| Literature DB >> 34095624 |
Jin Leng1, Ye He1,2, Zhang Yuan1, Bailong Tao1, Ke Li1, Chuanchuan Lin1, Kun Xu1, Maowen Chen1, Liangliang Dai3, Xuemin Li4, Tony Jun Huang2, Kaiyong Cai1,5.
Abstract
Ideal percutaneous titanium implants request both antibacterial ability and soft tissue compatibility. ZnO structure constructed on titanium has been widely proved to be helpful to combat pathogen contamination, but the biosafety of ZnO is always questioned. How to maintain the remarkable antibacterial ability of ZnO and efficiently reduce the corresponding toxicity is still challenging. Herein, a hybrid hydrogel coating was constructed on the fabricated ZnO structure of titanium, and the coating was proved to be enzymatically-degradable when bacteria exist. Then the antibacterial activity of ZnO was presented. When under the normal condition (no bacteria), the hydrogel coating was stable and tightly adhered to titanium. The toxicity of ZnO was reduced, and the viability of fibroblasts was largely improved. More importantly, the hydrogel coating provided a good buffer zone for cell ingrowth and soft tissue integration. The curbed Zn ion release was also proved to be useful to regulate fibroblast responses such as the expression of CTGF and COL-I. These results were also validated by in vivo studies. Therefore, this study proposed a valid self-adaptive strategy for ZnO improvement. Under different conditions, the sample could present different functions, and both the antibacterial ability and soft tissue compatibility were finely preserved.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-bacteria; Fibroblasts; Hydrogel coatings; Soft tissue compatibility; Titanium; ZnO
Year: 2021 PMID: 34095624 PMCID: PMC8164017 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Scheme 1Schematic diagram of the self-adaptive strategy of this study.
Fig. 1(A) Schematic illustration of hydrogel synthesis, ZnO fabrication, and sample preparation. (B) Representative SEM images and EDS analysis of Ti and Ti-ZnO groups. (C) XRD test of Ti and Ti-ZnO groups. (D) and (E) NMR analysis of different hydrogel precursors.
Fig. 2(A) Representative SEM images of different groups after incubation with PBS and HAase solution for 144 h. (B) Degradation test of different groups when incubating with S. aureus. (C)–(F) Degradation test of different groups when incubating with PBS and different concentrations of HAase solution. (G) and (H) Zn ion release detection of different groups when incubating with PBS and HAase solution.
Fig. 3(A) Representative plates of E. coli and S. aureus colonies after incubating with different groups for 6 and 24 h. (B) and (C) The corresponding quantitative statistics of the survival rates of E. coli and S. aureus. (D) Representative fluorescence images of E. coli and S. aureus colonies after incubating with different groups for 24 h. The bacteria were stained by Hoechst 33258 (blue). (E) and (F) The viability of suspensive and adhesive E. coli and S. aureus after incubating with different groups for 7 days. (G) The live/dead staining of S. aureus after incubating with different groups for 7 days (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Fig. 4(A) Representative SEM images of S. aureus after incubating with different groups for 7 days. Yellow circle represented the dead bacteria. (B) OD260 value of S. aureus after incubating with different groups for 6 h, 24 h and 7 days. (C) Protein leakage test of S. aureus after incubating with different groups for 7 days. (D) The antibacterial mechanism illustration (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Fig. 5(A) Cell viability test of NIH/3T3 after incubating with different groups for 1, 4 and 7 days. (B) CTGF expression of NIH/3T3 after incubating with different groups for 1, 4 and 7 days. (C) COL-I expression of NIH/3T3 after incubating with different groups for 1, 4 and 7 days. (D) Representative fluorescence images of COL-I expression after incubating with different groups for 7 days. (E) The corresponding quantitative statistics of COL-I expression. (F) 3D cell morphology observation after incubating with different groups for 7 days (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Fig. 6(A) Schematic diagram of in vivo studies. (B) Giemsa and H&E staining of different groups after 2 and 7 days. Yellow arrows represented bacteria and green arrows represented the infiltrated neutrophils. (C) Representative plates of S. aureus colonies of different groups after 2 and 7 days. (D) Corresponding quantitative statistics of bacteria counts after 2 and 7 days (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Fig. 7(A) Representative fluorescence images of Ki-67 and TUNEL staining after 7 and 14 days. (B) Representative images of Masson's trichrome staining after 14 days.