Literature DB >> 34091707

Is bipolar hemiarthroplasty an appropriate type of hip articulation following proximal femoral or total femoral resections for musculoskeletal malignancies?

Fevzi Saglam1, Ozgur Baysal2, Evrim Sirin2, Omer Sofulu2, Mehmet Deniz Kesimer2, Bulent Erol2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different approaches are applied for reconstruction in patients with a musculoskeletal malignancy which require a proximal femoral or total femoral resection. We aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of patients who underwent a proximal femoral or total femoral resection due to bone and soft tissue tumors and had an endoprosthetic reconstruction by a bipolar hemiarthroplasty type of hip articulation.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 133 patients who underwent a proximal femoral or total femoral endoprosthetic replacement after resection of a bone or soft tissue malignancy. There were 74 male and 59 female patients, with a mean age of 55.02 ± 16.92 years (range 11-84 years) and a median follow-up of 24.47 ± 24.45 months (range 6-164 months). Patient demographics, surgical, and oncological data were recorded. Acetabular wear was measured using the classification proposed by Baker. Functional assessment was performed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional score.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference among primary diagnostic groups in terms of gender, prosthesis type, trochanter major resection, local recurrence, complication/revision rate, and MSTS Score (p > 0.05, for each parameter). On the other hand, a statistically significant difference was detected in terms of degree of acetabular erosion among diagnostic groups (p < 0.001); the acetabular erosion rate (AER) was found to be lower in patients with metastatic carcinoma than in patients with a diagnosis of primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma. The univariable analysis revealed that the effect of age, primary diagnosis, localization, follow-up time, and presence and number of distant organ metastasis variables on AER were found to be statistically significant (p = 0.018, p = 0.035, p = 0.002, p = 0.007, p = 0.031, p = 0.040, respectively).
CONCLUSION: In patients who undergo a proximal femoral or a total femoral resection due to a musculoskeletal tumor, bipolar hemiarthroplasty is an adequate type of hip articulation method, since it does not affect the revision requirements and functional outcomes of patients with acetabular erosion.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular erosion; Bipolar hemiarthroplasty; Proximal femoral resection; Total femoral resection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34091707     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03980-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  3 in total

1.  Clinical relevance of acetabular erosion in young patients with a bipolar hip prosthesis.

Authors:  G Kiekens; J Somville; A Taminiau
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 0.500

2.  Failure of bipolar hemiarthroplasty: a retrospective review of 31 consecutive bipolar prostheses converted to total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S H Coleman; M Bansal; C N Cornell; T P Sculco
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2001-04

3.  Long-term outcome of patients with primary or secondary tumors of the proximal femur treated by bipolar modular tumor prosthesis.

Authors:  Wessam Gamal Abou Senna; Walid Atef Ebeid; Mohamed Abdel Moneim; Mostafa Saladin; Bahaa Zakarya Hasan; Ismail Tawfeek Badr; Mahmoud Abdel Karim
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.067

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.