| Literature DB >> 34094833 |
Zhiyao Xu1,2, Zhuha Zhou3, Jing Zhang1, Feichao Xuan4, Mengjing Fan1,2, Difan Zhou4, Zhenyu Liuyang4, Ximei Ma4, Yiyang Hong1, Yihong Wang2, Sherven Sharma5, Qinghua Dong1,6, Guanyu Wang4.
Abstract
Liver is the most common metastatic site for colorectal cancer (CRC), there is no satisfied approach to treat CRC liver metastasis (CRCLM). Here, we investigated the role of a polycomb protein BMI-1 in CRCLM. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that BMI-1 expression in liver metastases was upregulated and associated with T4 stage, invasion depth and right-sided primary tumor. Knockdown BMI-1 in high metastatic HCT116 and LOVO cells repressed the migratory/invasive phenotype and reversed epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), while BMI-1 overexpression in low metastatic Ls174T and DLD1 cells enhanced invasiveness and EMT. The effects of BMI-1 in CRC cells were related to upregulating snail via AKT/GSK-3β pathway. Furthermore, knockdown BMI-1 in HCT116 and LOVO cells reduced CRCLM using experimental liver metastasis mice model. Meanwhile, BMI-1 overexpression in Ls174T and DLD1 significantly increased CRCLM. Moreover, sodium butyrate, a histone deacetylase and BMI-1 inhibitor, reduced HCT116 and LOVO liver metastasis in immunodeficient mice. Our results suggest that BMI-1 is a major regulator of CRCLM and provide a potent molecular target for CRCLM treatment.Entities:
Keywords: AKT; ANOVA, One-way analysis of variance; BMI-1; CRC, colorectal cancer; CRCLM, colorectal cancer liver metastasis; Colorectal cancer; EMT, epithelial–mesenchymal transition; Epithelial–mesenchymal transition; GSK-3β; HDACi, histone deacetylase inhibitor; HE, hematoxylin and eosin; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LNM, lymph node metastasis; Liver metastasis; NaB, sodium butyrate; PBS, phosphate buffered solution; PcG, polycomb-group; Snail; Sodium butyrate; TCGA, Cancer Genome Atlas; qPCR, real time polymerase chain reaction
Year: 2020 PMID: 34094833 PMCID: PMC8148062 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.11.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Figure 1Expression of BMI-1 in human CRC primary and metastatic tumors. (A) Immunohistochemical staining of BMI-1 in paired tissue samples from four CRC patients (P1–P4). (B) Immunoreactivity scores in primary CRC (CRC), liver metastases (LM), lymph node metastases (LNM). (C) Real-time PCR quantification of BMI-1 mRNA expression levels in human CRC primary and liver metastatic tumors. BMI-1 and EZH2 expression levels are presented as the fold changes relative to that in primary tumor and normalized to GAPDH. BMI-1 is upregulated in CRC liver metastases.
Correlation between CRC patient clinicopathological characteristics and BMI-1 expression in liver metastases.
| Characteristic | BMI-1 expression in liver metastases | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall ( | Low ( | Middle ( | High ( | ||
| Age | 59 (54, 68) | 58 (52, 71) | 58 (55, 66) | 67 (64, 69) | 0.520 |
| Gender | 0.410 | ||||
| Female | 16 (42%) | 7 (44%) | 6 (33%) | 3 (75%) | |
| Male | 22 (58%) | 9 (56%) | 12 (67%) | 1 (25%) | |
| Primary tumor | 0.130 | ||||
| Colon | 17 (45%) | 8 (50%) | 5 (28%) | 4 (100%) | |
| Rectum | 13 (34%) | 4 (25%) | 9 (50%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Sigmoid | 8 (21%) | 4 (25%) | 4 (22%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Primary tumor position | 0.003 | ||||
| Left-sided tumor | 21 (55%) | 8 (50%) | 13 (72%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Right-sided tumor | 17 (45%) | 8 (50%) | 5 (28%) | 4 (100%) | |
| Differentiation | 0.100 | ||||
| Well | 7 (18%) | 6 (38%) | 1 (5.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Well-moderate | 17 (45%) | 6 (38%) | 10 (56%) | 1 (25%) | |
| Moderate | 6 (16%) | 1 (6.2%) | 4 (22%) | 1 (25%) | |
| Poor | 5 (13%) | 2 (12%) | 1 (5.6%) | 2 (50%) | |
| Unknown | 3 (7.9%) | 1 (6.2%) | 2 (11%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Morphology | 0.450 | ||||
| Infiltrative | 3 (7.9%) | 3 (19%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Protrusive | 3 (7.9%) | 2 (12%) | 1 (5.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Ulcerative | 27 (71%) | 9 (56%) | 14 (78%) | 4 (100%) | |
| Protrusive/ulcerative | 5 (13%) | 2 (12%) | 3 (17%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Invasion | 0.027 | ||||
| Muscularis | 2 (5.3%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (11%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Serosa | 13 (34%) | 5 (31%) | 4 (22%) | 4 (100%) | |
| Pericolonic | 23 (61%) | 11 (69%) | 12 (67%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Primary CRC (max) | 0.240 | ||||
| <5 cm | 25 (66%) | 11 (69%) | 13 (72%) | 1 (25%) | |
| ≥5 cm | 13 (34%) | 5 (31%) | 5 (28%) | 3 (75%) | |
| Clinical T stage | 0.012 | ||||
| T3 | 35 (92%) | 15 (94%) | 18 (100%) | 2 (50%) | |
| T4 | 3 (7.9%) | 1 (6.2%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (50%) | |
| Clinical N stage | 0.190 | ||||
| N0 | 9 (24%) | 3 (19%) | 6 (33%) | 0 (0%) | |
| N1 | 17 (45%) | 5 (31%) | 9 (50%) | 3 (75%) | |
| N2 | 12 (32%) | 8 (50%) | 3 (17%) | 1 (25%) | |
| BMI-1 expression in primary CRC | <0.001 | ||||
| Low | 22 (58%) | 15 (94%) | 6 (33%) | 1 (25%) | |
| Middle | 16 (42%) | 1 (6.2%) | 12 (67%) | 3 (75%) | |
| High | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Lymph node metastasis ratio | 0.13 (0.01, 0.33) | 0.28 (0.06, 0.40) | 0.05 (0.00, 0.20) | 0.11 (0.08, 0.18) | 0.310 |
| Liver metastasis (max) | 0.130 | ||||
| <5 cm | 30 (79%) | 10 (62%) | 16 (89%) | 4 (100%) | |
| ≥5 cm | 8 (21%) | 6 (38%) | 2 (11%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Liver metastasis number | 0.990 | ||||
| Multiple | 21 (55%) | 9 (56%) | 10 (56%) | 2 (50%) | |
| Single | 17 (45%) | 7 (44%) | 8 (44%) | 2 (50%) | |
| Synchronous liver metastasis | 0.055 | ||||
| Yes | 7 (18%) | 3 (19%) | 2 (11%) | 2 (50%) | |
| No | 11 (29%) | 2 (12%) | 9 (50%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Unknown | 20 (53%) | 11 (69%) | 7 (39%) | 2 (50%) | |
Statistics presented: median (IQR); n (%).
Statistical tests performed: Kruskal–Wallis test; Fisher's exact test.
According to embryologic origin.
Figure 2BMI-1 is essential for malignant transformation of CRC cells. (A) BMI-1 knockdown significantly inhibited colony formation. BMI-1 was knocked down using lentiviral shRNA in HCT116 and LOVO cells. Cells were seeded in 6-well plate, colony formation was observed after 7 days. Data are presented as mean ± SD; ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. control cells. (B) Representative micrographs and quantification of cell migration in the transwell migration assay (without matrigel). Migrated cells were plotted as the average number of cells per field of view from 3 different experiments, as described in Methods. Scale bar: 100 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD; ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. control cells. (C) BMI-1 knockdown significantly inhibited cell migration. The migration properties of the cells were analyzed in LOVO cells by wound healing assay. Cells were grown to confluent on 6-well plates. A scratch was made through the cell layer using a pipette tip. Photographs of the wounded area (n = 3) were taken immediately after the scratch was made (0 h) and 48 or 72 h later in order to monitor cell movement into the wounded area. Scale bar: 100 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD; ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. control cells (Student's t-test). (D) Quantification of cell migration in the sh-Control and sh-BMI-1 CRC cells. (E) CRC cells were replated on coverslips. After an additional 24 h, cells were stained for vimentin and snail, then analyzed by confocal microscopy. The red signal represents staining for the corresponding protein, while the blue signal signifies nuclear DNA staining with DAPI. Scale bar: 50 μm. (F) Expression of the epithelial proteins α-catenin, the mesenchymal protein vimentin, and snail in CRC cells were detected by Western blot analysis. GAPDH was used as a loading control.
Figure 3BMI-1 upregulates snail expression. (A) Western blot analysis of the indicated proteins involved in AKT/GSK-3β signaling. (B) PI3K inhibitor wortmannin treatment inhibited BMI-1-activated AKT/GSK-3β/snail signaling in DLD1 cells. (C) Western blot analysis of BMI-1, snail, E-cadherin, and vimentin. GAPDH was used as a control. Snail knockdown significantly decreased BMI-1-enhanced EMT, while snail overexpression promoted BMI-1 knockdown inhibited EMT. (D) Representative images and corresponding statistical analysis of transwell assay. Migrated cells were plotted as the average number of cells per field of view from 3 different experiments. BMI-1 knockdown inhibited CRC cells migration, while BMI-1 overexpression promoted migration. Scale bar: 100 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD; ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. control cells.
Figure 4BMI-1 was positive correlated with snail in CRC tissues. (A) A clear positive correlation was observed between BMI-1 and snail in human CRC tissues. (B) BMI-1 expression in paired tissues from 5 CRC patients was detected by Western blot analysis. β-Actin was used as a control. N, non-cancerous tissues; C, primary CRC tissues; LM, liver metastases.
Figure 5BMI-1 promoted CRC liver metastasis in vivo. (A) Representative images of spleen and liver in nude mice injected with LOVO sh-Control or LOVO sh-BMI-1 cells (n = 7 per group). Three weeks after injection of the transfected cells into the spleens of athymic nude mice, animals were killed and livers were examined for metastatic nodules. The numbers of metastatic nodules in the livers were significantly reduced in mice injected with LOVO sh-BMI-1 cells compared with LOVO sh-Control cells. (B) Number of the metastasis nodules per liver was counted in mice injected with indicated cells (n = 7 or 10 per group). (C) Histological BMI-1 and snail staining performed on liver metastasis samples from mice injected with HCT116 sh-Control or HCT116 sh-BMI-1, DLD1 vector or DLD1 BMI-1 cells. Representative images of liver sections are shown. Scale bars, 100 μm. (D) BMI-1 and snail protein expression in mouse livers of different groups was assessed by Western blot analysis. GAPDH was used as a control.
Figure 6NaB inhibited CRC liver metastasis in vivo. (A) NaB treatment reduced liver metastasis and malignant ascites in mice injected with HCT116 cells (n = 6 or 7 per group). Three weeks after injection of HCT116 cells into the spleens of athymic nude mice, animals were killed and livers were examined for metastatic nodules. (B) Number of the metastasis nodules per liver was counted in mice injected with HCT116 or LOVO cells with/without NaB treatment (n = 6 or 7 per group). NaB treatment significantly reduced the number of liver metastases. (C) Histological BMI-1 staining performed on liver metastasis samples from mice injected with LOVO cells with/without NaB treatment. Representative images of liver sections are shown at 100× and 400× magnification, respectively (Scale bar: 50 μm). (D) Western blot analysis of BMI-1 and snail protein expression in livers of mice injected with LOVO cells with/without NaB treatment. GAPDH was used as a control.