| Literature DB >> 34094428 |
Justin M Hoffman1, Christos D Malliakas1, Siraj Sidhik2, Ido Hadar1, Rebecca McClain1, Aditya D Mohite2, Mercouri G Kanatzidis1.
Abstract
Two-dimensional (Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 34094428 PMCID: PMC8162985 DOI: 10.1039/d0sc04144k
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Fig. 1(a and b) Crystal structures of n = 1–4 for (a) IBA and (b) IAA. The structure for IAA n = 2 is shown without modulation. On the right is the view of the structures perpendicular to the layers of n = 3 for IBA and IAA showing the similar in-plane distortion of the octahedra. Different layers are shown in different colors. (c) Optical images of crystals of IBA (top) and IAA (bottom) in order of increase n from left to right.
Fig. 2(a) The modulated IAA n = 2 structure viewed along the (1 0 1) axis showing a single wave in the structure. The minimum and maximum interlayer distances are labeled in red and green, respectively. (b) The diffraction of a single crystal showing the supercell reflections. (c) A view of the crystal structure looking perpendicular to a single layer. The areas colored in green indicate maximum interlayer spacing between two arbitrary layers, and red indicates minimum interlayer spacing.
Fig. 3(a) The average equatorial angles for branched and straight-chain amines shows the overall increase in angle for the branched amines. For IAA n = 2, two points are shown. The top is for the direction along the wave modulation and the bottom for the direction perpendicular to it. (b) The interlayer spacing for branched and straight-chain amines shows the increase in spacing for the branched amines. Note that for IAA n = 2, both the minimum and maximum interlayer spacings were plotted here. (c) A comparison of interlayer spacing for BA (left) and IAA (right) with the bold line in the center highlighting the inability of the branch amines to cross.
Fig. 4Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) for (a) IBA and (b) IAA, normalized for clarity.
Fig. 5(a) The reflectance spectra for each system transformed via the Kubelka–Munk equation. To find the bandgap, the linear portion of the spectra with energy above the bandgap (shown by purple arrows) was extrapolated to the x-axis. (b) Photoluminescence for each system. (c and d) A comparison of bandgap and PL, respectively, for the two systems, showing that the IAA is blue-shifted for all n values except the modulated structure, n = 2.
Fig. 6Photoemission yield spectroscopy in air (PYSA) of (a) IBA and (b) IAA, compared to MAPbI3 (n = inf).
Fig. 7Resistivity measurements of IBA and IAA n = 4 crystals parallel to the layers, both in the dark and under white light. Note the strong photovoltaic response for each.
Fig. 8(a and c) GIWAXS patterns for IAA and IBA n = 4 films using one-step spincoating. (b and d) The films with an MACl additive show less broadening along χ, indicative of more preferred orientation.
Fig. 9(a) The architecture used for these devices. “2D Perovskite” refers to either IAA or IBA n = 4 with 2.5 wt% MACl added. (b and c) Representative device curves for each material, showing scans in both directions. (d) The reflectance data of each film transformed by the Kubelk–Munk equation, showing the appearance of various n peaks. (e) The EQE spectrum of representative devices for each material.
| (IBA)2PbI4 | (IBA)2(MA)Pb2I7 | (IBA)2(MA)2Pb3I10 | (IBA)2(MA)3Pb4I13 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crystal system | Monoclinic | Monoclinic | Monoclinic | Monoclinic |
| Space group |
|
|
|
|
| Unit cell dimensions (Å) | 13.8298(7) | 38.9330(15) | 8.9429(6) | 8.9397(6) |
| 8.9872(3) | 8.9419(2) | 8.9415(4) | 8.9386(7) | |
| 8.7822(3) | 8.8520(3) | 51.048(3) | 63.648(4) | |
| 108.213(5)° | 90.112(3)° | 90.006(5)° | 90.015(6)° | |
| Volume (Å3) | 1036.86(8) | 3081.69(17) | 4082.0(16) | 5086(2) |
|
| 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Density (calcd) (g cm−3) | 2.7645 | 3.1966 | 3.4416 | 3.5562 |
| Absorption coefficient | 14.074 | 17.924 | 19.915 | 21.104 |
| Independent reflections | 12 785 [ | 2768 [ | 3587 [ | 6873 [ |
| Completeness | 99% | 98% | 97% | 94% |
| Data/restraints/parameters | 12 785/8/41 | 9867/9/62 | 3587/9/84 | 6873/10/105 |
| Goodness-of-fit | 2.40 | 5.41 | 3.57 | 1.30 |
| Final |
|
|
|
|
| w | w | w | w | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| w | w | w | w | |
| Largest diff. peak and hole (e·Å3) | 1.61 and −1.60 | 3.12 and −2.58 | 3.98 and −4.84 | 4.45 and −2.41 |
R = ∑‖Fo| − |Fc‖/∑|Fo|, wR = {∑[w(|Fo|2 − |Fc|2)2]/∑[w(|Fo|4)]}1/2 and w = 1/(σ2(I) + 0.0004I2).
| (IAA)2PbI4 | (IAA)2(MA)Pb2I7 | (IAA)2(MA)2Pb3I10 | (IAA)2(MA)3Pb4I13 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crystal system | Monoclinic | Monoclinic | Monoclinic | Monoclinic |
| Space group |
|
|
|
|
| Unit cell dimensions (Å) | 16.559(4) | 8.8957(4) | 8.9061(4) | 8.9275(10) |
| 8.7623(14) | 42.8038(19) | 55.689(3) | 68.140(10) | |
| 8.7693(16) | 8.9021(4) | 8.9027(5) | 8.9142(10) | |
| 105.3538(16)° | 89.326(3)° | 90.055(4)° | 90.551(9)° | |
|
| N/A | 1/8 | N/A | N/A |
| Volume (Å3) | 1227.0(5) | 3389.4(3) | 4415.5(16) | 5422.4(12) |
|
| 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Density (calcd) (g cm−3) | 2.4121 | 2.5764 | 3.2058 | 3.3699 |
| Absorption coefficient (mm−1) | 11.898 | 16.277 | 18.412 | 19.797 |
| Independent reflections | 3105 [ | 7455 (2766 main + 5029 satellites) [ | 4003 [ | 4785 [ |
| Completeness | 99% | 97% | 98% | 97% |
| Data/restraints/parameters | 3105/10/46 | 7455/0/496 | 4003/11/90 | 4785/12/114 |
| Goodness-of-fit | 3.30 | 2.25 | 2.32 | 0.80 |
| Final |
|
|
|
|
| w | w | w | w | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| w | w | w | w | |
| Largest diff. peak and hole (e·Å−3) | 2.78 and −2.07 | 2.70 and −2.97 | 5.91 and −7.14 | 1.95 and −2.56 |