Kathryn Ogden1, Sue Kilpatrick2, Shandell Elmer2,3, Kim Rooney4. 1. Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Locked bag 1377, Launceston, Tasmania, 7250, Australia. Kathryn.Ogden@utas.edu.au. 2. School of Education, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia. 3. Centre for Global Health and Equity, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia. 4. Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Locked bag 1377, Launceston, Tasmania, 7250, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medical education should ensure graduates are equipped for practice in modern health-care systems. Practicing effectively in complex health-care systems requires contemporary attributes and competencies, complementing core clinical competencies. These need to be made overt and opportunities to develop and practice them provided. This study explicates these attributes and generic competencies using Group Concept Mapping, aiming to inform pre-vocational medical education curriculum development. METHODS: Group Concept Mapping is a mixed methods consensus building methodology whereby ideas are generated using qualitative techniques, sorted and grouped using hierarchical cluster analysis, and rated to provide further quantitative confirmation of value. Health service providers from varied disciplines (including medicine, nursing, allied health), health profession educators, health managers, and service users contributed to the conceptual model's development. They responded to the prompt 'An attribute or non-clinical competency required of doctors for effective practice in modern health-care systems is...' and grouped the synthesized responses according to similarity. Data were subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis. Junior doctors rated competencies according to importance to their practice and preparedness at graduation. RESULTS: Sixty-seven contributors generated 338 responses which were synthesised into 60 statements. Hierarchical cluster analysis resulted in a conceptual map of seven clusters representing: value-led professionalism; attributes for self-awareness and reflective practice; cognitive capability; active engagement; communication to build and manage relationships; patient-centredness and advocacy; and systems awareness, thinking and contribution. Logic model transformation identified three overarching meta-competencies: leadership and systems thinking; learning and cognitive processes; and interpersonal capability. Ratings indicated that junior doctors believe system-related competencies are less important than other competencies, and they feel less prepared to carry them out. CONCLUSION: The domains that have been identified highlight the competencies necessary for effective practice for those who work within and use health-care systems. Three overarching domains relate to leadership in systems, learning, and interpersonal competencies. The model is a useful adjunct to broader competencies frameworks because of the focus on generic competencies that are crucial in modern complex adaptive health-care systems. Explicating these will allow future investigation into those that are currently well achieved, and those which are lacking, in differing contexts.
BACKGROUND: Medical education should ensure graduates are equipped for practice in modern health-care systems. Practicing effectively in complex health-care systems requires contemporary attributes and competencies, complementing core clinical competencies. These need to be made overt and opportunities to develop and practice them provided. This study explicates these attributes and generic competencies using Group Concept Mapping, aiming to inform pre-vocational medical education curriculum development. METHODS: Group Concept Mapping is a mixed methods consensus building methodology whereby ideas are generated using qualitative techniques, sorted and grouped using hierarchical cluster analysis, and rated to provide further quantitative confirmation of value. Health service providers from varied disciplines (including medicine, nursing, allied health), health profession educators, health managers, and service users contributed to the conceptual model's development. They responded to the prompt 'An attribute or non-clinical competency required of doctors for effective practice in modern health-care systems is...' and grouped the synthesized responses according to similarity. Data were subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis. Junior doctors rated competencies according to importance to their practice and preparedness at graduation. RESULTS: Sixty-seven contributors generated 338 responses which were synthesised into 60 statements. Hierarchical cluster analysis resulted in a conceptual map of seven clusters representing: value-led professionalism; attributes for self-awareness and reflective practice; cognitive capability; active engagement; communication to build and manage relationships; patient-centredness and advocacy; and systems awareness, thinking and contribution. Logic model transformation identified three overarching meta-competencies: leadership and systems thinking; learning and cognitive processes; and interpersonal capability. Ratings indicated that junior doctors believe system-related competencies are less important than other competencies, and they feel less prepared to carry them out. CONCLUSION: The domains that have been identified highlight the competencies necessary for effective practice for those who work within and use health-care systems. Three overarching domains relate to leadership in systems, learning, and interpersonal competencies. The model is a useful adjunct to broader competencies frameworks because of the focus on generic competencies that are crucial in modern complex adaptive health-care systems. Explicating these will allow future investigation into those that are currently well achieved, and those which are lacking, in differing contexts.
Entities:
Keywords:
Attributes; Delivery of health services; Generic competencies; Group concept mapping; Medical education
Authors: Julio Frenk; Lincoln Chen; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Jordan Cohen; Nigel Crisp; Timothy Evans; Harvey Fineberg; Patricia Garcia; Yang Ke; Patrick Kelley; Barry Kistnasamy; Afaf Meleis; David Naylor; Ariel Pablos-Mendez; Srinath Reddy; Susan Scrimshaw; Jaime Sepulveda; David Serwadda; Huda Zurayk Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ian S Graham; Andrew J Gleason; Gregory W Keogh; Deborah Paltridge; Ian R Rogers; Merrilyn Walton; Caroline De Paola; Jagdishwar Singh; Barry P McGrath Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2007-04-02 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Rika Maeshiro; Ian Johnson; Denise Koo; Jean Parboosingh; Jan K Carney; Neil Gesundheit; Evelyn T Ho; David Butler-Jones; Denise Donovan; Jonathan A Finkelstein; Nancy M Bennett; Barbie Shore; Stephen A McCurdy; Lloyd F Novick; Lily Dow Velarde; M Marie Dent; Ann Banchoff; Laurence Cohen Journal: Acad Med Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Paul A Hemmer; Nick Busing; John R Boulet; William P Burdick; James McKillop; David Irby; Elizabeth Ann Farmer; Robbert Duvivier Journal: Med Teach Date: 2011 Impact factor: 3.650