David T Levy1, Christopher J Cadham1, Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero1, Marie Knoll1, Nargiz Travis1, Zhe Yuan1, Yameng Li1, Ritesh Mistry2, Clifford E Douglas3, Jamie Tam4, Aylin Sertkaya5, Kenneth E Warner3, Rafael Meza6. 1. Department of Oncology, Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA. 2. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. School of Public Health, Yale University, Hartford, CT, USA. 5. ERG, Lexington, MA, USA. 6. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The US Food and Drug Administration announced its intention to ban menthol in cigarettes. However, information is needed on how a federal ban would affect population health. AIMS AND METHODS: We conducted an expert elicitation to gauge the impact of a menthol cigarette and cigar ban in the United States. We developed and pilot tested a questionnaire that focused on tobacco use transitions of current smokers (age 18-24 menthol, age 35-54 menthol, and age 35-54 nonmenthol) and potential menthol smokers (age 12-24). Using a structured expert elicitation, we estimated mean net transitions under a ban from cigarette use to combustible tobacco product, smokeless tobacco, novel nicotine delivery product (NNDPs, such as e-cigarettes) use, or no tobacco use. RESULTS: Eleven experts provided responses. Of those ages 12-24 who would have initiated menthol cigarette use in the absence of a ban, the experts estimated that 41% would still initiate combustible products under a ban, while 18% would initiate with NNDPs and 39% would not initiate regular tobacco use. Combustible use by menthol smokers ages 35-54 was expected to decline by 20% postban relative to preban rates, half switching to NNDPs and half quitting all tobacco use. Menthol smokers ages 18-24 were expected to reduce combustible use by 30%, with 16% switching to NNDPs. Greater reductions in combustible use were estimated for African Americans across the three age groups. Negligible impacts were expected for current adult nonmenthol smokers. CONCLUSIONS: According to expert opinion, a menthol ban is expected to substantially reduce smoking initiation and combustible tobacco product use among current menthol smokers. IMPLICATIONS: The US Food and Drug Administration recently announced its intention to ban menthol in cigarettes, but information on the potential impact on smoking and other nicotine product use is limited. We conducted an expert elicitation to gauge the impact of a menthol cigarette and cigar ban in the United States. A panel of experts estimated that menthol smokers ages 35-54 would reduce combustible tobacco use by 20%, with half switching to e-cigarettes and half quitting all nicotine use. Larger reductions were expected at younger ages, and menthol smoking initiation was reduced by 59% with 18% instead using e-cigarettes. African Americans were expected to have greater reductions in combustible tobacco use than the rest of the population.
INTRODUCTION: The US Food and Drug Administration announced its intention to ban menthol in cigarettes. However, information is needed on how a federal ban would affect population health. AIMS AND METHODS: We conducted an expert elicitation to gauge the impact of a menthol cigarette and cigar ban in the United States. We developed and pilot tested a questionnaire that focused on tobacco use transitions of current smokers (age 18-24 menthol, age 35-54 menthol, and age 35-54 nonmenthol) and potential menthol smokers (age 12-24). Using a structured expert elicitation, we estimated mean net transitions under a ban from cigarette use to combustible tobacco product, smokeless tobacco, novel nicotine delivery product (NNDPs, such as e-cigarettes) use, or no tobacco use. RESULTS: Eleven experts provided responses. Of those ages 12-24 who would have initiated menthol cigarette use in the absence of a ban, the experts estimated that 41% would still initiate combustible products under a ban, while 18% would initiate with NNDPs and 39% would not initiate regular tobacco use. Combustible use by menthol smokers ages 35-54 was expected to decline by 20% postban relative to preban rates, half switching to NNDPs and half quitting all tobacco use. Menthol smokers ages 18-24 were expected to reduce combustible use by 30%, with 16% switching to NNDPs. Greater reductions in combustible use were estimated for African Americans across the three age groups. Negligible impacts were expected for current adult nonmenthol smokers. CONCLUSIONS: According to expert opinion, a menthol ban is expected to substantially reduce smoking initiation and combustible tobacco product use among current menthol smokers. IMPLICATIONS: The US Food and Drug Administration recently announced its intention to ban menthol in cigarettes, but information on the potential impact on smoking and other nicotine product use is limited. We conducted an expert elicitation to gauge the impact of a menthol cigarette and cigar ban in the United States. A panel of experts estimated that menthol smokers ages 35-54 would reduce combustible tobacco use by 20%, with half switching to e-cigarettes and half quitting all nicotine use. Larger reductions were expected at younger ages, and menthol smoking initiation was reduced by 59% with 18% instead using e-cigarettes. African Americans were expected to have greater reductions in combustible tobacco use than the rest of the population.
Authors: Linda A Alexander; Dennis R Trinidad; Kari-Lyn K Sakuma; Pallav Pokhrel; Thaddeus A Herzog; Mark S Clanton; Eric T Moolchan; Pebbles Fagan Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Lauren K Collins; Raymond S Niaura; Stacey Y Gagosian; David B Abrams Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Michael Chaiton; Robert Schwartz; Jennifer Shuldiner; Gabrielle Tremblay; Robert Nugent Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Andrea S Gentzke; Teresa W Wang; Ahmed Jamal; Eunice Park-Lee; Chunfeng Ren; Karen A Cullen; Linda Neff Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: David T Levy; Rafael Meza; Zhe Yuan; Yameng Li; Christopher Cadham; Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero; Nargiz Travis; Marie Knoll; Alex C Liber; Ritesh Mistry; Jana L Hirschtick; Nancy L Fleischer; Sarah Skolnick; Andrew F Brouwer; Cliff Douglas; Jihyoun Jeon; Steven Cook; Kenneth E Warner Journal: Tob Control Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 6.953
Authors: Yan Li; Julia Sisti; Karen R Flórez; Sandra S Albrecht; Anita Viswanath; Marivel Davila; Jennifer Cantrell; Diksha Brahmbhatt; Azure B Thompson; John Jasek; Earle C Chambers Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2021-11-09 Impact factor: 3.671