Literature DB >> 34088362

Barriers and facilitators affecting implementation of the Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome.

Caitlin Dmitriew1, Robert Ohle2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is an uncommon, life-threatening emergency that is frequently misdiagnosed. The 2020 Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis of AAS incorporate all available evidence into four key recommendations. In order to facilitate the implementation of these recommendations, a clinical decision aid was created. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators among physicians prior to implementation of the guideline recommendations in a multicentre step wedge cluster randomized control trial.
METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with nine emergency room physicians working at five sites distributed between urban academic and rural settings. We used purposive sampling, contacting physicians until data saturation was reached. Interview questions were designed to understand potential barriers and facilitators to guideline recommendation uptake and use. Responses were analysed according to the Theoretical Domains Framework, and overarching themes describing these barriers and facilitators were identified.
RESULTS: Two themes and six subthemes encompassing 13 theoretical domains were identified. These included clinical decision-making support, awareness of the evidence, social factors, expected consequences, ability of physicians to acquire the necessary data and ease of use. A majority of interviewees anticipated that the guideline recommendations would support clinical decision making and more effectively risk-stratify patients. Other facilitators included endorsement of the guidelines by professional organizations and peers. Barriers to implementation include the fact that laboratory testing and knowledge of the rationale for its use in the investigation of AAS were not widespread. The complexity of the clinical decision aid and concerns about test specificity were also identified as potential barriers to use.
CONCLUSION: Physicians were amenable to using the AAS guideline recommendations to support clinical decision-making and to reduce resource use. A structured intervention should be developed to address the identified barriers and leverage the facilitators in order to ensure successful implementation. Our findings may have implications for the implementation of other guidelines used in emergency departments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic dissection; Emergency medicine; Theoretical domains framework

Year:  2021        PMID: 34088362     DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00160-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implement Sci Commun        ISSN: 2662-2211


  23 in total

1.  Acute aortic dissection in the ED: risk factors and predictors for missed diagnosis.

Authors:  Muiteng Chua; Irwani Ibrahim; Xinyi Neo; Vitaly Sorokin; Liang Shen; Shirley B S Ooi
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach.

Authors:  S Michie; M Johnston; C Abraham; R Lawton; D Parker; A Walker
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-02

3.  Diagnosing acute aortic syndrome: a Canadian clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Robert Ohle; Justin W Yan; Krishan Yadav; Alexis Cournoyer; David W Savage; Prasad Jetty; Rony Atoui; Bindu Bittira; Brock Wilson; Ashish Gupta; Niamh Coffey; Yvonne Callaway; Jeffrey Middaugh; Dominique Ansell; Fraser Rubens; Stephen J Bignucolo; Terena-Marie Scott; Sarah McIsaac; Eddy Lang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Diagnostic Accuracy of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-Dimer for Acute Aortic Syndromes: The ADvISED Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Peiman Nazerian; Christian Mueller; Alexandre de Matos Soeiro; Bernd A Leidel; Sibilla Anna Teresa Salvadeo; Francesca Giachino; Simone Vanni; Karin Grimm; Múcio Tavares Oliveira; Emanuele Pivetta; Enrico Lupia; Stefano Grifoni; Fulvio Morello
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection: A 20-Year Experience of Collaborative Clinical Research.

Authors:  Arturo Evangelista; Eric M Isselbacher; Eduardo Bossone; Thomas G Gleason; Marco Di Eusanio; Udo Sechtem; Marek P Ehrlich; Santi Trimarchi; Alan C Braverman; Truls Myrmel; Kevin M Harris; Stuart Hutchinson; Patrick O'Gara; Toru Suzuki; Christoph A Nienaber; Kim A Eagle
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Frequency of and inappropriate treatment of misdiagnosis of acute aortic dissection.

Authors:  Mark S Hansen; Gustavo J Nogareda; Stuart J Hutchison
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research.

Authors:  James Cane; Denise O'Connor; Susan Michie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Understanding the Canadian adult CT head rule trial: use of the theoretical domains framework for process evaluation.

Authors:  Janet A Curran; Jamie Brehaut; Andrea M Patey; Martin Osmond; Ian Stiell; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.

Authors:  Lou Atkins; Jill Francis; Rafat Islam; Denise O'Connor; Andrea Patey; Noah Ivers; Robbie Foy; Eilidh M Duncan; Heather Colquhoun; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Rebecca Lawton; Susan Michie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Barriers and facilitators to healthcare professional behaviour change in clinical trials using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a case study of a trial of individualized temperature-reduced haemodialysis.

Authors:  Justin Presseau; Brittany Mutsaers; Ahmed A Al-Jaishi; Janet Squires; Christopher W McIntyre; Amit X Garg; Manish M Sood; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  1 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators to the utilization of the intensive adherence counselling framework by healthcare providers in Uganda: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Pius Musinguzi; Josephine Nambi Najjuma; Adellah Arishaba; Eric Ochen; Racheal Ainembabazi; Fred Keizirege; Racheal Lillian Sabano; Edith K Wakida; Celestino Obua
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.908

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.