Literature DB >> 3409139

Blood pressure profile in two adult male populations.

H K Wolf1, G R Dagenais, J G Fodor, R S Fynes, S P Handa, R B Haynes, G A Klassen, M G Myers, N M Robitaille.   

Abstract

Causal blood pressure measurements were recorded in two groups of men aged 40 to 64 years; of the 7024 men in metropolitan Saint John, NB, and the 4044 men in seven suburbs of Quebec who were asked, 5840 (83.1%) and 3097 (76.6%) respectively agreed to participate. Of the Saint John group 9.0% were taking antihypertensive drugs, as compared with only 3.3% of the Quebec group (p less than 0.0001). Among the treated subjects 33% in Saint John and 53% in Quebec still had a diastolic pressure greater than 95 mm Hg (p less than 0.01). Among the participants not taking antihypertensive drugs the systolic blood pressure increased with age, but the diastolic blood pressure increased only slightly up to 55 years of age and then decreased. On average the subjects in Saint John who were not being treated had a systolic pressure 6.2 mm Hg lower and a diastolic blood pressure 3.6 mm Hg lower than their Quebec counterparts (p less than 0.0001). This difference was observed in all the age groups and was not the result of the treatment of a greater proportion of the Saint John cohort. Despite the higher blood pressures and the smaller number receiving adequate treatment in the Quebec group, the rate of death due to coronary artery disease was 10% lower than that in the Saint John group. A bias in the data from Quebec may have influenced the magnitude of the differences between the two samples, but if present it should have underestimated the blood pressures in the Quebec group and therefore not have changed the outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3409139      PMCID: PMC1268202     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  13 in total

1.  STANDARDISATION OF OBSERVERS IN BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT.

Authors:  G ROSE
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1965-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The effect of regression to the mean in epidemiologic and clinical studies.

Authors:  C E Davis
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Home blood pressure determination. Value in borderline ("labile") hypertension.

Authors:  S Julius; C N Ellis; A V Pascual; M Matice; L Hansson; S N Hunyor; L N Sandler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1974-08-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Sodium intake and blood pressure in two Polynesian populations.

Authors:  I A Prior; J G Evans; H P Harvey; F Davidson; M Lindsey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1968-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  [Prevalence of risk factors for coronary disease in the Quebec region].

Authors:  N M Robitaille; A Christen; G R Dagenais; P J Lupien; J Rochon
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 0.825

6.  Population risk of cardiovascular disease: the Minnesota Heart Survey.

Authors:  R V Luepker; D R Jacobs; R F Gillum; A R Folsom; R J Prineas; H Blackburn
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

7.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society's consensus conference on the management of mild hypertension.

Authors:  A G Logan
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Cardiovascular disease mortality in Canada.

Authors:  E S Nicholls; J Jung; J W Davies
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Home blood pressure measurements--feasibility and results compared to office measurements. The study of men born in 1913.

Authors:  L Welin; K Svärdsudd; G Tibblin
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1982

Review 10.  Non-drug treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  N M Kaplan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.