| Literature DB >> 34095832 |
Kristina Safar1,2, Jing Zhang1,2, Zahra Emami1,2, Avideh Gharehgazlou1,2,3, George Ibrahim1,2,4,5, Benjamin T Dunkley1,2,6.
Abstract
Mild traumatic brain injury is highly prevalent in paediatric populations, and can result in chronic physical, cognitive and emotional impairment, known as persistent post-concussive symptoms. Magnetoencephalography has been used to investigate neurophysiological dysregulation in mild traumatic brain injury in adults; however, whether neural dysrhythmia persists in chronic mild traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents is largely unknown. We predicted that children and adolescents would show similar dysfunction as adults, including pathological slow-wave oscillations and maladaptive, frequency-specific, alterations to neural connectivity. Using magnetoencephalography, we investigated regional oscillatory power and distributed brain-wide networks in a cross-sectional sample of children and adolescents in the chronic stages of mild traumatic brain injury. Additionally, we used a machine learning pipeline to identify the most relevant magnetoencephalography features for classifying mild traumatic brain injury and to test the relative classification performance of regional power versus functional coupling. Results revealed that the majority of participants with chronic mild traumatic brain injury reported persistent post-concussive symptoms. For neurophysiological imaging, we found increased regional power in the delta band in chronic mild traumatic brain injury, predominantly in bilateral occipital cortices and in the right inferior temporal gyrus. Those with chronic mild traumatic brain injury also showed dysregulated neuronal coupling, including decreased connectivity in the delta range, as well as hyper-connectivity in the theta, low gamma and high gamma bands, primarily involving frontal, temporal and occipital brain areas. Furthermore, our multivariate classification approach combined with functional connectivity data outperformed regional power in terms of between-group classification accuracy. For the first time, we establish that local and large-scale neural activity are altered in youth in the chronic phase of mild traumatic brain injury, with the majority presenting persistent post-concussive symptoms, and that dysregulated interregional neural communication is a reliable marker of lingering paediatric 'mild' traumatic brain injury.Entities:
Keywords: children; functional connectivity; machine learning classification; magnetoencephalography; mild traumatic brain injury
Year: 2021 PMID: 34095832 PMCID: PMC8176148 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Commun ISSN: 2632-1297
Demographic characteristics
| mTBI ( | Control ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age in years (SD), range | 12.46(3.24), 6.17–17.92 | 13.14(2.69), 6.31–15.74 | 0.369 |
| Sex ( | 11 | 10 | 0.257 |
| Right-handedness (%) | 81.3 | 87.5 | |
| Mean time since injury to scan in days (SD), range | 455.56(421.9), 79–1557 | – |
Comparisons by Mann–Whitney U-test for age and chi-square test for sex.
Proportion of participants with PPCS
| PPCS | Proportion of participants |
|---|---|
| Headache | 0.53 |
| Fatigue | 0.53 |
| Irritable | 0.5 |
| Difficulty concentrating | 0.5 |
| Feeling mentally ‘foggy’ | 0.47 |
| Dizziness | 0.44 |
| Drowsiness | 0.4 |
| Sensitivity to light | 0.4 |
| Sensitivity to noise | 0.36 |
| Nausea | 0.34 |
| Answer questions more slowly than usual | 0.29 |
| Difficulty remembering | 0.27 |
| Nervousness | 0.27 |
| Vision problems (double vision, blurring) | 0.27 |
| Sadness | 0.2 |
| Balance problems | 0.2 |
| Feeling slowed down | 0.13 |
Missing data from one participant are not included.
Missing data from two participants are not included.
Final model performance
| Frequency | Cross-validation accuracy (%, mean±SD) | Training data accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Regional power | ||
| Delta | 78.3 ± 16.8 | 86.11 |
| Functional connectivity | ||
| Delta | 97.5 ± 7.91 | 100 |
| Theta | 97.5 ± 7.91 | 100 |
| Low gamma1 | 94.2 ± 12.5 | 94.4 |
| Low gamma2 | 90.8 ± 13.9 | 94.4 |
| High gamma | 93.3 ± 14.1 | 100 |
Both cross-validation and training data accuracy are shown. The table shows low degree (functional connectivity: Delta, Theta and High gamma) of or no overfitting (Regional power, Function connectivity: Low gammas), and that functional connectivity models outperformed the delta power model.
Figure 1Power spectral density plotted by hemisphere and by lobe. The PSD is displayed for mTBI and the control group, divided by hemisphere and by lobe, for 3–30 Hz (A). Peak alpha power was significantly reduced in the left and right occipital lobes in the mTBI group (both P < 0.01, FDR-corrected) (B)—however, ‘broadband’ alpha was not significantly different.
Figure 2Children and adolescents with chronic mTBI show pathological increases in delta power. Increased power in the delta band was found in bilateral occipito-parietal areas and the right inferior temporal and somatosensory gyrus. Regional power in the mTBI (A) and the control groups (B) is displayed. The F-statistic map for group contrasts (C) reveal increased power in the mTBI compared to controls as confirmed by a post hoc Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test; binarized FDR-corrected maps showing significant regions (pcorr < 0.05) is plotted in red (D).
Figure 3Dysregulated functional coupling is frequency-specific in mTBI. Significant between-group differences in functional coupling were determined by a one-way ANCOVA computed for individual AEC values, depicted as elements in the 90-by-90 connectivity matrix; permutation testing was used to estimate the P-value (10 000 permutations), with a FDR-correction for multiple comparisons applied across the whole connectome space (e.g. 4005 unique connections) at P < 0.05. Amplitude envelope correlation matrices are displayed for the chronic mTBI (left column) and control groups (second column). The glass brains (third column) show the significant differences. The width of the edges is scaled by the F-statistic, and the node size is scaled by degree. AEC is decreased in chronic mTBI vs. controls in the delta band (A), and increased in mTBI in theta and gamma bands (B).
Figure 4Selected features for ML classification performance. The most reliable selected features for ML classification performance are shown for regional power (A) and functional connectivity (B). Feature selection counts are scaled by colour and by edge width for functional connectivity and region colour for regional power.
List of most reliable features for machine learning classification performance
| (a) Selected regions | Delta | Calcarine_L, Cingulum_Mid_L, Frontal_Inf_Orb_L, Lingual_L, Occipital_Inf_L, Occipital_Mid_L, Occipital_Sup_L, Paracentral_Lobule_L, Parietal_Inf_L, Postcentral_L, Calcarine_R, Frontal_Mid_Orb_R, Fusiform_R, Hippocampus_R, Lingual_R, Occipital_Inf_R, Occipital_Mid_R, Occipital_Sup_R, Parietal_Sup_R, Postcentral_R, Temporal_Inf_R |
| (b) Selected connections (node pairs) | Delta |
Amygdala_L: Cuneus_L Caudate_L: Putamen_R Cuneus_L: Precuneus_L Frontal_Med_Orb_R: Heschl_R Frontal_Med_Orb_R: Cuneus_L Frontal_Mid_L: Cuneus_L Frontal_Mid_Orb_R: Parietal_Inf_R Frontal_Sup_Orb_L: Frontal_Inf_Orb_R Hippocampus_R: Cuneus_R Precentral_R: Rectus_R Rectus_R: Cuneus_R |
| Theta |
Cingulum_Mid_L: Cingulum_Post_R Cuneus_L: Putamen_L Frontal_Inf_Oper_R: Caudate_L Frontal_Inf_Orb_R: Angular_R Heschl_R: Temporal_Pole_Sup_R Precentral_R: Temporal_Pole_Sup_R | |
| Logamma1 |
Amygdala_L: Fusiform_L Calcarine_L: Occipital_Inf_R Frontal_Sup_L: Amygdala_R Occipital_Inf_L: Pallidum_L Olfactory_L: Cingulum_Ant_R Postcentral_R: Paracentral_Lobule_R | |
| Logamma2 |
Calcarine_L: Calcarine_R Calcarine_L: Occipital_Inf_L Calcarine_R: Occipital_Inf_L Calcarine_R: Occipital_Inf_R Frontal_Inf_Oper_L: Cuneus_L Fusiform_L: Parietal_Sup_R Hippocampus_R: Occipital_Mid_L Lingual_L: Occipital_Inf_R Occipital_Inf_R: Thalamus_R | |
| High gamma |
Calcarine_L: Lingual_L Calcarine_L: Occipital_Inf_R Calcarine_L: Fusiform_R Calcarine_R: Occipital_Inf_L Calcarine_R: Occipital_Inf_R Cingulum_Ant_R: Cingulum_Post_R Rectus_L: Temporal_Mid_L |
Figure 5Classification analysis shows functional connectivity outperforms regional power in classification modelling at the delta frequency. The PCA results show that the functional connectivity data successfully separated the two participant groups with ML selected features, while the delta power data failed to achieve so. The permutation tests for both SVM and PLS-DA modelling showed that the delta functional connectivity models are more significant (smaller P-values) than the regional power models. When tested on the entire subject set (training data), the delta power model failed to achieve the expected optimal performance in AUC, whereas the functional connectivity counterpart achieved such.