Literature DB >> 34098901

Cancer-specific survival by stage of bladder cancer and factors collected by Mallorca Cancer Registry associated to survival.

J Ripoll1, M Ramos2, J Montaño3, J Pons4, A Ameijide5, P Franch4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information about survival by stage in bladder cancer is scarce, as well as about survival of non-invasive bladder cancer. The aims of this study are: 1) to find out the distribution of bladder cancer by stage; 2) to determine cancer-specific survival by stage of bladder cancer; 3) to identify factors that explain and predict the likelihood of survival and the risk of dying from these cancers.
METHODS: Incident bladder cancer cases diagnosed between 2006 and 2011 were identified through the Mallorca Cancer Registry. INCLUSION CRITERIA: cases with code C67 according to the ICD-O 3rd edition with any behaviour and any histology, except lymphomas and small cell carcinomas. Cases identified exclusively through the death certificate were excluded. We collected the following data: sex; age; date and method of diagnosis; histology according to the ICD-O 3rd edition; T, N, M and stage at the time of diagnosis; and date of follow-up or death. End point of follow-up was 31 December 2015. Multiple imputation (MI) was performed to estimate cases with unknown stage. Cases with benign or indeterminate behaviour were excluded for the survival analysis. Actuarial and Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models were used for survival analysis.
RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred fourteen cases were identified. 14% were women and 65.4% were 65 years or older. 3.9% had no stage (benign or undetermined behaviour) and 11.5% had unknown stage. After MI, 37.5% were in stage Ta (non-invasive papillary carcinoma), 3.2% in stage Tis (carcinoma in situ), 34.3% in stage I, 11.7% in Stage II, 4.3% in stage III, and 9.0% in stage IV. Survival was 76% at 5 years. Survival by stage: 98% at stage Ta, 90% at stage Tis, 85% at stage I, 45% at stage II, 35% at stage III, and 7% at stage IV. The Cox model showed that age, histology, and stage, but not sex, were associated with survival.
CONCLUSION: Bladder cancer survival vary greatly with stage, among both non-invasive and invasive cases. The percentage of non-invasive cancers is high. Stage, age, and histology are associated to survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder neoplasms; Multiple imputation; Stage; Survival

Year:  2021        PMID: 34098901     DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08418-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  15 in total

1.  Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice.

Authors:  Ian R White; Patrick Royston; Angela M Wood
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Incidence, survival and mortality rates of stage-specific bladder cancer in United States: a trend analysis.

Authors:  Firas Abdollah; Giorgio Gandaglia; Rodolphe Thuret; Jan Schmitges; Zhe Tian; Claudio Jeldres; Niccolò Maria Passoni; Alberto Briganti; Shahrokh F Shariat; Paul Perrotte; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Maxine Sun
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 3.  Bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ashish M Kamat; Noah M Hahn; Jason A Efstathiou; Seth P Lerner; Per-Uno Malmström; Woonyoung Choi; Charles C Guo; Yair Lotan; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Targeted therapies in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer according to the signaling pathways.

Authors:  Hervé Wallerand; Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Stéphane Culine; Philippe Ballanger; Grégoire Robert; Robert E Reiter; Jean-Marie Ferrière; Alain Ravaud
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Bladder cancer survival: Women better off in the long run.

Authors:  Bettina Kulle Andreassen; Tom Kristian Grimsrud; Erik Skaaheim Haug
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Colorectal cancer survival by stage of cases diagnosed in Mallorca, Spain, between 2006 and 2011 and factors associated with survival.

Authors:  M Ramos; J Montaño; M Esteva; A Barceló; P Franch
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Incidence and Survival of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder in Norway 1981-2014.

Authors:  B K Andreassen; B Aagnes; R Gislefoss; M Andreassen; R Wahlqvist
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Missing data and multiple imputation in clinical epidemiological research.

Authors:  Alma B Pedersen; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Deirdre Cronin-Fenton; Nickolaj R Kristensen; Tra My Pham; Lars Pedersen; Irene Petersen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Trends in the incidence and mortality of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder for the last four decades in the USA: a SEER-based analysis.

Authors:  Muneer J Al-Husseini; Ahmad Kunbaz; Anas M Saad; João Vasco Santos; Sami Salahia; Marium Iqbal; Fares Alahdab
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  A comparison of relative survival and cause-specific survival methods to measure net survival in cancer populations.

Authors:  Nupur Makkar; Quinn T Ostrom; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  1 in total

1.  5-Methylcytosine-Related Long Noncoding RNAs Are Potential Biomarkers to Predict Overall Survival and Regulate Tumor-Immune Environment in Patients with Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Zhuoyuan Li; Siyu Wang; Yuxian Chen; Yaozhou Huang; Tianping Li
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.434

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.