Tangjuan Li1, Yanni Xiao2. 1. School of Mathematics and Statistics Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, PR China. 2. School of Mathematics and Statistics Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, PR China. Electronic address: yxiao@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.
Abstract
During the outbreak of emerging infectious diseases, information dissemination dynamics significantly affects the individuals' psychological and behavioral changes, and consequently influences on the disease transmission. To investigate the interaction of disease transmission and information dissemination dynamics, we proposed a multi-scale model which explicitly models both the disease transmission with saturated recovery rate and information transmission to evaluate the effect of information transmission on dynamic behaviors. Considering time variation between information dissemination, epidemiological and demographic processes, we obtained a slow-fast system by reasonably introducing a sufficiently small quantity. We carefully examined the dynamics of proposed system, including existence and stability of possible equilibria and existence of backward bifurcation, by using the fast-slow theory and directly investigating the full system. We then compared the dynamics of the proposed system and the essential thresholds based on two methods, and obtained the similarity between the basic dynamical behaviors of the slow system and that of the full system. Finally, we parameterized the proposed model on the basis of the COVID-19 case data in mainland China and data related to news items, and estimated the basic reproduction number to be 3.25. Numerical analysis suggested that information transmission about COVID-19 pandemic caused by media coverage can reduce the peak size, which mitigates the transmission dynamics during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic.
During the outbreak of emerging infectious diseases, information dissemination dynamics significantly affects the individuals' psychological and behavioral changes, and consequently influences on the disease transmission. To investigate the interaction of disease transmission and information dissemination dynamics, we proposed a multi-scale model which explicitly models both the disease transmission with saturated recovery rate and information transmission to evaluate the effect of information transmission on dynamic behaviors. Considering time variation between information dissemination, epidemiological and demographic processes, we obtained a slow-fast system by reasonably introducing a sufficiently small quantity. We carefully examined the dynamics of proposed system, including existence and stability of possible equilibria and existence of backward bifurcation, by using the fast-slow theory and directly investigating the full system. We then compared the dynamics of the proposed system and the essential thresholds based on two methods, and obtained the similarity between the basic dynamical behaviors of the slow system and that of the full system. Finally, we parameterized the proposed model on the basis of the COVID-19 case data in mainland China and data related to news items, and estimated the basic reproduction number to be 3.25. Numerical analysis suggested that information transmission about COVID-19 pandemic caused by media coverage can reduce the peak size, which mitigates the transmission dynamics during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Emerging infectious diseases, including SARS(2003),H1N1(2009) and COVID-19, have always been a threat to human healths, bringing a great disaster to human survival and economic development (Crossley et al., 2020, Khardori, 2009, Smith, 2006, COV, 2020, Thompson et al., 2003). In the era of information development, the spread of infectious diseases has been accompanied by the rapid spread of information (globally/locally available information). On the one hand, the disease-related information, can make people more understand the infectious diseases, including the transmission routes, infectivity and possible prevention and control measures, so as for individuals to take effective protective measures. On the other hand, it may also cause panic and bring some social problems (Jansen et al., 2003). Therefore, the dissemination disease-related information consequently induce individuals’ behavioural changes, which greatly affects disease transmission (Schaller, 2011, Funk et al., 2010b, Frederik et al., 2016).A number of ordinary differential equation models are used to analyze the impact of individuals’ behaviour changes, such as wearing face masks, keeping social distancing, etc, in response to the dissemination disease-related information. Basically, there are two types of studies considering the transmission of the disease-related information: One is to hypothesize that behavioral changes lead to a reduction in infection rate or contact rate, such as modeling the infection rate as a function of the number of infected individuals (Cui et al., 2008b, Song and Xiao, 2017, Wang and Xiao, 2014, Xiao et al., 2015, Xiao et al., 2013, Zhang et al., 2004, Zhou et al., 2019) or number of news items (Yan et al., 2016, Song et al., 2019), where news items are considered as a separate compartment. In particular, the reduction in infection rate may be determined by the payoff gains using game theory (imitation dynamics) (Frank, 2020, Reluga and Bergstrom, 2010), and the reduction in contact rate may be induced by government shutdown policies as well as individuals’ adherence to non-pharmaceutical intervention (Pcja et al., 2021). The other is to further divide the population into two types of compartments with or without disease-related information (Amaral et al., 2021, Shannon et al., 2015, Funk et al., 2010a, Samanta and Chattopadhyay, 2014, Samanta et al., 2013, Zhao et al., 2020), and those who knowing information may subconsciously protect themselves from the disease and consequently reduce the contact rates or transmission probability. Note that the shift between the disease-aware group and disease-unaware group was modelled and determined by the payoff gains for changing behaviors or not (Amaral et al., 2021, Zhao et al., 2020). The second modelling approach actually provides a scheme of the explicit modelling the transmission of information, which inevitably increases the dimension of the system and brings much difficulties in theoretical analysis. How to nest the dynamics of information transmission dynamics to the disease transmission, and theoretically analyze the dynamical behavior remain unclear and fall with in the scope of this study.The COVID-19 pandemic has been threatening the public health and caused worrying concern amongst the public and health authorities (Cohen and Normile, 2020, Crossley et al., 2020, Winskill et al., 2020, COV, 2020). As early as the beginning of 2020 when the outbreak of COVID-19 infection was reported in Wuhan, China, massive news coverage and fast information flow significantly generated profound psychological/behavioural impacts on the public, which may influence the implementation of public interventions (Shannon et al., 2015, Xiao et al., 2015, Zhou et al., 2020). Actually, Wise et al. (2020) has testified the importance of risk perception in early interventions during large-scale pandemic. Many researchers (Amaral et al., 2021, Frank, 2020, Pcja et al., 2021, Zhao et al., 2020) also analyzed the impact of behavioral changes induced by disease-related information on COVID-19 transmission from different aspects, which all show that behavioral changes have potential to curb the transmission of COVID-19 infection. Further, Amaral et al., 2021, Frank, 2020 showed the occurrence of multiple outbreaks, which is the synergy between infection prevalence and prevalence-induced interventions and behaviour changes. These models suppose that the spread of the epidemic and transmission of information occurs at the same time scale. However, the dissemination of information among individuals is fast compared to the disease spread. Considering the very differential time scales between information dissemination and disease spread through a mathematical modeling framework falls within another scope of this study.Main purpose of this study is to propose the multi-scale model which explicitly models both the disease transmission with saturated recovery rate and information transmission, and further divide different classes based on epidemiological characteristics into two subclasses with different infection rates. Considering the very time scales between information dissemination and epidemiological and demographic processes, we introduced a sufficiently small quantity which is determined by population death rate and media wading rate, on this basis, the dynamical behaviour of the proposed model was analyzed using the theory of the slow-fast system (Cen et al., 2014, Feng et al., 2013, Feng et al., 2015). Moreover, the similarity between the basic dynamical behaviors of the slow system and that of the full system is confirmed through theoretical and numerical analyses. Finally, we parameterized the proposed model on the basis of the COVID-19 confirmed cases data in mainland China and data on news items at early period of COVID-19 infection, and estimated the transmission risk. The influence of information transmission about disease caused by media coverage on the peak size of the infection during the early stage of the COVID-19 outbreak was further investigated. We emphasize that this model is not an empirical description of the current COVID-19 evolution. Instead, this is a general theoretical framework that merges disease transmission and information dissemination in a single compartmental model and take into account of time variation between information dissemination, epidemiological and demographic process.
The model
We take a classic SIR-type model to illustrate how to model disease and information transmission. For this purpose, we divide the population into susceptible individuals , infectious individuals and removed individuals . Taking into account the transmission of information and the individual’s response to the information acquired, the population is further divided into two groups: one group is disease-unaware group , the other is disease-aware group who get information about the disease and make behavioral changes to reduce their contacts or improve protection interventions. We assume that the susceptible individuals are infected by infectious individuals with a rate of , and become infectious, and the infected individuals are recovered with a saturated function ) given the limitation of medical resources (Zhou and Cui, 2011, Xu and Liu, 2008, Cui et al., 2008a, Jinliang et al., 2012).Let the variable B be the average number of news items related to the outbreak, with which the disease-unaware individuals will become the disease-aware individuals at the rate , where represents the probability of an individual making behavior changes after receiving disease-related information, and parameter , the transmission probability that a susceptible individual becomes infected after contacting with an infected individual. The disease-aware individuals can also change to the disease-unaware individuals with rate of q. It is assumed that the changing rate of the average number of daily news items depends on the number of infected individuals with rate of , and parameter d represents the spontaneous disappearance rate of media reports(media wading rate). The model flow diagram is shown in Fig. 1
and the model equations are as follows.Here we assume that the birth balances the death with the rate of , and mortality due to disease is not considered. Therefore, , and can be considered as the corresponding population proportion. Parameters and () represent the reduction factors in transmission rate when infection occurs between disease-unaware group and disease-aware group. In particular, when a susceptible individual () is infected by an infected individual (), then the reduction factor becomes . Parameter represent the adjustment factor of the changing rate of the average number of daily news item depends on the number of aware infected individuals.
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for a SIRB model that links the disease transmission to information transmission.
Flow diagram for a SIRB model that links the disease transmission to information transmission.It is obvious that the solution of system (2.1) initiating from the non-negative data are non-negative.
Dynamical analysis
Establishment of slow-fast system
We know that awareness spreads much faster than population growth. That is, the parameters in model (2.1) have different time scales. So we can use the theory of the slow-fast system to analyze this model. We then reasonably assume that the birth (or death) rate of population, , is much less than the infection wading rate d. To reduce the number of parameters, we assume . Making , then . Letand for the sake of simplicity, the parameters of subsequent models are still recorded as the original parameters, then the system on the slow time scale (3.3) is established:Applying the transformation of time , then the system on the fast time scale (3.4) is established:
Dynamical analysis on the fast subsystem
First, we analyze the dynamical behavior of the fast subsystem. Let , system (3.4) becomes:Let , from system (3.5), we get , namely, in the sense of this fast system considering only information transmission, and R are all constants. Then, system (3.5) can be reduced to the following four-dimensional system:We can prove that this system has a unique positive equilibriumwhere . The stability of can also be proved as follows. By checking the Jacobian matrix of (3.6) at we know that the positive equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable. Considering that system (3.6) is a competitive system, the positive equilibrium is then globally asymptotically stable, and hence we have the following theorem.The positive equilibrium
of the fast subsystem
(3.6)
is globally asymptotically stable.
Dynamical analysis on the slow subsystem
Then we analyze the dynamical behavior of the slow subsystem. Similarly, let , according to system (3.3), we have:Substituting into the above system, and then the last equation of the above system is , so the B is constant in the sense of the slow system (3.3). Besides, B doesn’t appear in the other equations, so we only need consider the first three equation of this model. Dividing both sides of it by , we can get that:whereConsidering the variable does not feed back to the variables and , we only need to consider the first two equations of system (3.8):We can testify that is an attraction region of system (3.9), and this system always has disease-free equilibrium . We firstly examine the local stability of .The disease-free equilibrium
is locally asymptotically stable if
and unstable if
. The bifurcation at
is backward when
; the bifurcation at
is forward when
, that is to say when
is locally asymptotically stable if
and unstable if
, whereBy calculating the spectral radius of the next generation matrix for model (3.9), we can define and calculate the basic reproduction number .The Jacobian matrix concerned with the linearization of system (3.9) at isTherefore the eigenvalue of are and . Then, when , all eigenvalues are negative; when has a positive eigenvalue. Thus the disease-free equilibrium of system (3.9) is unstable if , and is locally asymptotically stable if .When , the Jacobian matrix at has a zero eigenvalue. Hence is a nonhyperbolic equilibrium, and the linearization cannot determine its stability. Here, we use center manifold (Andronov et al., 1973, Shim, 1991) to analyze its stability.Let and , system (3.9) is transformed towhere, and . So, the stability of of system (3.9) is equivalent to the stability of of system (3.11). After the coordinate transformation and , it becomes the standard formwhere , , and still writing it in terms of x and y just for the sake of simplicity. Algebraic calculations show thatBesides, functions and are both second differentiable in the first quadrant. According to the Center Manifold Theorem, system (3.11) has a locally -class central manifold . Since the stability of the zero solution of a system is often determined by the lower order terms, we can just consider the lower order terms of and .Expanding the functions and in the field of through Taylor expansion, and substituting them into system (3.12), we getwhere and . Similarly, is expanded asApplying the invariance of center manifold, we haveBy comparing the coefficients of the two ends of the above equation to the same power, we can get , that isSubstituting it into the first equation of system (3.13), and we havewhereSo, the bifurcation at is backward when ; the bifurcation at is forward when (Broer, 1995, Castillo-Chavez and Song, 2004), that is to say, when is locally asymptotically stable if and unstable if . This completes the proof. □
Global stability on the slow subsystem (3.8) with linear recovery term
Note that system (3.8) (or (3.9)) has high nonlinearity and it is complicated to calculate the endemic state. Given the complexity, we initially consider the special case where the recovery term is linear (i.e., ).Suppose
, the slow system
(3.9)
has a unique positive equilibrium for
, and further the unique positive equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable for
and
.When , if the slow system (3.9) has a positive equilibrium, denoted by , then we haveFrom the second equation of (3.14), we have . Substituting into the first equation of (3.14) and simplifying yieldLet , if the functions and intersect at , there is a that satisfies Eq. (3.15), that is to say, the slow system (3.9) has a positive equilibrium. Algebraic analysis shows that decreases monotonically at , and increases monotonically at and . Considering that for , and for but for , we only need to analyze the intersection of function and at . We can testify thatCombining the monotonicity of and and , we have that and have a unique intersection at [0, 1] when and have no intersection at [0, 1] when ; and when , the abscissa of the only intersection point of and is 0, i.e., , which is not positive. So that, when , if , the slow system has a unique local equilibrium , where is the only intersection of and ; if , there is no local equilibrium.To prove the stability of the unique local equilibrium , we consider a Lyapunov functionThen we haveRecalling that and , we obtainLet , we obtainfor all and . Hence, we havewhere the equality holds only when , thusFurthermore, we havefor all , because the arithmetic mean is greater then or equal to the geometric mean. Therefore, holds for . In addition, holds only when and , and is the only equilibrium of this systems on this plane. Therefore, the local equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable when and . This completes the proof. □Suppose
, the disease-free equilibrium
of system
(3.9)
is globally asymptotically stable for
, and it is unstable for
.First, according Theorem 2, we have that the disease-free equilibrium is unstable if , and is locally asymptotically stable if . Especially, when and , we have holds true, which indicates is also locally asymptotically stable for .To prove global stability of when , let’s consider a Lyapunov functionIn case of system (3.9), this Lyapumov function satisfiesSince the arithmetical mean is greater than or equal to the geometrical mean, the function is nonnegative for all . Consider the monotonicity of , then for all . So that , for all . Besides, holds only when and , and is the only equilibrium of this systems on this plane. Therefore the disease-free equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable when . This completes the proof. □It can be seen from the above analysis that when the recovery term is linear, the basic reproduction number actually act as the threshold to distinguish whether the disease dies out or not for the slow system.
Global stability on the slow subsystem (3.8) with nonlinearly saturated recovery term
When the recovery term is nonlinearly saturated, that is , with help of numerical studies we investigate the existence and stability of positive equilibrium of system (3.9) (or (3.8)). Let be a positive equilibrium of system (3.9). From system (3.9), we can obtainand is a solution of the equation for , whereThen . Let , then .When , we get . Combing , according to the zero point theorem, we get that has at least one zero point on , i.e., the slow system (3.9) has at least one endemic equilibrium.When . Denote . When , equation has no solution on , so the slow system (3.9) has no positive equilibrium. For , there must be a , such that , so and . According to the zero point theorem, has at least two zero point, one is in the interval of and the other in , i.e., the system has at least two positive equilibriums.From what has been shown above, we have the following results.When
, the slow subsystem
(3.9)
has at least two positive equilibria for
; there is no positive equilibrium for the slow subsystem
(3.9)
for
. When
, the slow subsystem
(3.9)
has at least one positive equilibrium.We numerically plot the curve of functions and with respect to I as shown in Fig. 2
. It shows that there are two intersection points of functions and , which indicates this system has two positive equilibriums, that is a case of Theorem 5 for , and . Further, we have the following dynamic behavior of the slow system in this case.
Fig. 2
(a): The curves of functions and ; (b): a partial magnification of the graph on (a), where .
When
and
, the disease-free equilibrium
is globally asymptotically stable.Let’s consider a Lyapunov functionIn the case of system (3.9), this Lyapumov function satisfiesIf , then we have for , indicating . And holds only when and . Moreover, we know that is locally asymptotically stable for , then we can get the disease-free equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable. That completes proof. □(a): The curves of functions and ; (b): a partial magnification of the graph on (a), where .To numerically show the dynamic behaviors, we plot solutions of the slow system (3.9). Fig. 3
(a) shows solutions of the slow system (3.9) for and , which illustrates that the solutions with lower initial values converge to , whereas the solutions with larger initial values converge to a positive equilibrium. Fig. 3(c) shows that if there is only one positive equilibrium for , solutions with arbitrary initial values converge to the positive equilibrium.
Fig. 3
(a): Solutions to the slow system (3.9),where and . (b): Solutions to the full system (4.16),where , the value of other parameters after parameter transformation (3.2) is the same as the value of (a), and . (c): Solutions to the slow system (3.9), where and . (d): Solutions to the full system (4.16), where , the value of other parameters after parameter transformation (3.2) is the same as the value of (c) and .
When is no longer the threshold to distinguish whether the disease dies out or not. And the slow subsystem (3.9) may occur backward bifurcation according to Theorem 2. However, , (3.10), is related to information transmission parameters, andso may decrease to below 0 by increasing or , or decreasing or q. That indicates we can increase the information transmission rate, the changing rate of the coverage number of daily news items, or decrease the adjustment factors of transmission rate, the rate of loss consciousness to avoid the occurrence of backward bifurcation.(a): Solutions to the slow system (3.9),where and . (b): Solutions to the full system (4.16),where , the value of other parameters after parameter transformation (3.2) is the same as the value of (a), and . (c): Solutions to the slow system (3.9), where and . (d): Solutions to the full system (4.16), where , the value of other parameters after parameter transformation (3.2) is the same as the value of (c) and .It is also known that the dynamics of the fast and slow subsystem are useful to gain insights into the dynamics of the full system by applying tools in perturbation theory (Fenichel, 1979, Gandolfi et al., 2015).
Dynamical analysis of the full system
In this chapter, we begin by analyzing the dynamic behaviors of the full system (2.1) and examine the similarities between these dynamic behaviors of the full system and the slow system (3.8) (or (3.9)). Since variables and are decoupled with the other five equations of model (2.1), we only need to consider the following model:We can testify that the feasible region of model (4.16) iswhich is a positively invariant set. A disease-free equilibrium is always feasible. By calculating the spectral radius of the next generation for model (4.16), we get the basic reproduction number of this model is , where is the expected number of secondary cases produced, in a completely susceptible population, by a typical infective individual (Dreessche and Watmough, 2002).Similarly we can investigate the stability of the disease-free equilibrium , the bifurcation at for , and we can also analyze the persistence of the full system (4.16) for . In the following we only give the main conclusions and the detailed proof processes are given in Appendix A.If
, the disease-free equilibrium
of system
(4.16)
is locally asymptotically stable; if
, the disease-free equilibrium
is unstable. The bifurcation at
is backward if
, and the bifurcation is forward if
, where
Further, if
, the disease-free equilibrium
of system
(4.16)
is globally asymptotically stable, where
.When
, system
(4.16)
is uniformly persistent, that is, there is a constant
, and for all initial values
, the solution of the system satisfiesIt is worthy noticing the similarity between the dynamic behaviors of the slow system (3.9) and the full system (4.16). The basic reproduction number of the full model (4.16) and of the slow model (3.9) are equivalent, because the parameters in model (3.9) are obtained by parameter transformation (3.2). On the basis of Theorem 2, Theorem 7, we can conclude that the locally stability of disease-free equilibrium of the slow subsystem (3.9) is equivalent to the locally stability of disease-free equilibrium of the full system (4.16) except the situation , where bifurcation may occur, which will be discussed later.When the recovery term is linear, the basic reproduction number actually act as the threshold to distinguish whether the disease dies out or not for the slow system and the full system on the basis of Theorem 4 and Theorem 7. When , the basic reproduction number (or ) is no longer the threshold to distinguish whether the disease dies out or not for the slow system (or the full system). The full system occurs backward bifurcation at for and on the basis of Theorem 7; the slow system occurs backward bifurcation at for and on the basis of Theorem 2. It is interesting to notice that the conditions for branching in the slow system (3.9) () and the full system (4.16) () are also equivalent on the basis of the time variation between information dissemination and epidemiological and demographic process (). Especially, is related to information transmission parameters, andandfor , so we may also decrease to below 0 by increasing or , or decreasing or q, which are similar with the situations of the slow system (3.9) on the basis of Remark 1. See Appendix B for details. Again we can increase the information transmission rate, the changing rate of the coverage number of daily news items, or decrease the adjustment factors of transmission rate, the rate of loss of consciousness to avoid the occurrence of backward bifurcation.The disease-free equilibrium of the slow system (3.9) is globally asymptotically stable for and on the basis of Theorem 6. The disease-free equilibrium of the full system (4.16) for is globally asymptotically stable on the basis of Theorem 7. It is easy to testify that if , we can conclude holds true. In fact, if , and applying the parameter transformation (3.2) on this, similarly, the parameters of subsequent models are still recorded as the original parameters, we can get , then . Since both and are monotonically decreasing in , we getDue to , we have for , which implies . However, does not necessarily mean holds true. Moreover, we only obtained the uniform persistence for , we do not know the existence of endemic states for , which indicates that we got the relatively strict/strong condition under which the disease-free equilibrium of the full system is globally asymptotically stable. This comparison implies that based on fast-slow system theory we can obtain the detailed dynamics of the slow system, which represents the dynamics of the full system, while for the full system, it is challengeable to examine the complex and rich dynamics due to high dimension. Hence, it is reasonable to examine the dynamics of the slow system rather than directly investigating the full system.Numerical simulations are used to further illustrate the similarity of dynamic behavior between the full system (4.16) and the slow system (3.9). To illustrate the existence of the backward bifurcation for the full system and the slow system, we plot solutions of the slow system and the full system with equivalent parameters for and , shown in Fig. 3(a) and (b). It shows that solutions with relatively low initial values of converge to 0, whereas solutions with relatively large initial values of converge to a similar positive level of infection proportion both for the slow system and the full system. It’s worth noting that solutions of two systems converge with very different convergent speed. In particular, solutions of the slow subsystem quickly converge to the equilibrium, while solutions of the full system slowly converge. Moreover, Fig. 3(c) and (d) show that for (or ), both solutions of the slow system and the full system converge to almost the same positive equilibrium but with very different convergent speed.
A case study
In this subsection we tried to parameterize the proposed model with surveillant data and news items data on early stage of COVID-19 infection in mainland China, and numerically investigate the media impact of COVID-19 infection. We obtained the reported cumulative number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in China from the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (Data). Although the first case was reported in December 2019, a new confirmed case was not reported until 10 January 2020, we used data from 10 January to 29 January, 2020, as shown in
Fig. 4
(a). The case data was released and analyzed anonymously. We also obtained daily weighted average number of media items from 7 major websites during January 10–29, 2020, as in Zhou et al. (2020), which is shown in Fig. 4(a).
Fig. 4
(a):The reported cumulative number of confirmed cases and the average daily number of media items from January 10 to 29. (b) and (c): Data fitting for the data from January 15 to 29, 2020. The circles in (b) and (c) represent the cumulative number of confirmed cases, the average daily number of media items, from January 10 to 29 respectively. The curves are the best fitting curves of model (4.16) to these data.
(a):The reported cumulative number of confirmed cases and the average daily number of media items from January 10 to 29. (b) and (c): Data fitting for the data from January 15 to 29, 2020. The circles in (b) and (c) represent the cumulative number of confirmed cases, the average daily number of media items, from January 10 to 29 respectively. The curves are the best fitting curves of model (4.16) to these data.In the initial stage of the epidemic, we assume that the total population is Wuhan residents, the conscious susceptible population is the isolated susceptible population, the conscious infected population is the reported confirmed population and no individual was recovered. We further assume because of the short epidemic time scale in comparison to the demographic time scale. We used the Least Square Method to fit the parameters in model (4.16) to study the effects of information transmission about disease caused by media coverage on COVID-19 infection. The fitting results are shown in Fig. 4(b) and (c), and the estimated parameter values with sources of other parameters are given in Table 1
. Based on the above-mentioned parameter estimations, we then calculated as 3.25. Note that this estimation agrees with those estimations based on likelihood-based methods (Imai et al., 2020, Li et al., 2020), while it is less than those estimated levels based on the dynamic models without considering media impact (Tang et al., 2020, Ying et al., 2020). This implicitly indicates information transmission greatly leads to the new infections decline by influencing individuals’s behaviour changes.
Table 1
Estimated initial values of variables and parameters for system (4.16).
Variables
Description
Initial value
Resource
S1(0)
Unconscious susceptible population
0.9999
LS
S2(0)
Conscious susceptible population
739/11081000
Zhou et al. (2020)
I1(0)
Unconscious infected population
1.0000×10-5
LS
I2(0)
Conscious infected population
41/11081000
Data
B
Media items
16.3
Data
Parameters
Description
Value
Resource
μ
Natural death rate/Birth rate
0
Assumed
β
Probability of transmission from I1 to S1
0.4555
LS
α
Propagation rate of consciousness
2.0981×10-5
LS
q
The rate of losing consciousness
0.0010
LS
γ
Recovery rate of infected individuals
0.1400
LS
ρ
Media reporting rate of number of infected population
5.1753×106
LS
θ
The adjustment factor of media reporting rate of number of I2
1
Assumed
d
The spontaneous disappearance rate of media reports
0.5000
LS
h
Non-negative parameter
4.9891×10-12
LS
σI
the reduction factors in transmission rate when infection occurs between I2 and S1
0.2398
LS
σS
the reduction factors in transmission rate when infection occurs between I1 and S2
0.2398
LS
Estimated initial values of variables and parameters for system (4.16).To further examine the possible impact of information transmission on disease infections, we plotted the prevalence () with different values of and , as shown in Fig. 5
and the contour plots of the peak size of the outbreak () with respect to and and q, as shown in Fig. 6
, to examine the dependence of the peak size of the infection on information transmission. Those all show that the larger or is (or the smaller q or is), the lower the peak size is. It indicates that increasing the information transmission rate (), the strengthening the intensity of media report (), or decreasing the loss rate of consciousness (q), the adjustment factor for transmission rate (), will effectively reduce the peak size. This illustrates that information transmission can mitigate the COVID-19 transmission, which calls for the importance of media coverage when facing the outbreak of emerging infectious diseases like COVID-19 pandemic.
Fig. 5
Variation in the total number of infected individuals () with parameters (a), q (b), (c) and (d), respectively. The corresponding parameter values are shown in Table 1.
Fig. 6
Contour plots of the peak size of the outbreak with respect to and p (a), and and q (b), respectively. The corresponding parameter values are shown in Table 1.
Variation in the total number of infected individuals () with parameters (a), q (b), (c) and (d), respectively. The corresponding parameter values are shown in Table 1.Contour plots of the peak size of the outbreak with respect to and p (a), and and q (b), respectively. The corresponding parameter values are shown in Table 1.Note that directly fitting the proposed model to data may induce a bias since our model does not consider the infection induced by the asymptomatic infected individuals, which were proven to be extremely important for epidemiology of COVID-19 (Amaral et al., 2021, Castro et al., 2020). We then simply extend our model by including a compartment of asymptomatic infected individuals (see detailed model equations in C) and data fitting gives the similar parameter estimations and a slightly great basic reproduction number as 3.30. This indicates that ignoring asymptomatic individuals may underestimate the COVID-19 infection. We mention here that the inclusion of asymptomatic individuals leads to a higher dimensional system, which is difficult to analyze theoretically, and we leave this for further study.
Conclusion and discussion
Media coverage has great influence on both information transmission about disease and the propagation of the infectious disease. It’s important to understand the effects of information transmission caused by the media coverage during epidemic, so as to propose public health communication strategies and disease mitigation measures. To investigate the interaction of information transmission and disease transmission, we proposed the multi-scale model which explicitly models both the disease transmission with saturated recovery rate and information transmission and used the theory of the slow-fast system to analyze this model. When the recovery term is linear, we obtained the conditions for the existence and stability of a positive equilibrium theoretically, and analysed the impact of disease transmission on the prevalence of infection through numerical simulation. When the recovery term is nonlinearly saturated, is no longer the threshold to distinguish whether an outbreak takes out or not, and our model may occur a so-called backward bifurcation.Especially, we establish slow-fast system by introducing a sufficiently small quantity (), which is determined by death rate and media wading rate, on the basis of slow dynamics of demographic process (associated with relatively small value of ) and fast dynamics of information dissemination (associated with relatively large value of d), which is more natural and reasonable compared with the method in literature (Samanta and Chattopadhyay, 2014), introducing an infinitely small quantity directly. Besides, in this paper, the dynamic behaviors of the slow system and the full system are both analyzed, which are similar, but the convergent speed towards the equilibrium is different. This indicates that, for this multi-scale model (if complicated), the basic dynamic behavior can be obtained just by simulating the slow system with data, which can save calculational costs and obtain the relatively detailed theoretical results.In this paper, through analyzing the existence and stability of positive equilibriums and the existence of backward bifurcation, we confirmed that when the recovery term is linear, the information transmission does not change the outbreak of disease, but affects the prevalence of infection; when the recovery term is nonlinearly saturated, backward bifurcation may occur, but the backward bifurcation can be avoided by controlling information transmission. Further, we parameterized the proposed model on the basis of the COVID-19 case data and data on news items in mainland China, and estimated the basic reproduction number to be 3.25. Numerical analyses suggest improving information transmission about disease induced by media coverage is an effective way to mitigate COVID-19 infection by reducing peak size during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is worth noting that although the proposed nonlinear recovery function can describe the saturated effect due to the limitation of medical resources, it may not represent the case that people would die more likely once the health care system gets overwhelmed (say SARS-CoV-2 infection in some country). We then need to extend it by further proposing the piecewise smooth function to represent, say, there is a threshold for the number of infected individuals such that saturated recovery function is feasible for , while linear recovery function is satisfied for otherwise. The piecewise smooth function will bring the difficulties in analyzing the global dynamics of the system and we leave this for future work.s