Literature DB >> 34088722

Prognostic Significance of Blood-Based Multi-cancer Detection in Plasma Cell-Free DNA.

Xiaoji Chen1, Zhao Dong1, Earl Hubbell1, Kathryn N Kurtzman1, Geoffrey R Oxnard2, Oliver Venn1, Collin Melton1, Christina A Clarke1, Rita Shaknovich1, Ting Ma1, Gerry Meixiong1, Michael V Seiden3, Eric A Klein4, Eric T Fung1, Minetta C Liu5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We recently reported the development of a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) targeted methylation (TM)-based sequencing approach for a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test that includes cancer signal origin prediction. Here, we evaluated the prognostic significance of cancer detection by the MCED test using longitudinal follow-up data. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: As part of a Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (CCGA) substudy, plasma cfDNA samples were sequenced using a TM approach, and machine learning classifiers predicted cancer status and cancer signal origin. Overall survival (OS) of cancer participants in the first 3 years of follow-up was evaluated in relation to cancer detection by the MCED test and clinical characteristics.
RESULTS: Cancers not detected by the MCED test had significantly better OS (P < 0.0001) than cancers detected, even after accounting for other covariates, including clinical stage and method of clinical diagnosis (i.e., standard-of-care screening or clinical presentation with signs/symptoms). Additionally, cancers not detected by the MCED test had better OS than was expected when data were adjusted for age, stage, and cancer type from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. In cancers with current screening options, the MCED test also differentiated more aggressive cancers from less aggressive cancers (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Cancer detection by the MCED test was prognostic beyond clinical stage and method of diagnosis. Cancers not detected by the MCED test had better prognosis than cancers detected and SEER-based expected survival. Cancer detection and prognosis may be linked by the underlying biological factor of tumor fraction in cfDNA. ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34088722     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  14 in total

1.  Using All Our Genomes: Blood-based Liquid Biopsies for the Early Detection of Cancer.

Authors:  Eddie Adams; Gregory D Sepich-Poore; Sandrine Miller-Montgomery; Rob Knight
Journal:  View (Beijing)       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 2.  Multimodal predictors for precision immunotherapy.

Authors:  L M Roelofsen; P Kaptein; D S Thommen
Journal:  Immunooncol Technol       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 3.  Current and Future Perspectives of Cell-Free DNA in Liquid Biopsy.

Authors:  Shicai Liu; Jinke Wang
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 2.976

Review 4.  Clonal Hematopoiesis Analyses in Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Genetic Aging Studies to Unravel Underlying Mechanisms of Age-Related Dysfunction in Humans.

Authors:  Kenneth Walsh; Nalini Raghavachari; Candace Kerr; Alexander G Bick; Steven R Cummings; Todd Druley; Cynthia E Dunbar; Giulio Genovese; Margaret A Goodell; Siddhartha Jaiswal; Jaroslaw Maciejewski; Pradeep Natarajan; Anastasia V Shindyapina; Alan R Shuldiner; Erik B Van Den Akker; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Front Aging       Date:  2022-03-08

Review 5.  Detecting Liquid Remnants of Solid Tumors: Circulating Tumor DNA Minimal Residual Disease.

Authors:  Everett J Moding; Barzin Y Nabet; Ash A Alizadeh; Maximilian Diehn
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 38.272

Review 6.  Application of Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Jialiang Yang; Yan Hui; Yanxiang Zhang; Minghui Zhang; Binbin Ji; Geng Tian; Yangqiang Guo; Min Tang; Lianxing Li; Bella Guo; Tonghui Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Early-stage multi-cancer detection using an extracellular vesicle protein-based blood test.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Hinestrosa; Razelle Kurzrock; Jean M Lewis; Nicholas J Schork; Gregor Schroeder; Ashish M Kamat; Andrew M Lowy; Ramez N Eskander; Orlando Perrera; David Searson; Kiarash Rastegar; Jake R Hughes; Victor Ortiz; Iryna Clark; Heath I Balcer; Larry Arakelyan; Robert Turner; Paul R Billings; Mark J Adler; Scott M Lippman; Rajaram Krishnan
Journal:  Commun Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-17

8.  Clinical correlates of circulating cell-free DNA tumor fraction.

Authors:  Joerg Bredno; Jafi Lipson; Oliver Venn; Alexander M Aravanis; Arash Jamshidi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  A clinician's handbook for using ctDNA throughout the patient journey.

Authors:  Samantha O Hasenleithner; Michael R Speicher
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  Can Circulating Tumor DNA Support a Successful Screening Test for Early Cancer Detection? The Grail Paradigm.

Authors:  Oscar D Pons-Belda; Amaia Fernandez-Uriarte; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.