Literature DB >> 34093727

Evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of permissive hypotension in critically ill patients aged 65 years or over with vasodilatory hypotension: Protocol for the 65 randomised clinical trial.

Alvin Richards-Belle1, Paul R Mouncey1, Richard D Grieve2, David A Harrison1, M Zia Sadique2, Doreen Henry3, Chris Whitman3, Julie Camsooksai4, Anthony C Gordon5,6, J Duncan Young7, Kathryn M Rowan1, François Lamontagne8.   

Abstract

Vasodilatory shock is common in critically ill patients and vasopressors are a mainstay of therapy. A meta-analysis suggested that use of a higher, as opposed to a lower, mean arterial pressure target to guide titration of vasopressor therapy, could be associated with a higher risk of death in older critically ill patients. The 65 trial is a pragmatic, multi-centre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised clinical trial of permissive hypotension (a mean arterial pressure target of 60 -65 mmHg during vasopressor therapy) versus usual care in critically ill patients aged 65 years or over with vasodilatory hypotension. The trial is conducted in 2600 patients from 65 United Kingdom adult, general critical care units. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 90 days. An economic evaluation is embedded. The 65 trial received favourable ethical opinion from the South Central - Oxford C Research Ethics Committee and approval from the Health Research Authority. The results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed medical journals. Trial registration: ISRCTN10580502. © The Intensive Care Society 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vasopressors, mean arterial pressure, critical care, intensive care, clinical trial

Year:  2020        PMID: 34093727      PMCID: PMC8142090          DOI: 10.1177/1751143720971433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc        ISSN: 1751-1437


  5 in total

1.  CCCS-SSAI WikiRecs clinical practice guideline: vasopressor blood pressure targets in critically ill adults with hypotension and vasopressor use in early traumatic shock.

Authors:  B Rochwerg; M Hylands; M H Møller; P Asfar; D Cohen; R G Khadaroo; J H Laake; A Perner; T Tanguay; S Widder; P Vandvik; A Kristiansen; F Lamontagne
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Pierre Asfar; Ferhat Meziani; Jean-François Hamel; Fabien Grelon; Bruno Megarbane; Nadia Anguel; Jean-Paul Mira; Pierre-François Dequin; Soizic Gergaud; Nicolas Weiss; François Legay; Yves Le Tulzo; Marie Conrad; René Robert; Frédéric Gonzalez; Christophe Guitton; Fabienne Tamion; Jean-Marie Tonnelier; Pierre Guezennec; Thierry Van Der Linden; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Eric Mariotte; Gaël Pradel; Olivier Lesieur; Jean-Damien Ricard; Fabien Hervé; Damien du Cheyron; Claude Guerin; Alain Mercat; Jean-Louis Teboul; Peter Radermacher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

Authors:  Andrew Rhodes; Laura E Evans; Waleed Alhazzani; Mitchell M Levy; Massimo Antonelli; Ricard Ferrer; Anand Kumar; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Mark E Nunnally; Bram Rochwerg; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Richard J Beale; Geoffrey J Bellinghan; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig Coopersmith; Daniel P De Backer; Craig J French; Seitaro Fujishima; Herwig Gerlach; Jorge Luis Hidalgo; Steven M Hollenberg; Alan E Jones; Dilip R Karnad; Ruth M Kleinpell; Younsuk Koh; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Flavia R Machado; John J Marini; John C Marshall; John E Mazuski; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Anthony S McLean; Sangeeta Mehta; Rui P Moreno; John Myburgh; Paolo Navalesi; Osamu Nishida; Tiffany M Osborn; Anders Perner; Colleen M Plunkett; Marco Ranieri; Christa A Schorr; Maureen A Seckel; Christopher W Seymour; Lisa Shieh; Khalid A Shukri; Steven Q Simpson; Mervyn Singer; B Taylor Thompson; Sean R Townsend; Thomas Van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; W Joost Wiersinga; Janice L Zimmerman; R Phillip Dellinger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Higher versus lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in shock: a multicentre pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  François Lamontagne; Maureen O Meade; Paul C Hébert; Pierre Asfar; François Lauzier; Andrew J E Seely; Andrew G Day; Sangeeta Mehta; John Muscedere; Sean M Bagshaw; Niall D Ferguson; Deborah J Cook; Salmaan Kanji; Alexis F Turgeon; Margaret S Herridge; Sanjay Subramanian; Jacques Lacroix; Neill K J Adhikari; Damon C Scales; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Yoanna Skrobik; Richard P Whitlock; Robert S Green; Karen K Y Koo; Teddie Tanguay; Sheldon Magder; Daren K Heyland
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Pooled analysis of higher versus lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy septic and vasodilatory shock.

Authors:  François Lamontagne; Andrew G Day; Maureen O Meade; Deborah J Cook; Gordon H Guyatt; Mathieu Hylands; Peter Radermacher; Jean-Marie Chrétien; Nicolas Beaudoin; Paul Hébert; Frédérick D'Aragon; Ferhat Meziani; Pierre Asfar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 17.440

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.