Literature DB >> 34089878

Risk factors affecting rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic repair: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Jinlong Zhao1, Minghui Luo2, Jianke Pan2, Guihong Liang2, Wenxuan Feng3, Lingfeng Zeng2, Weiyi Yang2, Jun Liu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) consistently challenges medical staff and patients, and the incidence of retear after surgery is 10%-94%. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors that cause retear after ARCR and provide theoretical guidance for clinical intervention to reduce the occurrence of postoperative rotator cuff retear.
METHODS: The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021225088). PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for observational studies on risk factors for rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic repair. Meta-analytical methods were used to determine the odds ratio or weighted mean difference of potential risk factors related to postoperative rotator cuff retear. Stata 15.1 was used to quantitatively evaluate the publication bias of the statistical results.
RESULTS: Fourteen studies from 6 countries with a total of 5693 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the risk factors for retear after rotator cuff repair were age, body mass index, diabetes, subscapularis and infraspinatus fatty infiltration, symptom duration, bone mineral density, tear length, tear width, tear size area, amount of retraction, critical shoulder angle, acromiohumeral interval, distance from the musculotendinous junction to the glenoid, operative duration, biceps procedure, and postoperative University of California Los Angeles shoulder score.
CONCLUSION: These findings can help clinical medical staff identify patients who are prone to retear early after arthroscopic repair and develop targeted prevention and treatment strategies for modifiable risk factors, which are of great significance for reducing the occurrence of rotator cuff retear after ARCR.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopic repair; meta-analysis; retear; risk factors; rotator cuff

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34089878     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

1.  Synchronization of Blood Flow Velocity in the Anterior Humeral Circumflex Artery and Reduction in Night Pain After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Case Report.

Authors:  Akihisa Watanabe; Hinako Katayama; Takahiro Machida; Takahiko Hirooka
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-25

2.  Factors Influencing the Size of a Non-Traumatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear: Focusing on Socioeconomic Factors.

Authors:  Suk-Woong Kang; Chan-Kue Park; Seung-Hun Woo; Tae-Woo Kim; Min-Hui Moon; Ji-Hee Yang; Min-Hyeok Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Critical shoulder angle does not influence retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  C J Como; J D Hughes; B P Lesniak; A Lin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Added value of combined acromiohumeral distance and critical shoulder angle measurements on conventional radiographs for the prediction of rotator cuff pathology.

Authors:  Quemars M Hamie; Florian A Huber; Vincent Grunder; Tim Finkenstaedt; Magda Marcon; Erika Ulbrich; Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2022-03-29

5.  Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A survey exploring clinical equipoise among surgical members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society.

Authors:  Bruno Mazuquin; Marcus Bateman; Alba Realpe; Steve Drew; Jonathan Rees; Chris Littlewood
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.