| Literature DB >> 34093858 |
Yuefei Fang1,2, Yang He2,3, Canhao Wu1,2, Meng Zhang2, Zeyun Gu2,3, Jiaxin Zhang2, Ergang Liu4, Qin Xu1, Akmal M Asrorov2, Yongzhuo Huang2,3,4,5.
Abstract
Background: Immunotherapy has profoundly changed the landscape of cancer management and represented the most significant breakthrough. Yet, it is a formidable challenge that the majority of cancers - the so-called "cold" tumors - poorly respond to immunotherapy. To find a general immunoregulatory modality that can be applied to a broad spectrum of cancers is an urgent need.Entities:
Keywords: CSF1R inhibitor; immune memory; magnetic hyperthermia; magnetic liposomes; targeted delivery; tumor microenvironment; tumor-associated macrophage
Year: 2021 PMID: 34093858 PMCID: PMC8171105 DOI: 10.7150/thno.57511
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1Characterization of TAT-BLZmlips. (A) Particle size, magnetic adsorption, and TEM image of TAT-BLZmlips. (B) Magnetic hysteresis loop of TAT-BLZmlips at 300 K. (C) Heating efficiency of TAT-BLZmlips. (D) Particle size measured in PBS containing 10% FBS. (E) Drug release curves of TAT-BLZmlips at different temperatures. (F) The viability of tumor cells after treatment with TAT-BLZmlips; it shows little cytotoxicity of the magnetic materials and BLZ945. (G) Fluorescent images of cell uptake, scale bar: 100 µm. (H) Cellular uptake of TAT-BLZmlips modified with different TAT densities in CT26 cells. (I) The cellular uptake efficiency at various incubation times. (J) Fluorescent images of penetration of tumor spheroids, scale bar: 200 µm.
Figure 2TAT-BLZmlips mediated magnetic hyperthermia in vitro. (A) Scheme of the treatment procedure. (B) Flow cytometry scattergram of tumor cell apoptosis. (C) Statistical analysis of apoptosis rate in MΦ/CT26 coculture. (D) Statistical analysis of the apoptosis rate in a non-direct cell-cell contact study. (E) Western blotting assay of the tumor cells after TAT-mlips-mediated MHT. (F) Fluorescent images of colocalization of CRT and cell membrane, scale bar: 100 µm. (G, H) Quantification of CRT exposure in CT-26 cancer cells after treatment. (I) Quantity analysis of the released ATP. (J) The dot plots of CD86+ or CD206+ MΦ. Statistical analysis of the F4/80+/CD206+ MΦ (K), F4/80+/CD86+ MΦ subsets (L), and the ratio of M1/M2Φ (M) after treatments.
Figure 3Magnetic navigation increased the intratumoral accumulation of TAT-BLZmlips. (A) The in vivo imaging photos. (B) The Infrared imaging of MHT. (C) Statistical results of in vivo imaging at the tumor sites. (D) Ex vivo imaging of the tumors. (E) Statistical results of ex vivo imaging at the dissected tumors. (F) Ex vivo imaging of the major organs. Three mice per group (n = 3).
Figure 4TAT-BLZmlips mediated mild MHT and CSF1R inhibition in cancer therapy. (A) Schematic illustration of the therapy regimen. (B) The tumor volume curves. Photographs (C) and tumor weight (D) at the end of the first regimen. (E) The tumor volume curve after inoculating the re-challenged tumor cells (n=3 for PBS group, and n =5 for other two groups). (F) Percentage of tumor-free animals (G) Western blotting assay of iNOS, TNF-α, and ARG1 in the tumors after treatment. (H) F4/80+/CD206+ M2Φ subsets in the tumors after treatment. (I) F4/80+/CD86+ M1Φ subsets in the tumors after treatment. (J) The ratio of M1/ M2Φ in the tumors after treatment. (K) CD11C+/CD86+ DC subsets in the lymph nodes after treatment. (L) CD11C+/CD86+ DC subsets in the tumors after treatment. (M) CD8+ T cells subsets in the tumors after treatment. (N) CD8+/IFN-γ+ T cells subsets in the tumors after treatment. (O) Typical flow cytometry plots of effector memory T cells (CD8+ CD44+ CD62L-) in the spleen after tumor re-inoculation. Five mice per group (n = 5).
Figure 5Remodeling tumor blood vessels. (A) Immunofluorescence staining of CD31 (red, tumor vessels) and PDGFRb (green, pericytes), scale bar: 200 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of CD31+ blood vessel density and PDGFRb+ pericytes. (C) Expression of vessel-stabilizing factors in the tumors. (D) Expression of pro-angiogenesis factors in the tumors.
The gradient elution
| Time (min) | A | B |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 80% | 20% |
| 2 | 80% | 20% |
| 7 | 5% | 95% |
| 10 | 0% | 100% |
| 12 | 0% | 100% |
| 12 | 80% | 20% |