Yat Hang To1,2, Koen Degeling3,4, Suzanne Kosmider5, Rachel Wong6,7,8, Margaret Lee6,5,7,8, Catherine Dunn6,9, Grace Gard6,5, Azim Jalali6,5,10, Vanessa Wong6,11, Maarten IJzerman3,4,12, Peter Gibbs6,5,13, Jeanne Tie6,9,5,13. 1. Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia. To.YatHang@mh.org.au. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. To.YatHang@mh.org.au. 3. Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 4. Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 6. Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 8. Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 9. Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 10. Department of Medical Oncology, LaTrobe Regional Hospital, Traralgon, VIC, Australia. 11. Department of Medical Oncology, Ballarat Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia. 12. Department of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 13. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Substantial adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) overtreatment for stage II colorectal cancer results in a health and financial burden. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can improve patient selection for AC by detecting micro-metastatic disease. We estimated the health economic potential of ctDNA-guided AC for stage II colorectal cancer. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis was performed to compare ctDNA-guided AC to standard of care, where 22.6% of standard of care patients and all ctDNA-positive patients (8.7% of tested patients) received AC and all ctDNA-negative patients (91.3%) did not. A third preference-sensitive ctDNA strategy was included where 6.8% of ctDNA-negative patients would receive AC. A state-transition model was populated using data from a prospective cohort study and clinical registries. Health and economic outcomes were discounted at 5% over a lifetime horizon from a 2019 Australian payer perspective. Extensive scenario and probabilistic analyses quantified model uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared to standard of care, the ctDNA and preference-sensitive ctDNA strategies increased quality-adjusted life-years by 0.20 (95% confidence interval - 0.40 to 0.81) and 0.19 (- 0.40 to 0.78), and resulted in incremental costs of AUD - 4055 (- 16,853 to 8472) and AUD - 2284 (- 14,685 to 10,116), respectively. Circulating tumour DNA remained cost effective at a willingness to pay of AUD 20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained throughout most scenario analyses in which the proportion of ctDNA-positive patients cured by AC and compliance to a ctDNA-negative test results were decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating tumour-guided AC is a potentially cost-effective strategy towards reducing overtreatment in stage II colorectal cancer. Results from ongoing randomised clinical studies will be important to reduce uncertainty in the estimates.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Substantial adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) overtreatment for stage II colorectal cancer results in a health and financial burden. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can improve patient selection for AC by detecting micro-metastatic disease. We estimated the health economic potential of ctDNA-guided AC for stage II colorectal cancer. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis was performed to compare ctDNA-guided AC to standard of care, where 22.6% of standard of care patients and all ctDNA-positive patients (8.7% of tested patients) received AC and all ctDNA-negative patients (91.3%) did not. A third preference-sensitive ctDNA strategy was included where 6.8% of ctDNA-negative patients would receive AC. A state-transition model was populated using data from a prospective cohort study and clinical registries. Health and economic outcomes were discounted at 5% over a lifetime horizon from a 2019 Australian payer perspective. Extensive scenario and probabilistic analyses quantified model uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared to standard of care, the ctDNA and preference-sensitive ctDNA strategies increased quality-adjusted life-years by 0.20 (95% confidence interval - 0.40 to 0.81) and 0.19 (- 0.40 to 0.78), and resulted in incremental costs of AUD - 4055 (- 16,853 to 8472) and AUD - 2284 (- 14,685 to 10,116), respectively. Circulating tumour DNA remained cost effective at a willingness to pay of AUD 20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained throughout most scenario analyses in which the proportion of ctDNA-positive patients cured by AC and compliance to a ctDNA-negative test results were decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating tumour-guided AC is a potentially cost-effective strategy towards reducing overtreatment in stage II colorectal cancer. Results from ongoing randomised clinical studies will be important to reduce uncertainty in the estimates.
Authors: Shelize Khakoo; Paul David Carter; Gina Brown; Nicola Valeri; Simona Picchia; Maria Antonietta Bali; Ridwan Shaikh; Thomas Jones; Ruwaida Begum; Isma Rana; Andrew Wotherspoon; Monica Terlizzo; Katharina von Loga; Eleftheria Kalaitzaki; Claire Saffery; David Watkins; Diana Tait; Ian Chau; Naureen Starling; Michael Hubank; David Cunningham Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jeanne Tie; Yuxuan Wang; Cristian Tomasetti; Lu Li; Simeon Springer; Isaac Kinde; Natalie Silliman; Mark Tacey; Hui-Li Wong; Michael Christie; Suzanne Kosmider; Iain Skinner; Rachel Wong; Malcolm Steel; Ben Tran; Jayesh Desai; Ian Jones; Andrew Haydon; Theresa Hayes; Tim J Price; Robert L Strausberg; Luis A Diaz; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Peter Gibbs Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Jeanne Tie; Joshua D Cohen; Bert Volgestein; Peter Gibbs; Yuxuan Wang; Lu Li; Michael Christie; Koen Simons; Hany Elsaleh; Suzanne Kosmider; Rachel Wong; Desmond Yip; Margaret Lee; Ben Tran; David Rangiah; Matthew Burge; David Goldstein; Madhu Singh; Iain Skinner; Ian Faragher; Matthew Croxford; Carolyn Bampton; Andrew Haydon; Ian T Jones; Christos S Karapetis; Timothy Price; Mary J Schaefer; Jeanne Ptak; Lisa Dobbyn; Natallie Silliman; Isaac Kinde; Cristian Tomasetti; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth Kinzler Journal: Gut Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Gianluca Mauri; Pietro Paolo Vitiello; Alberto Sogari; Giovanni Crisafulli; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Silvia Marsoni; Salvatore Siena; Alberto Bardelli Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 9.075
Authors: Belinda Lee; Lucy Gately; Sheau Wen Lok; Ben Tran; Margaret Lee; Rachel Wong; Ben Markman; Kate Dunn; Vanessa Wong; Matthew Loft; Azim Jalili; Angelyn Anton; Richard To; Miles Andrews; Peter Gibbs Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-08-26 Impact factor: 6.575