Literature DB >> 34094544

Prognostic value of pre-treatment maximum standardized uptake value and CRP in radiotherapy of esophageal cancer.

Haruka Jinnouchi1, Hideomi Yamashita1, Tomoki Kiritoshi1, Yosuke Miki1, Atsuto Katano1, Keiichi Nakagawa1, Osamu Abe1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the pre-treatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and CRP in patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A retrospective review of 69 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy between 2013 and 2016 was performed. The total radiotherapy doses were 50, 50.4 or 60 Gy. The endpoints of the present study were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The median follow-up for censored cases was 45.7 months. In 56 patients, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography was performed within 1 month prior to chemoradiotherapy. Data on CRP within 1 month prior to chemoradiotherapy were available for all patients. In the group of SUVmax >12.85, the rates of 2-year OS and DFS were 49.0 and 35.7%, respectively. In the group of SUVmax ≤12.85, these values were 72.4 and 67.1%, respectively (P=0.048 and P=0.057, respectively). In the group of CRP ≥1 mg/dl, these percentages were 38.5 and 25.0%, respectively. In the group of CRP <1 mg/dl, these rates were 71.2 and 59.7%, respectively (P=0.013 and P<0.001, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed that pre-treatment serum CRP levels remained an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS [OS: hazard ratio (HR), 0.25, P=001; DFS: HR, 0.28, P=0.005]. In conclusion, high SUVmax was associated with lower OS, while high CRP was associated with lower OS and DFS.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRP; esophageal cancer; maximum standardized uptake value; prognostic factor; radiotherapy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34094544      PMCID: PMC8165700          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  28 in total

1.  Influence of pathological nodal status and maximal standardized uptake value of the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes on treatment plans in patients with advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chun-Ta Liao; Hung-Ming Wang; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Chien-Yu Lin; Shu-Hang Ng; Shiang-Fu Huang; I-How Chen; Chuen Hsueh; Li-Yu Lee; Chih-Hung Lin; Ann-Joy Cheng; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Prognostic value of the standardized uptake value in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Henderik L van Westreenen; John T M Plukker; David C P Cobben; Carolien J M Verhoogt; Henk Groen; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Use of pretreatment metabolic tumor volumes on PET-CT to predict the survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus treated by curative surgery.

Authors:  Weng-Yoon Shum; Hueisch-Jy Ding; Ji-An Liang; Kuo-Yang Yen; Shang-Wen Chen; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  Involved-field irradiation concurrently combined with nedaplatin/5-fluorouracil for inoperable esophageal cancer on basis of (18)FDG-PET scans: a phase II study.

Authors:  Hideomi Yamashita; Mami Omori; Ryousuke Takenaka; Kae Okuma; Reiko Kobayashi; Kuni Ohtomo; Keiichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Complications following Salvage Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer after Definitive Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Keijiro Sugimura; Hiroshi Miyata; Naoki Shinno; Hajime Ushigome; Kei Asukai; Hisashi Hara; Shinichiro Hasegawa; Daisaku Yamada; Kazuyoshi Yamamoto; Naotsugu Haraguchi; Junichi Nishimura; Masaaki Motoori; Hiroshi Wada; Hidenori Takahashi; Masayoshi Yasui; Takeshi Omori; Masayuki Ohue; Masahiko Yano
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.935

7.  Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: How to Improve Outcomes?

Authors:  Charlotte Cohen; Williams Tessier; Caroline Gronnier; Florence Renaud; Arnaud Pasquer; Jérémie Théreaux; Johan Gagnière; Bernard Meunier; Denis Collet; Guillaume Piessen; Christophe Mariette
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Efficacy and feasibility of ambulatory treatment-based monthly nedaplatin plus S-1 in definitive or salvage concurrent chemoradiotherapy for early, advanced, and relapsed esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hideomi Yamashita; Akihiro Haga; Ryousuke Takenaka; Tomoki Kiritoshi; Kae Okuma; Kuni Ohtomo; Keiichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  FDG PET using SUVmax for preoperative T-staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Yung-Cheng Huang; Hung-I Lu; Shun-Chen Huang; Chien-Chin Hsu; Nan-Tsing Chiu; Yu-Ming Wang; Yi-Chun Chiu; Shau-Hsuan Li
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Pre-treatment levels of C-reactive protein and squamous cell carcinoma antigen for predicting the aggressiveness of pharyngolaryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hsuan-Ho Chen; Hung-Ming Wang; Kang-Hsing Fan; Chien-Yu Lin; Tzu-Chen Yen; Chun-Ta Liao; I-How Chen; Chung-Jan Kang; Shiang-Fu Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.