| Literature DB >> 34095631 |
Philip Sarajlic1, Oscar Plunde1, Anders Franco-Cereceda2,3, Magnus Bäck1,3.
Abstract
Male and female aortic stenosis patients have distinct valvular phenotypes, increasing the complexities in the evaluation of valvular pathophysiology. In this study, we present cutting-edge artificial intelligence analyses of transcriptome-wide array data from stenotic aortic valves to highlight differences in gene expression patterns between the sexes, using both sex-differentiated transcripts and unbiased gene selections. This approach enabled the development of efficient models with high predictive ability and determining the most significant sex-dependent contributors to calcification. In addition, analyses of function-related gene groups revealed enriched fibrotic pathways among female patients. Ultimately, we demonstrate that artificial intelligence models can be used to accurately predict aortic valve calcification by carefully analyzing sex-specific gene transcripts.Entities:
Keywords: AI, artificial intelligence; AS, aortic stenosis; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; ML, machine learning; PCA, principal component analysis; aortic stenosis; artificial intelligence; calcification; sex differences
Year: 2021 PMID: 34095631 PMCID: PMC8165113 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.02.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JACC Basic Transl Sci ISSN: 2452-302X
Clinical Characteristics of the Study Cohort Stratified by Sex
| Male (N = 18) | Female (N = 18) | Standardized Difference | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Median (Q1, Q3) | Mean ± SD | Median (Q1, Q3) | ||||
| Characteristics | |||||||
| Age, yrs | 75.3 ± 5.7 | 76 (72.9, 79.8) | 74.4 ± 5.2 | 75.5 (72, 78.5) | 0.16 | ||
| BMI, kg/m2 | 29.1 ± 5.3 | 27.9 (25.6, 32.1) | 29.4 ± 4.94 | 27.6 (26.0, 32.0) | 0.08 | ||
| MAP, mm Hg | 97.8 ± 10.3 | 100.8 (90, 103.3) | 94.5 ± 10 | 94 (86.6, 103.3) | 0.33 | ||
| HR, beats/min | 71 ± 10 | 70 (62, 78) | 75 ± 9 | 74 (70, 80) | 0.36 | ||
| CRP, mg/l | 5 ± 6 | 2 (1, 6) | 3 ± 3 | 1 (1, 3) | 0.43 | ||
| WBC, 109/l | 7.1 ± 1.9 | 7.2 (5.8, 7.9) | 6.6 ± 1.9 | 6.5 (5, 7.4) | 0.26 | ||
| Hb, g/l | 134 ± 11 | 133.5 (130, 143) | 136 ± 15 | 139 (122, 150) | 0.16 | ||
| HbA1c, mmol/mol | 42 ± 10 | 39 (34, 44) | 38 ± 9 | 36 (35, 41) | 0.34 | ||
| eGFR, ml/min per1.73 m2 | 67 ± 22 | 73.5 (53, 83) | 66 ± 15 | 61.5 (55, 82) | 0.06 | ||
| Categorical parameters | |||||||
| Smoking | |||||||
| Never | 7 (39) | 8 (47) | 0.42 | ||||
| Former | 11 (61) | 8 (47) | |||||
| Current | 0 (0) | 1 (5.9) | |||||
| CABG | 9 (50) | 5 (28) | 0.47 | ||||
| CVD | 15 (83) | 16 (89) | 0.16 | ||||
| CAD | 10 (56) | 6 (33) | 0.46 | ||||
| Diabetes | 4 (22) | 2 (11) | 0.30 | ||||
| Statins | 10 (56) | 6 (33) | 0.46 | ||||
Values are mean ± SD, median (Q1, Q3), or n (%).
BMI = body mass index; CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; CAD = coronary artery disease; CRP = C-reactive protein; CVD = cardiovascular disease; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; Hb = hemoglobin; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1C; HR = heart rate; MAP = mean arterial pressure; WBC = white blood cells.
N = 17.
Figure 1A 2 × 2 Plot
A 2 × 2 plot indicating genes located at the 25% extremes of the tissue-type and sex axes. Dot-color opacity is correlated with the amount of genes located at a certain position in the chart.
Figure 2Principal Component Analysis
Principal component analysis with filtering by variance and guided by projection score. (A) Colored according to sex (pink for women, blue for men). (B) Colored according to tissue type (yellow for nondiseased, pink for intermediate, and blue for calcified).
Figure 3Genetic Predictor Importance Plots
Polar plots showing predictor importance (weight) in the (A) random forest and (B) gradient boosted tree machine learning models using 149 differentially expressed genes between the sexes. A weight is given by the sum of improvements the selection of a given variable provided at a node.
Figure 4Sex Chromosome Gene Importance Plots
Polar plots showing predictor importance (weight) in the random forest and gradient boosted tree machine learning models using all genes located on the sex chromosomes. A weight is given by the sum of improvements the selection of a given variable provided at a node.