Literature DB >> 34092181

Serosurvey in BNT162b2 vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies against authentic B.1, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, B.1.525 and P.1 SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Alberto Zani1, Francesca Caccuri1, Serena Messali1, Carlo Bonfanti1, Arnaldo Caruso1.   

Abstract

In this study, we show that BNT162b2 vaccine-elicited antibodies efficiently neutralize SARS-CoV-2 authentic viruses belonging to B.1, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, B.1.525 and P.1 lineages. Interestingly, the neutralization of B.1.1.7 and B.1.525 lineages was significantly higher, whereas the neutralization of B.1.351 and P.1 lineages was robust but significantly lower as compared to B.1 lineage. Following our findings, we consider that the BNT162b2 vaccine offers protection against the current prevailing variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BNT162b2 vaccine; SARS-CoV-2; neutralizing antibodies; variant of concern; variant of interest

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34092181      PMCID: PMC8216260          DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1940305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect        ISSN: 2222-1751            Impact factor:   7.163


Since the first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), pandemic illness has spread to millions of people globally. In response to the urgent need for COVID-19 vaccines, different candidates have been designed. Italy launched its immunization campaign at the end of December 2020 with the inoculation of the first Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike-based vaccine approved in the Country, the BNT162b2 from Pfizer [1]. Since the beginning of vaccine development, different SARS-CoV-2 variants have arisen in the United Kingdom (UK, B.1.1.7 lineage) [2], South Africa (SA, B.1.351 lineage) [2], Brasil (BR, P.1 lineage) [2], and Nigeria (NI, B.1.525 lineage; https://cov-lineages.org/global_report_B.1.525.html). All these variants are characterized by multiple mutations in their spike glycoproteins raising concern over vaccine efficacy. An important issue for spike-based vaccines is whether the authentic virus can escape vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies. To address this question, we collected and tested a panel of human sera randomly selected from 37 volunteers obtained between 10 and 20 days after the administration of the second dose of BNT162b2, which occurred three weeks after the first immunization (Table S1). All the volunteers had no history of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection, as attested by negativity for detection of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid protein (Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2, Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) showed that all sera collected contained antibodies against the spike glycoprotein receptor-binding domain (RBD) (Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S, Roche). As shown in Table S1, a broad range of reactivity profiles to RBD, ranging from 265.7 to >5000 UI/ml, were noticed. Each serum was then tested for neutralization of the wild type (B.1 lineage), UK (B.1.1.7 lineage), SA (B.1.351 lineage), BR (P.1 lineage) and NI (B.1.525 lineage) authentic viruses isolated in Italy. Neutralization was performed by cytopathic effect (CPE)-based assay [3], using viruses soon after having confirmed their identity by next-generation whole-genome sequencing (CleanPlex® SARS-CoV-2 Flex Paragon Genomics, Hayward, CA, USA). Figure S1 shows key mutations in the RBD of the viral variants under study. All the serum samples efficiently neutralized SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and all the viral variants (Figure 1). In particular, as compared with neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage, neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage and SARS-CoV-2 B.1.525 lineage was significantly higher, and neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 lineage and SARS-CoV-2 P.1 lineage was robust but significantly lower. Almost all the sera neutralized each virus at titres higher than 1:40, with only 2 sera reaching neutralization activity of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 lineage at a 1:10 and 1:20 dilution. A tendency to a better neutralization was observed in sera from younger people, as compared to the older ones, even if a statistically significant difference was reached only against the two more sensitive viruses to neutralization (B.1.1.7 and B.1.525 lineages) (Figure S2A). On the other end, a statistically significant difference in neutralizing all lineages was observed with sera collected between 10 and 14 (n = 12) than with those collected between 15 and 20 (n = 25) days after the administration of the second dose of BNT162b2 (Figure S2B).
Figure 1.

Serum neutralization of authentic SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and its viral variants. (A) SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage. (B) SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 lineage. (C) SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and SARS-CoV-2 B.1.525 lineage. (D) SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and SARS-CoV-2 P.1 lineage. Shown are the results of neutralization test with the use of 37 samples obtained from 37 volunteers between 10 and 20 days after the administration of the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine (which occurred three weeks after the first immunization). Neutralization of authentic viruses was performed by cytopathic effect (CPE)-based assay using a viral titre of 102 TCID50. The neutralization titre of the serum sample was calculated as the reciprocal of the highest dilution that protected more than 50% of cells from CPE. Sera with different neutralization titre against SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and viral variants are connected by lines. Horizontal lines and the numbers over the bars indicate geometric mean titres (GM). The I bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t-test and two-tailed P values were calculated. The statistical significance of the difference between neutralization titres in the SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and in each variant virus neutralization assay with the same serum samples are as follows: P < .0001 for SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage; P < .0001 for SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 lineage; and P < .0001 for SARS-CoV-2 B.1.525 lineage; and P = .0002 for SARS-CoV-2 P.1 lineage.

Serum neutralization of authentic SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and its viral variants. (A) SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage. (B) SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 lineage. (C) SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and SARS-CoV-2 B.1.525 lineage. (D) SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and SARS-CoV-2 P.1 lineage. Shown are the results of neutralization test with the use of 37 samples obtained from 37 volunteers between 10 and 20 days after the administration of the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine (which occurred three weeks after the first immunization). Neutralization of authentic viruses was performed by cytopathic effect (CPE)-based assay using a viral titre of 102 TCID50. The neutralization titre of the serum sample was calculated as the reciprocal of the highest dilution that protected more than 50% of cells from CPE. Sera with different neutralization titre against SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and viral variants are connected by lines. Horizontal lines and the numbers over the bars indicate geometric mean titres (GM). The I bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t-test and two-tailed P values were calculated. The statistical significance of the difference between neutralization titres in the SARS-CoV-2 B.1 lineage and in each variant virus neutralization assay with the same serum samples are as follows: P < .0001 for SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage; P < .0001 for SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 lineage; and P < .0001 for SARS-CoV-2 B.1.525 lineage; and P = .0002 for SARS-CoV-2 P.1 lineage. Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage and SARS-CoV-2 B.1.525 lineage bearing a single mutation in the RBD (N501Y or E484K) were robustly neutralized by vaccine-elicited antibodies. These mutations leading to increased RBD affinity to ACE2 are known to favour viral transmissibility [4,5], but they likely better expose this functional epitope to neutralizing antibodies. At the same time, two close mutations in the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 lineage and SARS-CoV-2 P.1 lineage (E484K + N501Y) challenged antibody neutralization, possibly due to perturbation of antigen recognition. This hypothesis is supported by recent molecular dynamic data showing that the E484K or N501Y mutations alone increase the affinity of the RBD domain for ACE2, while the combination of E484K + N501Y results in the highest degree of RBD conformational alterations [5]. Limitation of the current study is the lack of correlation between neutralizing antibody titres and protection against COVID-19 disease. Considering the capability of the BNT162b2 to elicit potent T-cell immunity against multiple variants [6], vaccine-mediated protection must be validated by data on clinical effectiveness collected in regions where SARS-CoV-2 variants are common. Click here for additional data file.
  4 in total

1.  Deep Mutational Scanning of SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain Reveals Constraints on Folding and ACE2 Binding.

Authors:  Tyler N Starr; Allison J Greaney; Sarah K Hilton; Daniel Ellis; Katharine H D Crawford; Adam S Dingens; Mary Jane Navarro; John E Bowen; M Alejandra Tortorici; Alexandra C Walls; Neil P King; David Veesler; Jesse D Bloom
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Fernando P Polack; Stephen J Thomas; Nicholas Kitchin; Judith Absalon; Alejandra Gurtman; Stephen Lockhart; John L Perez; Gonzalo Pérez Marc; Edson D Moreira; Cristiano Zerbini; Ruth Bailey; Kena A Swanson; Satrajit Roychoudhury; Kenneth Koury; Ping Li; Warren V Kalina; David Cooper; Robert W Frenck; Laura L Hammitt; Özlem Türeci; Haylene Nell; Axel Schaefer; Serhat Ünal; Dina B Tresnan; Susan Mather; Philip R Dormitzer; Uğur Şahin; Kathrin U Jansen; William C Gruber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Extremely potent human monoclonal antibodies from COVID-19 convalescent patients.

Authors:  Emanuele Andreano; Emanuele Nicastri; Ida Paciello; Piero Pileri; Noemi Manganaro; Giulia Piccini; Alessandro Manenti; Elisa Pantano; Anna Kabanova; Marco Troisi; Fabiola Vacca; Dario Cardamone; Concetta De Santi; Jonathan L Torres; Gabriel Ozorowski; Linda Benincasa; Hyesun Jang; Cecilia Di Genova; Lorenzo Depau; Jlenia Brunetti; Chiara Agrati; Maria Rosaria Capobianchi; Concetta Castilletti; Arianna Emiliozzi; Massimiliano Fabbiani; Francesca Montagnani; Luisa Bracci; Giuseppe Sautto; Ted M Ross; Emanuele Montomoli; Nigel Temperton; Andrew B Ward; Claudia Sala; Giuseppe Ippolito; Rino Rappuoli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Neutralizing Activity of BNT162b2-Elicited Serum.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Jianying Liu; Hongjie Xia; Xianwen Zhang; Camila R Fontes-Garfias; Kena A Swanson; Hui Cai; Ritu Sarkar; Wei Chen; Mark Cutler; David Cooper; Scott C Weaver; Alexander Muik; Ugur Sahin; Kathrin U Jansen; Xuping Xie; Philip R Dormitzer; Pei-Yong Shi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 91.245

  4 in total
  14 in total

1.  Comparable Post-Vaccination Decay of Neutralizing Antibody Response to Wild-Type and Delta SARS-CoV-2 Variant in Healthcare Workers Recovered from Mild or Asymptomatic Infection.

Authors:  Ilaria Vicenti; Monica Basso; Filippo Dragoni; Francesca Gatti; Renzo Scaggiante; Lia Fiaschi; Saverio G Parisi; Maurizio Zazzi
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09

2.  Different decay of antibody response and VOC sensitivity in naïve and previously infected subjects at 15 weeks following vaccination with BNT162b2.

Authors:  Gabriel Siracusano; Alessandra Ruggiero; Zeno Bisoffi; Chiara Piubelli; Luca Dalle Carbonare; Maria Teresa Valenti; Martin Mayora-Neto; Nigel Temperton; Lucia Lopalco; Donato Zipeto
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 5.531

3.  Long-term persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody responses after infection and estimates of the duration of protection.

Authors:  Eric Hy Lau; David Sc Hui; Owen Ty Tsang; Wai-Hung Chan; Mike Yw Kwan; Susan S Chiu; Samuel Ms Cheng; Ronald Lw Ko; John Kc Li; Sara Chaothai; Chi H Tsang; Leo Lm Poon; Malik Peiris
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-10-30

4.  SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 triggers a consistent cross-variant humoral and cellular response.

Authors:  D Mileto; C Fenizia; M Cutrera; G Gagliardi; A Gigantiello; A De Silvestri; A Rizzo; A Mancon; M Bianchi; F De Poli; M Cuomo; I Burgo; M Longo; S G Rimoldi; C Pagani; S Grosso; V Micheli; G Rizzardini; R Grande; M Biasin; M R Gismondo; A Lombardi
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 7.163

5.  Sex, Age, and Ethnic Background Shape Adaptive Immune Responses Induced by the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine.

Authors:  Jie Bai; Asako Chiba; Goh Murayama; Taiga Kuga; Naoto Tamura; Sachiko Miyake
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Natural SARS-CoV-2 Infection Affects Neutralizing Activity in Saliva of Vaccinees.

Authors:  Micaela Garziano; Olga Utyro; Mariacristina Poliseno; Teresa Antonia Santantonio; Irma Saulle; Sergio Strizzi; Sergio Lo Caputo; Mario Clerici; Andrea Introini; Mara Biasin
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  The association between adverse reactions and immune response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein after vaccination with BNT162b2 among healthcare workers in a single healthcare system: a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Daisuke Jubishi; Koh Okamoto; Kensuke Hamada; Takashi Ishii; Hideki Hashimoto; Takayuki Shinohara; Marie Yamashita; Yuji Wakimoto; Amato Otani; Naoko Hisasue; Mahoko Ikeda; Sohei Harada; Shu Okugawa; Kyoji Moriya; Shintaro Yanagimoto
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.526

8.  Assessing SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies after BNT162b2 Vaccination and Their Correlation with SARS-CoV-2 IgG Anti-S1, Anti-RBD and Anti-S2 Serological Titers.

Authors:  Angélica Ramos; Maria João Cardoso; Luís Ribeiro; João Tiago Guimarães
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-15

Review 9.  Potency of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV-2 variants of concern: A systematic review of in vitro studies.

Authors:  Maryam Noori; Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi; Shahnam Arshi; Kristin Carson-Chahhoud; Khalil Ansarin; Ali-Asghar Kolahi; Saeid Safiri
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 11.043

Review 10.  The Variation of SARS-CoV-2 and Advanced Research on Current Vaccines.

Authors:  Yao Jiang; Qian Wu; Peipei Song; Chongge You
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.