PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Loss of tolerance to insulin likely contributes to the immunopathogenesis of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Several large clinical trials and smaller mechanistic studies have failed to demonstrate the efficacy of insulin antigen therapy. The growing awareness of the heterogeneity of T1D likely affects the response to various immune therapies including insulin. Identification of biomarkers of clinical response will provide further insight into mechanisms leading to the disease and classify responders in the quest for personalized therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Several biomarkers have identified subpopulations in posthoc analyses that showed benefit from oral insulin even though the placebo-controlled study was as a whole unsuccessful. High insulin autoantibody titer, low first phase insulin response, and high Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Risk Score identify at-risk relatives more likely to benefit from oral insulin. Future incorporation of human leukocyte antigen and the variable number of tandem repeats polymorphism located in the insulin gene promoter (INS VNTR) is of interest for both primary and secondary prevention studies. SUMMARY: Although primary and secondary prevention trials using oral insulin are ongoing, those completed have been largely unsuccessful. However, we believe that oral insulin should be considered in future trials as part of combination therapies as prerandomization biomarker testing is refined.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Loss of tolerance to insulin likely contributes to the immunopathogenesis of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Several large clinical trials and smaller mechanistic studies have failed to demonstrate the efficacy of insulin antigen therapy. The growing awareness of the heterogeneity of T1D likely affects the response to various immune therapies including insulin. Identification of biomarkers of clinical response will provide further insight into mechanisms leading to the disease and classify responders in the quest for personalized therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Several biomarkers have identified subpopulations in posthoc analyses that showed benefit from oral insulin even though the placebo-controlled study was as a whole unsuccessful. High insulin autoantibody titer, low first phase insulin response, and high Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Risk Score identify at-risk relatives more likely to benefit from oral insulin. Future incorporation of human leukocyte antigen and the variable number of tandem repeats polymorphism located in the insulin gene promoter (INS VNTR) is of interest for both primary and secondary prevention studies. SUMMARY: Although primary and secondary prevention trials using oral insulin are ongoing, those completed have been largely unsuccessful. However, we believe that oral insulin should be considered in future trials as part of combination therapies as prerandomization biomarker testing is refined.
Authors: Kevan C Herold; Brian N Bundy; S Alice Long; Jeffrey A Bluestone; Linda A DiMeglio; Matthew J Dufort; Stephen E Gitelman; Peter A Gottlieb; Jeffrey P Krischer; Peter S Linsley; Jennifer B Marks; Wayne Moore; Antoinette Moran; Henry Rodriguez; William E Russell; Desmond Schatz; Jay S Skyler; Eva Tsalikian; Diane K Wherrett; Anette-Gabriele Ziegler; Carla J Greenbaum Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-06-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael J Haller; Stephen E Gitelman; Peter A Gottlieb; Aaron W Michels; Stephen M Rosenthal; Jonathan J Shuster; Baiming Zou; Todd M Brusko; Maigan A Hulme; Clive H Wasserfall; Clayton E Mathews; Mark A Atkinson; Desmond A Schatz Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Kirsti Näntö-Salonen; Antti Kupila; Satu Simell; Heli Siljander; Tiina Salonsaari; Anne Hekkala; Sari Korhonen; Risto Erkkola; Jukka I Sipilä; Lotta Haavisto; Marja Siltala; Juhani Tuominen; Jari Hakalax; Heikki Hyöty; Jorma Ilonen; Riitta Veijola; Tuula Simell; Mikael Knip; Olli Simell Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-09-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: E Vandemeulebroucke; F K Gorus; K Decochez; I Weets; B Keymeulen; C De Block; J Tits; D G Pipeleers; C Mathieu Journal: Diabetes Metab Date: 2009-07-31 Impact factor: 6.041
Authors: Michael J Haller; Desmond A Schatz; Jay S Skyler; Jeffrey P Krischer; Brian N Bundy; Jessica L Miller; Mark A Atkinson; Dorothy J Becker; David Baidal; Linda A DiMeglio; Stephen E Gitelman; Robin Goland; Peter A Gottlieb; Kevan C Herold; Jennifer B Marks; Antoinette Moran; Henry Rodriguez; William Russell; Darrell M Wilson; Carla J Greenbaum Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Anette-Gabriele Ziegler; Peter Achenbach; Reinhard Berner; Kristina Casteels; Thomas Danne; Melanie Gündert; Joerg Hasford; Verena Sophia Hoffmann; Olga Kordonouri; Karin Lange; Helena Elding Larsson; Markus Lundgren; Matthew D Snape; Agnieszka Szypowska; John A Todd; Ezio Bonifacio Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Robin Assfalg; Jan Knoop; Kristi L Hoffman; Markus Pfirrmann; Jose Maria Zapardiel-Gonzalo; Anna Hofelich; Anne Eugster; Marc Weigelt; Claudia Matzke; Julia Reinhardt; Yannick Fuchs; Melanie Bunk; Andreas Weiss; Markus Hippich; Kathrin Halfter; Stefanie M Hauck; Jörg Hasford; Joseph F Petrosino; Peter Achenbach; Ezio Bonifacio; Anette-Gabriele Ziegler Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-01-30 Impact factor: 10.122