Stella Talic1, Clara Marquina1, Richard Ofori-Asenso1, Marjana Petrova1, Danny Liew1, Alice J Owen1, Sean Lybrand2, David Thomson3, Jenni Ilomaki4, Ella Zomer1, Zanfina Ademi5. 1. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Australia. 2. Amgen Europe GmbH, Dammstrasse 23, 6300, Zug, Switzerland. 3. Amgen Australia Pty Ltd, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2113, Australia. 4. Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 5. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Australia. zanfina.ademi@monash.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Statins are widely prescribed for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but their effectiveness is dependent on the level of adherence and persistence. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the patterns of switching, adherence and persistence among the Australian general population with newly dispensed statins. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a random sample of data from the Australian national prescription claims data. Switching, adherence to and persistence with statins were assessed for people starting statins from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019. Switching was defined as either switching to another intensity of statin, to another statin or to a non-statin agent. Non-persistence to treatment was defined as discontinuation (i.e. ≥90 days with no statin) of coverage. Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC), and patients with PDC < 0.80 were considered non-adherent. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare discontinuation, switching and reinitiation between different statins. RESULTS: A cohort of 141,062 people dispensed statins and followed over a median duration of 2.5 years were included. Of the cohort, 29.3% switched statin intensity, 28.4% switched statin type, 3.7% switched to ezetimibe and in 2.7%, ezetimibe was added as combination therapy during the study period. Overall, 58.8% discontinued statins based on the 90-day gap criteria, of whom 55.2% restarted. The proportion of people non-adherent was 24.0% at 6 months to 49.0% at 5 years. People on low and moderate intensity statins were more likely to discontinue compared to those on high-intensity statins (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.31), (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.14-1.42), respectively. Compared to maintaining same statin type and intensity, switching statins, which includes up-titration (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.86) was associated with less likelihood of discontinuation after reinitiation. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term persistence and adherence to statins remains generally poor among Australians, which limits the effectiveness of these medicines and the consequent health impact they may provide for individuals (and by extension, the population impact when poor persistence and adherence is considered in the statin-taking population). Switching between statins is prevalent in one third of statin users, although any clinical benefit of the observed switching trend is unknown. This, combined with the high volume of statin prescriptions, highlights the need for better strategies to address poor persistence and adherence.
BACKGROUND: Statins are widely prescribed for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but their effectiveness is dependent on the level of adherence and persistence. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the patterns of switching, adherence and persistence among the Australian general population with newly dispensed statins. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a random sample of data from the Australian national prescription claims data. Switching, adherence to and persistence with statins were assessed for people starting statins from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019. Switching was defined as either switching to another intensity of statin, to another statin or to a non-statin agent. Non-persistence to treatment was defined as discontinuation (i.e. ≥90 days with no statin) of coverage. Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC), and patients with PDC < 0.80 were considered non-adherent. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare discontinuation, switching and reinitiation between different statins. RESULTS: A cohort of 141,062 people dispensed statins and followed over a median duration of 2.5 years were included. Of the cohort, 29.3% switched statin intensity, 28.4% switched statin type, 3.7% switched to ezetimibe and in 2.7%, ezetimibe was added as combination therapy during the study period. Overall, 58.8% discontinued statins based on the 90-day gap criteria, of whom 55.2% restarted. The proportion of people non-adherent was 24.0% at 6 months to 49.0% at 5 years. People on low and moderate intensity statins were more likely to discontinue compared to those on high-intensity statins (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.31), (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.14-1.42), respectively. Compared to maintaining same statin type and intensity, switching statins, which includes up-titration (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.86) was associated with less likelihood of discontinuation after reinitiation. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term persistence and adherence to statins remains generally poor among Australians, which limits the effectiveness of these medicines and the consequent health impact they may provide for individuals (and by extension, the population impact when poor persistence and adherence is considered in the statin-taking population). Switching between statins is prevalent in one third of statin users, although any clinical benefit of the observed switching trend is unknown. This, combined with the high volume of statin prescriptions, highlights the need for better strategies to address poor persistence and adherence.
Authors: Shuaib M Abdullah; Laura F Defina; David Leonard; Carolyn E Barlow; Nina B Radford; Benjamin L Willis; Anand Rohatgi; Darren K McGuire; James A de Lemos; Scott M Grundy; Jarett D Berry; Amit Khera Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Richard Ofori-Asenso; Jenni Ilomäki; Mark Tacey; Ella Zomer; Andrea J Curtis; J Simon Bell; Sophia Zoungas; Danny Liew Journal: J Diabetes Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 4.006
Authors: Connie B Newman; David Preiss; Jonathan A Tobert; Terry A Jacobson; Robert L Page; Larry B Goldstein; Clifford Chin; Lisa R Tannock; Michael Miller; Geetha Raghuveer; P Barton Duell; Eliot A Brinton; Amy Pollak; Lynne T Braun; Francine K Welty Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Karen Ho; Kris M Jamsen; J Simon Bell; Maarit Jaana Korhonen; Kevin P Mc Namara; Dianna J Magliano; Danny Liew; Taliesin E Ryan-Atwood; Jonathan E Shaw; Susan Luc; Jenni Ilomäki Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Robert S Rosenson; Steven Baker; Maciej Banach; Kenneth M Borow; Lynne T Braun; Eric Bruckert; Liam R Brunham; Alberico L Catapano; Marshall B Elam; G B John Mancini; Patrick M Moriarty; Pamela B Morris; Paul Muntner; Kausik K Ray; Erik S Stroes; Beth A Taylor; Valerie H Taylor; Gerald F Watts; Paul D Thompson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Richard Ofori-Asenso; Jenni Ilomaki; Mark Tacey; Ella Zomer; Andrea J Curtis; Si Si; Andrew R Zullo; Maarit Jaana Korhonen; J Simon Bell; Sophia Zoungas; Danny Liew Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gregory A Roth; George A Mensah; Catherine O Johnson; Giovanni Addolorato; Enrico Ammirati; Larry M Baddour; Noël C Barengo; Andrea Z Beaton; Emelia J Benjamin; Catherine P Benziger; Aimé Bonny; Michael Brauer; Marianne Brodmann; Thomas J Cahill; Jonathan Carapetis; Alberico L Catapano; Sumeet S Chugh; Leslie T Cooper; Josef Coresh; Michael Criqui; Nicole DeCleene; Kim A Eagle; Sophia Emmons-Bell; Valery L Feigin; Joaquim Fernández-Solà; Gerry Fowkes; Emmanuela Gakidou; Scott M Grundy; Feng J He; George Howard; Frank Hu; Lesley Inker; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nicholas Kassebaum; Walter Koroshetz; Carl Lavie; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Hong S Lu; Antonio Mirijello; Awoke Misganaw Temesgen; Ali Mokdad; Andrew E Moran; Paul Muntner; Jagat Narula; Bruce Neal; Mpiko Ntsekhe; Glaucia Moraes de Oliveira; Catherine Otto; Mayowa Owolabi; Michael Pratt; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Marissa Reitsma; Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro; Nancy Rigotti; Anthony Rodgers; Craig Sable; Saate Shakil; Karen Sliwa-Hahnle; Benjamin Stark; Johan Sundström; Patrick Timpel; Imad M Tleyjeh; Marco Valgimigli; Theo Vos; Paul K Whelton; Magdi Yacoub; Liesl Zuhlke; Christopher Murray; Valentin Fuster Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Su Golder; Davy Weissenbacher; Karen O'Connor; Sean Hennessy; Robert Gross; Graciela Gonzalez Hernandez Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2022-08-07 Impact factor: 5.228