Md Quamar Azam1, Tarun Goyal2, Souvik Paul3, Arvind Kumar Yadav3, Nishith Govil4. 1. Department of Trauma Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, 151001, India. goyal.tarun@gmail.com. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: With an increasing number of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), protocols for better standard of patient care and shorter duration of hospital stay are necessary. Enhanced recovery (ER) protocols are becoming popular to meet these objectives. The current study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome of fast-track TKA using ER protocol in terms of length of hospital stay, perioperative complications and functional outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing single-stage bilateral primary TKA were prospectively included in the study. All patients went through a pre-defined ER protocol of TKA. Length of hospital stay, readmission rates, pain scores and functional scores of patients operated under ER protocol were compared with another matched historical control-group. Factors delaying the discharge of the patients by 48 h after the surgery were noted. RESULTS: We compared 275 patients undergoing single-stage bilateral primary TKA through ER protocol (Group 1) with 190 patients who had undergone bilateral primary TKA before the ER protocol was initiated (Group 2). The length of hospital stay (3.9 ± 2.1 days in group 1 and 7.5 ± 3.2 days in group 2, p 0.0001) and post-operative pain scores at 12 h (5.2 ± 2.9 in group 1 and 5.7 ± 2.1 in group 2, p 0.03) and 24 h (4.1 ± 1.6 in group 1 and 4.6 ± 1.4 in group 2, p 0.0005) were found to be significantly better with ER protocol. There was no difference in Oxford knee scores, infection rates, readmissions or mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION: ER protocol in single-stage bilateral primary TKA resulted in decreased length of hospital stay without increasing complications and compromising the clinical outcome. It requires an integrated approach and adherence to clinical pathways. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prospective comparative study.
PURPOSE: With an increasing number of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), protocols for better standard of patient care and shorter duration of hospital stay are necessary. Enhanced recovery (ER) protocols are becoming popular to meet these objectives. The current study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome of fast-track TKA using ER protocol in terms of length of hospital stay, perioperative complications and functional outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing single-stage bilateral primary TKA were prospectively included in the study. All patients went through a pre-defined ER protocol of TKA. Length of hospital stay, readmission rates, pain scores and functional scores of patients operated under ER protocol were compared with another matched historical control-group. Factors delaying the discharge of the patients by 48 h after the surgery were noted. RESULTS: We compared 275 patients undergoing single-stage bilateral primary TKA through ER protocol (Group 1) with 190 patients who had undergone bilateral primary TKA before the ER protocol was initiated (Group 2). The length of hospital stay (3.9 ± 2.1 days in group 1 and 7.5 ± 3.2 days in group 2, p 0.0001) and post-operative pain scores at 12 h (5.2 ± 2.9 in group 1 and 5.7 ± 2.1 in group 2, p 0.03) and 24 h (4.1 ± 1.6 in group 1 and 4.6 ± 1.4 in group 2, p 0.0005) were found to be significantly better with ER protocol. There was no difference in Oxford knee scores, infection rates, readmissions or mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION: ER protocol in single-stage bilateral primary TKA resulted in decreased length of hospital stay without increasing complications and compromising the clinical outcome. It requires an integrated approach and adherence to clinical pathways. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prospective comparative study.
Authors: Nicholas B Scott; David McDonald; Jane Campbell; Richard D Smith; A Kate Carey; Ian G Johnston; Kate R James; Steffen J Breusch Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Ajay Malviya; Kate Martin; Ian Harper; Scott D Muller; Kevin P Emmerson; Paul F Partington; Mike R Reed Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 3.717
Authors: Kristian Larsen; Karen Elisabeth Hvass; Torben B Hansen; Per B Thomsen; Kjeld Søballe Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2008-04-28 Impact factor: 2.362