Leah Hamilton1, Corey S Davis2, Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz3, William Ponicki4, Magdalena Cerdá5. 1. New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, 180 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10016, United States; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, United States. Electronic address: leah.k.hamilton@kp.org. 2. Network for Public Health Law, 7101 York Avenue South, #270 Edina, MN 55435, United States. 3. University of California Davis, Violence Prevention Research Program, Department of Emergency Medicine UC Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95817, United States. 4. Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 2150 Shattuck Avenue Suite 601, Berkeley, CA 94704, United States. 5. New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, 180 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As of July 2018, 45 United States (US) states and the District of Columbia have enacted an overdose Good Samaritan law (GSL). These laws, which provide limited criminal immunity to individuals who request assistance during an overdose, may be of importance in the current wave of the overdose epidemic, which is driven primarily by illicit opioids including heroin and fentanyl. There are substantial differences in the structures of states' GSL laws which may impact their effectiveness. This study compared GSLs which have legal provisions protecting from arrest and laws which have more limited protections. METHODS: Using national county-level overdose mortality data from 3109 US counties, we examined the association of enactment of GSLs with protection from arrest and GSLs with more limited protections with subsequent overdose mortality between 2013 and 2018. Since GSLs are often enacted in conjunction with Naloxone Access Laws (NAL), we examined the effect of GSLs separately and in conjunction with NAL. We conducted these analyses using hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal Poisson models. RESULTS: GSLs with protections against arrest enactment in conjunction with a NAL were associated with 7% lower rates of all overdose deaths (rate ratio (RR): 0.93% Credible Interval (CI): 0.89-0.97), 10% lower rates in opioid overdose deaths (RR: 0.90; CI: 0.85-0.95) and 11% lower rates of heroin/synthetic overdose mortality (RR: 0.89; CI: 0.82-0.96) two years after enactment, compared to rates in states without these laws. Significant reductions in overdose mortality were not seen for GSLs with protections for charge or prosecution. CONCLUSION: GSLs with more expansive legal protections combined with a NAL, were associated with lower rates of overdose deaths, although these risk reductions take time to manifest. Policy makers should consider enacting and implementing more expansive GSLs with arrest protections to increase the likelihood people will contact emergency services in the event of an overdose.
BACKGROUND: As of July 2018, 45 United States (US) states and the District of Columbia have enacted an overdose Good Samaritan law (GSL). These laws, which provide limited criminal immunity to individuals who request assistance during an overdose, may be of importance in the current wave of the overdose epidemic, which is driven primarily by illicit opioids including heroin and fentanyl. There are substantial differences in the structures of states' GSL laws which may impact their effectiveness. This study compared GSLs which have legal provisions protecting from arrest and laws which have more limited protections. METHODS: Using national county-level overdose mortality data from 3109 US counties, we examined the association of enactment of GSLs with protection from arrest and GSLs with more limited protections with subsequent overdose mortality between 2013 and 2018. Since GSLs are often enacted in conjunction with Naloxone Access Laws (NAL), we examined the effect of GSLs separately and in conjunction with NAL. We conducted these analyses using hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal Poisson models. RESULTS: GSLs with protections against arrest enactment in conjunction with a NAL were associated with 7% lower rates of all overdose deaths (rate ratio (RR): 0.93% Credible Interval (CI): 0.89-0.97), 10% lower rates in opioid overdose deaths (RR: 0.90; CI: 0.85-0.95) and 11% lower rates of heroin/synthetic overdose mortality (RR: 0.89; CI: 0.82-0.96) two years after enactment, compared to rates in states without these laws. Significant reductions in overdose mortality were not seen for GSLs with protections for charge or prosecution. CONCLUSION: GSLs with more expansive legal protections combined with a NAL, were associated with lower rates of overdose deaths, although these risk reductions take time to manifest. Policy makers should consider enacting and implementing more expansive GSLs with arrest protections to increase the likelihood people will contact emergency services in the event of an overdose.
Authors: Kristin E Schneider; Ju Nyeong Park; Sean T Allen; Brian W Weir; Susan G Sherman Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Silvia S Martins; William Ponicki; Nathan Smith; Ariadne Rivera-Aguirre; Corey S Davis; David S Fink; Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia; Stephen G Henry; Brandon D L Marshall; Paul Gruenewald; Magdalena Cerdá Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2019-10-15
Authors: Magdalena Cerdá; Noa Krawczyk; Leah Hamilton; Kara E Rudolph; Samuel R Friedman; Katherine M Keyes Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Sarah S Shin; Kate LaForge; Erin Stack; Justine Pope; Gillian Leichtling; Jessica E Larsen; Judith M Leahy; Andrew Seaman; Daniel Hoover; Laura Chisholm; Christopher Blazes; Robin Baker; Mikaela Byers; Katie Branson; P Todd Korthuis Journal: Harm Reduct J Date: 2022-07-11
Authors: Madeline C Frost; Elizabeth J Austin; Maria A Corcorran; Elsa S Briggs; Czarina N Behrends; Alexa M Juarez; Noah D Frank; Elise Healy; Stephanie M Prohaska; Paul A LaKosky; Shashi N Kapadia; David C Perlman; Bruce R Schackman; Don C Des Jarlais; Emily C Williams; Sara N Glick Journal: Harm Reduct J Date: 2022-07-19