi A Arah; Halina Kutaj-Wasikowska; Philippe Michel; Cordula Wagner Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: John B Sexton; Robert L Helmreich; Torsten B Neilands; Kathy Rowan; Keryn Vella; James Boyden; Peter R Roberts; Eric J Thomas Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2006-04-03 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Netsanet Fetene; Maureen E Canavan; Abraham Megentta; Erika Linnander; Annabel X Tan; Kidest Nadew; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 3.240