Literature DB >> 34097526

Health And Economic Outcomes Up To Three Years After A Workplace Wellness Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Zirui Song1, Katherine Baicker2.   

Abstract

Workplace wellness programs aim to improve employee health and lower health care spending. Recent randomized studies have found modest short-run effects on health behaviors, but longer-run effects remain poorly understood. We analyzed a clustered randomized trial of a workplace wellness program implemented at a large multisite US employer. Twenty-five randomly selected treatment worksites received the program, with five of the worksites added at the trial's midpoint, and 135 randomly selected control worksites did not. The program included modules on nutrition, physical activity, and stress reduction, implemented by registered dietitians. The effects of program availability and participation were assessed. At the end of three years, employees at the treatment worksites had better self-reported health behaviors, including a higher rate of actively managing their weight. No significant differences were found in self-reported health; clinical markers of health; health care spending or use; or absenteeism, tenure, or job performance. Improvements in health behaviors after three years were similar to those at eighteen months, but the longer follow-up did not yield detectable improvements in clinical, economic, or employment outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34097526      PMCID: PMC8425177          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   9.048


  10 in total

Review 1.  A review and analysis of the clinical and cost-effectiveness studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease management programs at the worksite: update VIII 2008 to 2010.

Authors:  Kenneth R Pelletier
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  The effectiveness of a health promotion program after 3 years: evidence from the University of Minnesota.

Authors:  John A Nyman; Jean M Abraham; Molly Moore Jeffery; Nathan A Barleen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Wellness programs and lifestyle discrimination--the legal limits.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Workplace wellness programs can generate savings.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; David Cutler; Zirui Song
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  What do Workplace Wellness Programs do? Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study.

Authors:  Damon Jones; David Molitor; Julian Reif
Journal:  Q J Econ       Date:  2019-08-16

6.  On Two Approaches to Weighting in Causal Inference.

Authors:  David A Hirshberg; José R Zubizarreta
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Managing manifest diseases, but not health risks, saved PepsiCo money over seven years.

Authors:  John P Caloyeras; Hangsheng Liu; Ellen Exum; Megan Broderick; Soeren Mattke
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Effect of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health and Economic Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Zirui Song; Katherine Baicker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  The health and cost benefits of work site health-promotion programs.

Authors:  Ron Z Goetzel; Ronald J Ozminkowski
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 21.981

10.  Effects of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health, Health Beliefs, and Medical Use: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Julian Reif; David Chan; Damon Jones; Laura Payne; David Molitor
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.