Jenna A Zajac1, James T Cavanaugh, Teresa Baker, Cristina Colón-Semenza, Tamara R DeAngelis, Ryan P Duncan, Daniel Fulford, Michael LaValley, Timothy Nordahl, Kerri S Rawson, Marie Saint-Hilaire, Cathi A Thomas, Gammon M Earhart, Terry D Ellis. 1. Departments of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training (J.A.Z., T.B., T.R.D., T.N., T.D.E) and Occupational Therapy (D.F.), Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Physical Therapy (J.T.C.), University of New England, Portland, Maine; Department of Kinesiology (C.C.-S.), College of Agriculture, Health, and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; Program in Physical Therapy (R.P.D., K.S.R., G.M.E), Department of Neuroscience (G.M.E), and Department of Neurology (R.P.D., G.M.E), Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri; School of Public Health (M.L.), Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Neurology (M.S.-H., C.A.T.), Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Walking activity in persons with Parkinson disease (PD) is important for preventing functional decline. The contribution of walking activity to home and community mobility in PD is poorly understood. METHODS: Cross-sectional baseline data (N = 69) were analyzed from a randomized controlled PD trial. The Life-Space Assessment (LSA) quantified the extent, frequency, and independence across 5 expanding levels of home and community mobility, producing individual subscores and a total score. Two additional summed scores were used to represent mobility within (Levels 1-3) and beyond (Levels 4-5) neighborhood limits. An accelerometer measured walking activity for 7 days. Regression and correlation analyses evaluated relationships between daily steps and mobility scores. Mann-Whitney U tests secondarily compared differences in mobility scores between the active and sedentary groups. RESULTS: Walking activity contributed significantly to the summed Level 1-3 score (β = 0.001, P = 0.004) but not to the summed Level 4-5 (β = 0.001, P = 0.33) or total (β = 0.002, P = 0.07) scores. Walking activity was significantly related to Level 1 (ρ = 0.336, P = 0.005), Level 2 (ρ = 0.307, P = 0.010), and Level 3 (ρ = 0.314, P = 0.009) subscores. Only the summed Level 1-3 score (P = 0.030) was significantly different between the active and sedentary groups. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Persons with PD who demonstrated greater mobility beyond the neighborhood were not necessarily more active; walking activity contributed more so to home and neighborhood mobility. Compared with LSA total score, the Level 1-3 summed score may be a more useful participation-level measure for assessing the impact of changes in walking activity.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1 available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A349).
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Walking activity in persons with Parkinson disease (PD) is important for preventing functional decline. The contribution of walking activity to home and community mobility in PD is poorly understood. METHODS: Cross-sectional baseline data (N = 69) were analyzed from a randomized controlled PD trial. The Life-Space Assessment (LSA) quantified the extent, frequency, and independence across 5 expanding levels of home and community mobility, producing individual subscores and a total score. Two additional summed scores were used to represent mobility within (Levels 1-3) and beyond (Levels 4-5) neighborhood limits. An accelerometer measured walking activity for 7 days. Regression and correlation analyses evaluated relationships between daily steps and mobility scores. Mann-Whitney U tests secondarily compared differences in mobility scores between the active and sedentary groups. RESULTS: Walking activity contributed significantly to the summed Level 1-3 score (β = 0.001, P = 0.004) but not to the summed Level 4-5 (β = 0.001, P = 0.33) or total (β = 0.002, P = 0.07) scores. Walking activity was significantly related to Level 1 (ρ = 0.336, P = 0.005), Level 2 (ρ = 0.307, P = 0.010), and Level 3 (ρ = 0.314, P = 0.009) subscores. Only the summed Level 1-3 score (P = 0.030) was significantly different between the active and sedentary groups. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Persons with PD who demonstrated greater mobility beyond the neighborhood were not necessarily more active; walking activity contributed more so to home and neighborhood mobility. Compared with LSA total score, the Level 1-3 summed score may be a more useful participation-level measure for assessing the impact of changes in walking activity.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1 available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A349).
Authors: James T Cavanaugh; Terry D Ellis; Gammon M Earhart; Matthew P Ford; K Bo Foreman; Leland E Dibble Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: L-T Tsai; E Portegijs; M Rantakokko; A Viljanen; M Saajanaho; J Eronen; T Rantanen Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2014-12-30 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Arash Salarian; Heike Russmann; François J G Vingerhoets; Catherine Dehollain; Yves Blanc; Pierre R Burkhard; Kamiar Aminian Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: A Kuspinar; C P Verschoor; M K Beauchamp; J Dushoff; J Ma; E Amster; C Bassim; V Dal Bello-Haas; M A Gregory; J E Harris; L Letts; S E Neil-Sztramko; J Richardson; R Valaitis; B Vrkljan Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Jacki Liddle; David Ireland; Simon J McBride; Sandra G Brauer; Leanne M Hall; Hang Ding; Mohan Karunanithi; Paul W Hodges; Deborah Theodoros; Peter A Silburn; Helen J Chenery Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Mícheál Ó Breasail; Bijetri Biswas; Matthew D Smith; Md Khadimul A Mazhar; Emma Tenison; Anisha Cullen; Fiona E Lithander; Anne Roudaut; Emily J Henderson Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 3.576