Literature DB >> 34092439

A Quantitative Analysis Investigating the Prevalence of "Manels" in Major Urology Meetings.

Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh1, Daniele Castellani2, Claudia Mercader3, Alba Sierra3, Flavio L Heldwein4, Erica On-Ting Chan5, Marcelo L Wroclawski6, Fabio Sepulveda7, Giovanni E Cacciamani8, Juan Gomez Rivas9, Declan G Murphy10, Inge M van Oort11, Stacy Loeb12, Maria J Ribal3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Female representation in urological meetings is important for gender equity.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the prevalence of "manels" or all-male speaking panels at urological meetings. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Urology meetings organized by major urological associations/societies from December 2019 to November 2020 were reviewed. Meeting information and details of the faculty were retrieved. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary outcomes were: (1) the percentage of male faculty in all included sessions and (2) the overall proportion of manels. We made further comparisons between manel and multigender sessions. Male and female faculty were stratified by quartiles of publications, citations, and H-index, and their mean numbers of sessions were compared. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 285 meeting sessions, 181 (63.5%) were manels. The mean percentage of male faculty was 86.9%. Male representation was very high in urology meetings for most disciplines and urological associations/societies, except for female urology meeting sessions and those organized by the International Continence Society. Nonmanel sessions had higher numbers of chairs/moderators (p = 0.027), speakers (p < 0.001), and faculty (p < 0.001) than manel sessions. A total of 1037 faculty members were included, and 900 of them (86.8%) were male. Male faculty had longer mean years of practice (23.8 vs 17.7 yr, p < 0.001) and was more likely to include professors (43.2% vs 17.5%, p < 0.001) than female faculty. Male faculty within the first quartile (ie, lower quartile) of publications and H-index had a significantly higher number of sessions than female faculty within the same quartile.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that manels are prevalent in urology meetings. There is evidence showing that males received more opportunities than females. A huge gender imbalance exists in urology meetings; urological associations and societies should actively strive for greater gender parity. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Women are under-represented in urology meetings. Urological associations and societies should play an active role to ensure a more balanced gender representation.
Copyright © 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender disparity; Gender equality; Gender inequality; Manel; Urology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34092439     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  2 in total

1.  Gender Equality in Indian Urology.

Authors:  Sanjay Sinha; Arvind P Ganpule
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2022-04-01

2.  On manels and manferences in urology.

Authors:  Imogen Patterson; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 14.432

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.