Literature DB >> 34089547

A non-contact device for fast screening of wound infections.

Jon Senkowsky1,2, Shuxin Li3, Ashwin Nair3, Suvra Pal4, Wenjing Hu3, Liping Tang3,5,6.   

Abstract

Screening for wound infection relies on the expertise of the provider. Clinical diagnosis of infections based on wound swab/biopsy results often takes a few days and may not assess the full wound. There is a need for a non-invasive tool that can quickly and accurately diagnose wound infection. Leukocyte esterase strips are used to identify various infectious diseases. However, it is not clear whether infected wounds also have elevated leukocyte esterase activities as compared with non-infected wounds. To achieve the objective, a device was developed to detect elevated leukocyte esterase activities in wounds by measuring wound exudates adsorbed onto wound dressings in 3 minutes. The efficacy of the device in assessing leukocyte esterase activities across various chronic wounds was tested. Such measurements were unaffected by the type of underlying wound dressing. By correlating the device outputs with clinical adjudication of infection, we found that this device had high positive predictive values for diagnosing wound infection in a wide variety of chronic wounds. In addition, a positive device output increases the probability of detecting infected wounds, while the negative device output reduces the probability of detecting infected wounds. This rapid non-contact and disposable diagnostic tool may serve as a rapid and accurate indication of infection in the chronic wound.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical study; infection; leukocyte esterase; wound diagnostics; wound dressing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34089547      PMCID: PMC8720271          DOI: 10.1111/exd.14399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Dermatol        ISSN: 0906-6705            Impact factor:   4.511


  25 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Correlation of periscreen strip results and white cell count in peritoneal dialysis peritonitis.

Authors:  Stanley Fan; Catherine Lane; Sally Punzalan
Journal:  J Ren Care       Date:  2010-06

3.  A prospective study of the microbiology of chronic venous leg ulcers to reevaluate the clinical predictive value of tissue biopsies and swabs.

Authors:  Charlotte E Davies; Katja E Hill; Robert G Newcombe; Phil Stephens; Melanie J Wilson; Keith G Harding; David W Thomas
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  Laboratory evaluation of leukocyte esterase and nitrite tests for the detection of bacteriuria.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; F P Koontz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Immune Regulation of Skin Wound Healing: Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Jacqueline Larouche; Sumit Sheoran; Kenta Maruyama; Mikaël M Martino
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Polyox and carrageenan based composite film dressing containing anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory drugs for effective wound healing.

Authors:  Joshua S Boateng; Harshavardhan V Pawar; John Tetteh
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 7.  Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): an overview.

Authors:  Satish L Deshmane; Sergey Kremlev; Shohreh Amini; Bassel E Sawaya
Journal:  J Interferon Cytokine Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.607

8.  Macrophage dysfunction impairs resolution of inflammation in the wounds of diabetic mice.

Authors:  Savita Khanna; Sabyasachi Biswas; Yingli Shang; Eric Collard; Ali Azad; Courtney Kauh; Vineet Bhasker; Gayle M Gordillo; Chandan K Sen; Sashwati Roy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Analysis of myeloperoxidase activity in wound fluids as a marker of infection.

Authors:  A Hasmann; E Wehrschuetz-Sigl; A Marold; H Wiesbauer; R Schoeftner; U Gewessler; A Kandelbauer; D Schiffer; K P Schneider; B Binder; M Schintler; G M Guebitz
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.057

Review 10.  Proteases and Delayed Wound Healing.

Authors:  Sara M McCarty; Steven L Percival
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.