| Literature DB >> 34093826 |
Yongping Zhang1, Song Xue1, Qi Hao1, Fuhong Liu1, Wenqiu Huang1, Jingbo Wang1.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a deadly heterogeneous hematologic malignancy. Despite the well-characterized genetic characteristics and new promising targeted therapies for AML, the clinical outcome remains suboptimal. Galectin-9 (Gal-9) is a good potential target due to its immunosuppressive capacity in inflammatory processes. In our study, we firstly performed a wide range of integrated bioinformatical approach to assess the importance of Gal-9 by analyzing the expression, potential function and prognostic impact in AML. The results indicated that Gal-9 is overexpressed in AML cells, especially when relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and predicts poor prognosis. Co-expression analysis showed Gal-9 has a strong positive correlation with proteasome subunit beta type-8 (PSMB8), which was also highly expressed in AML with poor prognosis, implying a synergy in cell survival, cell signaling and the development of AML. In summary, we have confirmed the overexpression of Gal-9 and its partner PSMB8 in AML and validated their importance as prognostic factors. We propose that Gal-9 and PSMB8 could be a promising molecular target for treatment of AML and may provide more combined treatment options, especially in patients with relapse after HSCT. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: Galectin-9 (Gal-9); acute myeloid leukemia (AML); bioinformatics analysis; biomarker; prognosis; proteasome subunit beta type-8 (PSMB8)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34093826 PMCID: PMC8176406 DOI: 10.7150/jca.53686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Clinic parameters of AML patients and healthy donors
| Parameter | HSCT-R (n=22) | Chemo-R (n=35) | Donors (n=15) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 29 (16-54) | 41 (14-64) | 36 (6-64) |
| Sex | 10M; 12F | 22M; 13F | 8M; 7F |
| Blast counts (%) (±SD), P=0.20 | 53.8 (±30.4) | 41.5 (±28.8) | - |
| Mean Gal-9 counts (%) (±SD) | 31.4(±43.3) | 13.5 (±26.1) | 0.9 (±0.64) |
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; R, relapsed; Chemo, chemotherapy; M, male; F, female; Gal-9, Galectin-9; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1LGALS9 (Galectin-9) mRNA and protein expression was elevated in AML. (A) Box plots derived from gene expression data in ONCOMINE comparing expression of LGALS9 in normal and AML samples. The p value was set up at 0.01 and fold change was defined as 2. (B) Meta-analysis of LGALS9 mRNA expression levels across 4 analyses in Oncomine database. (C,D) The GEPIA database verified that LGALS9 gene expression was significantly upregulated in AML samples (LAML) (n=173) compared with normal samples (n=70), *P < 0.05. (E) Galectin-9 protein was highly expressed on the cell surface of AML cells, especially when relapse after HSCT compared with healthy donor derived mononuclear bone marrow cells and AML cells without HSCT in clinical practice. (F) LGALS9 has several isoforms, the mRNA expression level of LGALS9-005 ranked the highest among different protein coding types.
Figure 2LGALS9 was distinctively high expressed AML cell lines from CCLE analysis and prognostic significances of LGALS9 gene expression. (A) The mRNA expression level of LGALS9 ranked the second highest in a variety of cancer cell line (shown in red frame). (B) LGALS9 overexpression predicts unfavorable overall survival in patients with AML.
Figure 3KEGG and GO enrichment analysis revealing functional association of LGALS9 with immunoproteasome. (A) Venn diagram represents the intersection of the top 200 positively corrected genes between the UALCAN database and the GEPIA database, 138 common co-expressed genes were obtained. (B) GO enrichment of co-expressed genes in biological process, cellular component and molecular function. (C) KEGG enrichment analysis of co-expressed genes with LGALS9. False discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 was set as the cut-off criterion.
Figure 4Construction of PPI network of LGALS9 positive-correlation genes and analysis of hub genes. (A) Correlation between LGALS9 and PSMB8 mRNA expression determined using GEPIA database. (B) The top ten hub genes were identified using cytoHubba tool kits in Cytoscape. (C) Clustering analysis of LGALS9 co-expressed genes by STRING tools. (D) The KEGG pathway analysis of hub genes using WebGestalt web tool.
Figure 5Over survival analyses of hub genes in AML using GEPIA database. 7 of the10 hub genes exhibited poorer overall survival rate in higher expression groups.