Luca Arcari1,2, Juergen Engel3, Tilo Freiwald3, Hui Zhou1,4, Hafisyatul Zainal1,5, Monika Gawor6, Stefan Buettner3, Helmut Geiger3, Ingeborg Hauser3, Eike Nagel1, Valentina O Puntmann7. 1. Institute of Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, DZHK Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 2. Cardiology Unit, Clinical and Molecular Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 3. Department of Nephrology, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 4. Department of Radiology, XiangYa Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. 5. Department of Cardiology, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sg. Buloh, Malaysia. 6. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. 7. Institute of Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, DZHK Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. valentina.puntmann@icloud.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) are often elevated in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and associated with both cardiovascular remodeling and outcome. Relationship between these biomarkers and quantitative imaging measures of myocardial fibrosis and edema by T1 and T2 mapping remains unknown. METHODS: Consecutive patients with established CKD and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 59 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 276) were compared to age/sex matched patients with eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 242) and healthy controls (n = 38). Comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with native T1 and T2 mapping, myocardial ischemia and scar imaging was performed with venous sampling immediately prior to CMR. RESULTS: Patients with CKD showed significant cardiac remodeling in comparison with both healthy individuals and non-CKD patients, including a stepwise increase of native T1 and T2 (p < 0.001 between all CKD stages). Native T1 and T2 were the sole imaging markers independently associated with worsening CKD in patients [B = 0.125 (95% CI 0.022-0.235) and B = 0.272 (95% CI 0.164-0.374) with p = 0.019 and < 0.001 respectively]. At univariable analysis, both hs-cTnT and NT-pro BNP significantly correlated with native T1 and T2 in groups with eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR < 29 ml/min/1.73 m2 groups, with associations being stronger at lower eGFR (NT-pro BNP (log transformed, lg10): native T1 r = 0.43 and r = 0.57, native T2 r = 0.39 and r = 0.48 respectively; log-transformed hs-cTnT(lg10): native T1 r = 0.23 and r = 0.43, native T2 r = 0.38 and r = 0.58 respectively, p < 0.001 for all, p < 0.05 for interaction). On multivariable analyses, we found independent associations of native T1 with NT-pro BNP [(B = 0.308 (95% CI 0.129-0.407), p < 0.001 and B = 0.334 (95% CI 0.154-0.660), p = 0.002 for eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR < 29 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively] and of T2 with hs-cTnT [B = 0.417 (95% CI 0.219-0.650), p < 0.001 for eGFR < 29 ml/min/1.73 m2]. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate independent associations between cardiac biomarkers with imaging markers of interstitial expansion, which are CKD-group specific. Our findings indicate the role of diffuse non-ischemic tissue processes, including excess of myocardial fluid in addition to diffuse fibrosis in CKD-related adverse remodeling.
BACKGROUND: High sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) are often elevated in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and associated with both cardiovascular remodeling and outcome. Relationship between these biomarkers and quantitative imaging measures of myocardial fibrosis and edema by T1 and T2 mapping remains unknown. METHODS: Consecutive patients with established CKD and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 59 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 276) were compared to age/sex matched patients with eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 242) and healthy controls (n = 38). Comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with native T1 and T2 mapping, myocardial ischemia and scar imaging was performed with venous sampling immediately prior to CMR. RESULTS:Patients with CKD showed significant cardiac remodeling in comparison with both healthy individuals and non-CKD patients, including a stepwise increase of native T1 and T2 (p < 0.001 between all CKD stages). Native T1 and T2 were the sole imaging markers independently associated with worsening CKD in patients [B = 0.125 (95% CI 0.022-0.235) and B = 0.272 (95% CI 0.164-0.374) with p = 0.019 and < 0.001 respectively]. At univariable analysis, both hs-cTnT and NT-pro BNP significantly correlated with native T1 and T2 in groups with eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR < 29 ml/min/1.73 m2 groups, with associations being stronger at lower eGFR (NT-pro BNP (log transformed, lg10): native T1 r = 0.43 and r = 0.57, native T2 r = 0.39 and r = 0.48 respectively; log-transformed hs-cTnT(lg10): native T1 r = 0.23 and r = 0.43, native T2 r = 0.38 and r = 0.58 respectively, p < 0.001 for all, p < 0.05 for interaction). On multivariable analyses, we found independent associations of native T1 with NT-pro BNP [(B = 0.308 (95% CI 0.129-0.407), p < 0.001 and B = 0.334 (95% CI 0.154-0.660), p = 0.002 for eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR < 29 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively] and of T2 with hs-cTnT [B = 0.417 (95% CI 0.219-0.650), p < 0.001 for eGFR < 29 ml/min/1.73 m2]. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate independent associations between cardiac biomarkers with imaging markers of interstitial expansion, which are CKD-group specific. Our findings indicate the role of diffuse non-ischemic tissue processes, including excess of myocardial fluid in addition to diffuse fibrosis in CKD-related adverse remodeling.
Authors: Marcello Tonelli; Natasha Wiebe; Bruce Culleton; Andrew House; Chris Rabbat; Mei Fok; Finlay McAlister; Amit X Garg Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2006-05-31 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Noreen van der Linden; Tom Cornelis; Dorien M Kimenai; Lieke J J Klinkenberg; Judith M Hilderink; Sarah Lück; Elisabeth J R Litjens; Frederique E C M Peeters; Alexander S Streng; Tobias Breidthardt; Luc J C van Loon; Otto Bekers; Jeroen P Kooman; Pål O Westermark; Christian Mueller; Steven J R Meex Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Leo H Jacobs; Jos van de Kerkhof; Alma M Mingels; Vincent W Kleijnen; Frank M van der Sande; Will K Wodzig; Jeroen P Kooman; Marja P van Dieijen-Visser Journal: Ann Clin Biochem Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 2.057
Authors: Erin D Unger; Ruth F Dubin; Rajat Deo; Vistasp Daruwalla; Julie L Friedman; Crystal Medina; Lauren Beussink; Benjamin H Freed; Sanjiv J Shah Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Piotr Ponikowski; Adriaan A Voors; Stefan D Anker; Héctor Bueno; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Volkmar Falk; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Ewa A Jankowska; Mariell Jessup; Cecilia Linde; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John T Parissis; Burkert Pieske; Jillian P Riley; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Luis M Ruilope; Frank Ruschitzka; Frans H Rutten; Peter van der Meer Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Laura C Saunders; Chris S Johns; Neil J Stewart; Charlotte J E Oram; David A Capener; Valentina O Puntmann; Charlie A Elliot; Robin C Condliffe; David G Kiely; Martin J Graves; Jim M Wild; Andy J Swift Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: O A Efremova; L A Kamyshnikova; S E Veysalov; M S Sviridova; N I Obolonkova; M A Gayvoronskaya; M Wuraola Journal: Arch Razi Inst Date: 2022-02-28
Authors: Francisco Vasques-Nóvoa; António Angélico-Gonçalves; José M G Alvarenga; João Nobrega; Rui J Cerqueira; Jennifer Mancio; Adelino F Leite-Moreira; Roberto Roncon-Albuquerque Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2022-02-11