David J Miller1, Leslie M Niziol2, Angela R Elam2, Michele Heisler3, Paul P Lee2, Kenneth Resnicow4, David C Musch5, Deborah Darnley-Fisch6, Jamie Mitchell7, Paula Anne Newman-Casey8. 1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Foundational Sciences, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, Michigan. 2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan. 7. School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 8. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: panewman@med.umich.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate whether demographic, clinical, or psychosocial factors act as moderators of change in medication adherence in the Support, Educate, Empower (SEE) program. DESIGN: Prospective, single-arm pilot study with a pre-post design. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with glaucoma aged ≥ 40 years and taking ≥ 1 glaucoma medication were recruited from the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center. Those who had electronically measured adherence ≤ 80% in the 3-month eligibility monitoring period were enrolled in the SEE program. METHODS: Medication adherence was monitored electronically during the 7-month intervention and calculated as the percentage of doses taken correctly. Change in adherence at different points in the SEE program and cumulative change in adherence were modeled with linear regression, and baseline demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors were investigated for significant associations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables associated with change in medication adherence in the SEE program. RESULTS: Thirty-nine participants completed the SEE program. These participants were on average 63.9 years old (standard deviation [SD], 10.7 years), 56% (n = 22) were male, 44% (n = 17) were White, and 49% (n = 19) were Black. Medication adherence improved from an average of 59.9% (SD, 18.5%) at baseline to 83.6% (SD, 17.5%) after the final SEE session, for an increase of 23.7% (SD, 17.5%). Although participants with lower income (< $25 000 and $25 000-50 000 vs. >$50 000) had lower baseline adherence (48.4% and 64.1% vs. 70.4%), these individuals had greater increases in adherence during the first month of medication reminders (19.6% and 21.6% vs. 10.2%; P = 0.05 and P = 0.007, respectively). Participants taking fewer glaucoma medications also had significantly greater increases in adherence with medication reminders (P < 0.001). Those with higher levels of glaucoma-related distress (GD) had lower baseline adherence and greater increases in adherence with glaucoma coaching (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-level factors associated with relatively greater improvements in medication adherence through the SEE Program included lower income, fewer glaucoma medications, and increased GD. These findings demonstrate that the SEE program can improve glaucoma self-management even among participants with social and psychological barriers to medication adherence.
PURPOSE: To investigate whether demographic, clinical, or psychosocial factors act as moderators of change in medication adherence in the Support, Educate, Empower (SEE) program. DESIGN: Prospective, single-arm pilot study with a pre-post design. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with glaucoma aged ≥ 40 years and taking ≥ 1 glaucoma medication were recruited from the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center. Those who had electronically measured adherence ≤ 80% in the 3-month eligibility monitoring period were enrolled in the SEE program. METHODS: Medication adherence was monitored electronically during the 7-month intervention and calculated as the percentage of doses taken correctly. Change in adherence at different points in the SEE program and cumulative change in adherence were modeled with linear regression, and baseline demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors were investigated for significant associations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables associated with change in medication adherence in the SEE program. RESULTS: Thirty-nine participants completed the SEE program. These participants were on average 63.9 years old (standard deviation [SD], 10.7 years), 56% (n = 22) were male, 44% (n = 17) were White, and 49% (n = 19) were Black. Medication adherence improved from an average of 59.9% (SD, 18.5%) at baseline to 83.6% (SD, 17.5%) after the final SEE session, for an increase of 23.7% (SD, 17.5%). Although participants with lower income (< $25 000 and $25 000-50 000 vs. >$50 000) had lower baseline adherence (48.4% and 64.1% vs. 70.4%), these individuals had greater increases in adherence during the first month of medication reminders (19.6% and 21.6% vs. 10.2%; P = 0.05 and P = 0.007, respectively). Participants taking fewer glaucoma medications also had significantly greater increases in adherence with medication reminders (P < 0.001). Those with higher levels of glaucoma-related distress (GD) had lower baseline adherence and greater increases in adherence with glaucoma coaching (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-level factors associated with relatively greater improvements in medication adherence through the SEE Program included lower income, fewer glaucoma medications, and increased GD. These findings demonstrate that the SEE program can improve glaucoma self-management even among participants with social and psychological barriers to medication adherence.
Authors: Laura E Dreer; Cynthia Owsley; Lisa Campbell; Liyan Gao; Andy Wood; Christopher A Girkin Journal: Curr Eye Res Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 2.424
Authors: Anjali U Pandit; Stacy C Bailey; Laura M Curtis; Hilary K Seligman; Terry C Davis; Ruth M Parker; Dean Schillinger; Darren DeWalt; David Fleming; David C Mohr; Michael S Wolf Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Constance O Okeke; Harry A Quigley; Henry D Jampel; Gui-shuang Ying; Ryan J Plyler; Yuzhen Jiang; David S Friedman Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-10-07 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Jennifer S Weizer; Michele Heisler; Paul P Lee; Joshua D Stein Journal: Semin Ophthalmol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 1.975
Authors: Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Leslie M Niziol; Paul P Lee; David C Musch; Kenneth Resnicow; Michele Heisler Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Date: 2020-04-30