| Literature DB >> 34093575 |
Liping Luo1,2, Jinping Zhang1, Mingyan Liu1, Shengrong Qiu1, Shengxiang Yi1, Wenjie Yu1, Tao Liu1, Xueyong Huang1, Fangjian Ning1,2.
Abstract
Honey produced from medicinal plants holds great promise for human health. Increasing evidence suggests that the gut microbiota plays an important role in liver pathology after alcohol intake. The aim of this study was to identify the polyphenol composition of triadica cochinchinensis honey (TCH), and to study the potential effect of honey polyphenols on the regulation of gut microbes in mice with alcohol-induced liver injury and the improvement of alcohol-induced liver disease. For these purposes, a total of 190 compounds were identified and 27 of them were quantified by ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q/TOF-MS) and we successfully established a mouse model of alcohol-induced liver injury. The results show that TCH polyphenols can significantly restore the levels of ALT and AST, and TCH intervention can significantly improve the pathological changes of liver tissue in alcohol-exposed mice. Additionally, a significant decrease was observed in Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes after TCH treatment. Moreover, KEGG pathways of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, two-component system and biosynthesis of amino acids enriched the most differentially expressed genes after TCH intervention for 8 weeks. Our results may have important implications for the use of TCH as a functional food component with potential therapeutic utility against alcohol-induced liver disease.Entities:
Keywords: Triadica Cochinchinensis; alcohol-induced liver disease; gut microbiota; honey; polyphenols
Year: 2021 PMID: 34093575 PMCID: PMC8175904 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.673903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Compounds detected in Citrus nectars and honeys in negative ion mode.
| Pear No | Compound | Formula | CAS | RT(min) | Theoretical (m/z negative) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1* | Gallic acid | C7H6O5 | 149-91-7 | 1.39 | 169.0129 |
| 2* | 3,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid | C7H6O4 | 99-50-3 | 2.29 | 153.0188 |
| 3* | Salicylic acid | C7H6O3 | 69-72-7 | 3.16 | 137.0245 |
| 4* | Chlorogenic acid | C16H18O9 | 327-97-9 | 3.3 | 353.0873 |
| 5* | Epicatechin | C15H14O6 | 35323-91-2 | 3.36 | 290.0752 |
| 6* | Caffeic acid | C9H8O4 | 331-39-5 | 3.66 | 179.0344 |
| 7* | Rutin | C27H30O16 | 153-18-4 | 4.23 | 609.1456 |
| 8* | Ellagic acid | C14H6O8 | 476-66-4 | 4.33 | 300.9985 |
| 9* | Genistein 7-O-glucoside | C21H20O10 | 529-59-9 | 4.46 | 432.1019 |
| 10 | Isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside | C22H22O12 | 5041-82-7 | 4.58 | 477.1034 |
| 11* | p-Hydroxybenzoic acid | C7H6O3 | 99-96-7 | 4.85 | 137.0239 |
| 12* | Fisetin | C15H10O6 | 528-48-3 | 4.98 | 285.0399 |
| 13 | Dihydrokaempferol | C15H12O6 | 480-20-6 | 5.03 | 287.0556 |
| 14* | Methyl syringate | C10H12O5 | 884-35-5 | 5.24 | 212.0647 |
| 15* | 3,4-Dimethoxycinnamic acid | C11H12O4 | 2316-26-9 | 5.3 | 207.0657 |
| 16* | Abscisic acid | C15H20O4 | 14375-45-2 | 5.45 | 263.1291 |
| 17* | Luteolin | C15H10O6 | 491-70-3 | 5.49 | 285.0399 |
| 18* | Quercetin | C15H10O7 | 117-39-5 | 5.52 | 301.0348 |
| 19 | Pinobanksin-5-methyl ether | C16H14O5 | 119309-36-3 | 5.74 | 285.0758 |
| 20* | Naringenin | C15H12O5 | 480-41-1 | 5.98 | 271.0606 |
| 21* | Apigenin | C15H10O5 | 520-36-5 | 5.99 | 269.0450 |
| 22* | Kaempferol | C15H10O6 | 520-18-3 | 6.08 | 285.0399 |
| 23 | Luteolin 5-methyl ether | C16H12O6 | 58115-29-0 | 6.12 | 299.0561 |
| 24 | 3-O-Acetylpinobanksin | C17H14O6 | 52117-69-8 | 6.29 | 314.0714 |
| 25* | Phenethyl caffeate | C17H16O4 | 104594-70-9 | 7.71 | 283.0973 |
| 26* | Biochanin A | C16H12O5 | 491-80-5 | 7.77 | 283.0606 |
| 27 | Galangin-5-methyl ether | C16H12O5 | 104594-69-6 | 7.95 | 283.0613 |
*Confirmed using standards.
Figure 1UPLC-Q/TOF-MS spectra of some polyphenols in HCT in negative ion pattern: (A) salicylic acid; (B) rutin; (C) quercetin; (D) narigenin; (E) luteolin; (F) kaemperol; (G) epicatedin; (H) caffeic acid.
Figure 2(A) Effects of TCH on serum ALT and AST. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05). (B) Photomicrographs of liver sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE × 400).
Figure 3Rarefaction analysis (A) and Shannon index (B) of gut microbiota from seven groups of mice.
The composition table of dominant species in each group of mouse intestinal flora phylum level.
| Phylum | PF | AF | PC | LH | MH | HH | FG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteroidota | 69.34% | 48.62% | 64.31% | 54.96% | 48.71% | 42.75% | 48.55% |
| Firmicutes | 23.54% | 39.78% | 26.45% | 31.49% | 37.49% | 44.85% | 35.94% |
| Campilobacterota | 2.07% | 1.98% | 3.01% | 9.10% | 8.10% | 3.28% | 8.60% |
| Actinobacteriota | 2.19% | 4.18% | 2.50% | 0.29% | 1.89% | 3.47% | 1.51% |
| Verrucomicrobiota | 1.49% | 2.86% | 2.45% | 2.59% | 0.77% | 1.57% | 3.31% |
| Proteobacteria | 0.33% | 1.30% | 0.30% | 0.57% | 1.85% | 3.31% | 0.64% |
| Desulfobacterota | 0.70% | 0.79% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.73% | 0.36% | 1.12% |
| Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio (F/B) | 33.95% | 81.82% | 41.13% | 57.30% | 76.97% | 104.91% | 74.03% |
Figure 4TCH alters gut microbiota structure in mice. Structures of gut microbiota of mice were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and bioinformatics analysis. The relative Community heatmap analysis on phylum level (A). The composition and relative abundances of the gut microbiota at the phylum level (B). Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots based on unweighted UniFrac (C). Hierarchical clustering tree on OUT level (D).
Figure 5LEfSe analyses of gut microbiota in seven groups of mice. Differentially expressed taxa with the LDA scores > 2.0 and adjusted p < 0.05. The taxonomic cladogram shows the relative abundance of OTUs with circles representing phylogenetic levels from phylum (innermost circle) to species (outermost circle) and the diameter of each circle being proportional to the taxon’s abundance.
Figure 6Heatmap of key pathways in KEGG database at level 3 based on PICRUSt predicted functions of the gut microbiota, the colors range from blue to red (A). The relative abundances of the gut microbiota in COG function classification (B).