| Literature DB >> 34098879 |
Yunong Wang1,2,3,4, Li Zhou2,3,4, Lele Wu2,3,4, Changbin Song5, Xiaona Ma2,3, Shihong Xu2,3, Tengfei Du2,3,4, Xian Li6,7,8, Jun Li2,3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As flatfish, turbot undergo metamorphosis as part of their life cycle. In the larval stage, turbot live at the ocean surface, but after metamorphosis they move to deeper water and turn to benthic life. Thus, the light environment differs greatly between life stages. The visual system plays a great role in organic evolution, but reports of the relationship between the visual system and benthic life are rare. In this study, we reported the molecular and evolutionary analysis of opsin genes in turbot, and the heterochronic shifts in opsin expression during development.Entities:
Keywords: Adaption; Benthic life; Heterochronic shift; Opsin; Turbot
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34098879 PMCID: PMC8186084 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-021-01837-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ecol Evol ISSN: 2730-7182
Fig. 1Phylogenetic relationships of the turbot opsin genes and other teleost opsin genes based on the maximum-likelihood method. The bootstrap test (1000 replicates) scores are shown on the nodes
Fig. 2Synteny analyses of visual opsin genes between turbot and five other teleost species (tongue sole, medaka, zebra mbuna, zebrafish, and guppy). a SWS1, b RH2, c LWS and SWS2, d RH1. Different gene families are represented by colored pentagons, and the direction of the pentagon indicates gene orientation. The dashed lines indicate that two adjacent genes in that species are not directly linked
Statistics of branch-specific model analysis of turbot and other teleost species
| Gene | lnL (1ω model) | lnL (free ω model) | Likelihood ratio test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| − 4964.165032 | − 4922.267355 | 83.795354 | < 0.001 | ||
| − 4253.724995 | − 4240.774669 | 25.900652 | 0.0391 | ||
| − 8001.473925 | − 7970.454002 | 62.039846 | < 0.001 | ||
| − 10,370.70927 | − 10,296.73427 | 147.949996 | < 0.001 | ||
| − 3734.012013 | − 3705.674753 | 56.67452 | < 0.001 | ||
The likelihood ratio test is to determine whether the free ω model fits the data significantly better than the one ω model. The ω for each branch are not shown. lnL ln likelihood
Parameter estimates of branch-site models and predicted positively selected sites
| Opsin | Clade | lnL | LRT | Positively selected sites | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Null | modelA | |||||
| RH2 | a | − 10,169.10 | − 10,169.10 | 0 | 1 | – |
| b | − 10,166.54 | − 10,164.23 | 4.62 | 0.0315 | 19 (0.881) 31 (0.628) 95 (0.945) 109 (0.882) 122 (0.511) 169 (0.501) 207 (0.966) 266 (0.604) 273 (0.949) 320 (0.578) | |
| c | − 10,169.10 | − 10,169.10 | 0 | 1 | – | |
| d | − 10,167.62 | − 10,165.03 | 5.16 | 0.0230 | 105 (0.612) 217 (0.993) | |
| e | − 10,168.60 | − 10,168.58 | 0.03 | 0.8636 | – | |
| f | − 10,166.92 | − 10,162.26 | 9.32 | 0.0022 | 49 (0.944) 95 (0.733) 270 (0.982) 307 (0.907) | |
| g | − 10,148.85 | − 10,136.84 | 24.01 | < 0.001 | 14 (0.875) 33 (0.514) 50 (0.946) 65 (0.770) 84 (0.948) 151 (0.523) 195 (0.951) 197 (0.845) 198 (0.600) 217 (0.945) 239 (0.528) 254 (0.952) 286 (0.502) 290 (0.594) 297 (0.581) 321 (0.757) 322 (0.966) 323 (0.990) 325 (0.979) 328 (0.649) 329(0.770) 330 (0.772) | |
| RH1 | a | − 3629.453904 | − 3625.696675 | 7.51 | 0.0061 | 35 (0.769) 126 (0.674) 196 (0.858) 210 (0.879) 235 (0.911) 236 (0.959) 281 (0.773) |
| b | − 3632.72 | − 3632.72 | 0 | 1 | – | |
| c | − 3632.72 | − 3632.72 | 0 | 1 | – | |
| d | − 3630.82 | − 3630.82 | 4E-06 | 1 | – | |
| SWS2 | a | − 7840.16 | − 7831.84 | 16.63 | < 0.001 | 2 (0.572) 5 (0.605) 10 (0.815) 14 (0.801) 15 (0.575) 21 (0.841) 22 (0.579) 25 (0.507) 27 (0.805) 42 (0.552) 44 (0.889) 45 (0.598) 51 (0.605) 55 (0.623) 87 (0.570) 88 (0.617) 91 (0.567) 95 (0.613) 99 (0.510) 123 (0.556) 125 (0.539) 156 (0.601)162 (0.619) 166 (0.598) 244 (0.600) 257 (0.600) 269 (0.670) 279 (0.604) 283 (0.853) 301 (0.685) 315 (0.708) 328 (0.858)329 (0.818) 332 (0.577) 335 (0.596) 339 (0.533) 341 (0.545) 346 (0.659) 349 (0.687) |
| b | − 7851.02 | − 7848.07 | 5.88 | 0.0152 | 38 (0.560) 99 (0.904) 276 (0.687) 299 (0.983) | |
| c | − 7852.17 | − 7850.19 | 3.97 | 0.0463 | 18 (0.894) | |
| d | − 7852.21 | − 7852.21 | 0 | 1 | – | |
| e | − 7852.13 | − 7852.10 | 0.06 | 0.8135 | – | |
| f | − 7852.21 | − 7851.96 | 0.50 | 0.4798 | – | |
| SWS1 | a | − 4194.06 | − 4194.06 | 0 | 1 | – |
| b | − 4194.59 | − 4193.82 | 1.54 | 0.2146 | – | |
| c | − 4189.36 | − 4185.92 | 6.87 | 0.0087 | 8 (0.895) 9 (0.860) 10 (0.788) 11 (0.765) 16 (0.704) 27 (0.895) 56 (0.678) 70 (0.888) 125 (0.746) 145 (0.751) 185 (0.881) 194 (0.766) 263 (0.792) 342 (0.512) | |
| LWS | a | − 4828.06 | − 4828.06 | 0 | 1 | – |
| b | − 4828.06 | − 4828.06 | 0 | 1 | – | |
| c | − 4828.06 | − 4828.06 | 0 | 1 | – | |
| d | − 4828.06 | − 4828.06 | 0 | 1 | – | |
lnL ln likelihood, LRT likelihood ratio test, – no positively selected sites
Comparison of representative spectral tuning sites among teleost RH2 opsins
| Tuning site | 97 | 122 | 207 | 292 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spotted halibut | ||||
| RH2B | S | E | M | A |
| RH2C | T | A | ||
| Barfin flounder | ||||
| RH2B | S | E | M | A |
| RH2C | T | A | ||
| Atlantic Halibut | ||||
| RH2 | S | E | M | A |
| Japanese flounder | ||||
| RH2A1 | S | Q | M | A |
| RH2A2 | T | Q | M | A |
| RH2B | S | E | M | A |
| RH2C | S | A | ||
| Turbot | ||||
| RH2A1 | S | Q | L | A |
| RH2A2 | T | Q | M | A |
| RH2B1 | S | E | M | A |
| RH2B2 | S | E | M | A |
| RH2C | S | A | ||
| Cichlids | ||||
| RH2Aα | S | E | M | A |
| RH2Aβ | S | E | M | A |
| RH2B | S | Q | M | A |
| Medaka | ||||
| RH2A | S | Q | M | S |
| RH2B | S | E | M | A |
| RH2C | S | Q | M | A |
| Guppy | ||||
| RH2-1 | S | E | M | A |
| RH2-2 | S | Q | L | A |
| Zebrafish | ||||
| RH2-1 | C | Q | M | A |
| RH2-2 | C | Q | M | A |
| RH2-3 | T | Q | M | A |
| RH2-4 | T | E | M | A |
Marked in Italics are two positively selected sites of RH2C
Comparison of representative spectral tuning sites among teleost RH1 opsins
| Tuning site | 83 | 122 | 261 | 292 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spotted halibut | N | E | F | A |
| Barfin flounder | N | E | F | A |
| Atlantic Halibut | N | E | F | A |
| Japanese flounder | N | E | F | A |
| Turbot | N | E | F | A |
| Medaka | D | E | F | A |
| Guppy | D | E | F | A |
| Cichlids | D | E | F | A |
| Zebrafish | D | E | F | A |
Fig. 3An inferred evolutionary pathway of turbot RH2 genes. The number on each node of the dendrogram (left) represents a duplication event, whereas the right side shows the changes in RH2 gene orientations during evolution
Fig. 4Visual opsin expression of turbot at different stages. Gene expression was measured by quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) with the TB Green Premix Ex Taq assay, and mRNA expression levels of each gene were averaged over several individuals: 0.5 month [15 days post hatching (dph), n > 30], 1 month (30 dph, n > 30), 2.5, 4, 9, and 18 months (n = 3). Different letters represent statistically significant differences between stages (P < 0.05)
Proportional expression of cone opsin genes of turbot at different stages
| Age (month) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 47.98a | 28.13a | 16.12a | 7.77a |
| 1 | 53.85a | 26.14a | 13.29a | 6.71ab |
| 2.5 | 47.43a | 34.13a | 14.51a | 3.93b |
| 4 | 24.71b | 53.39b | 17.35a | 4.55b |
| 9 | 14.64c | 63.27b | 18.74a | 3.35ab |
| 18 | 29.22b | 57.19b | 11.22b | 2.37b |
Different letters represent statistically significant differences between stages (P < 0.05)