Literature DB >> 34088298

Gender- and age-related differences in the width of attached gingiva and clinical crown length in anterior teeth.

Marie-Elise Jennes1, Claudia Sachse2, Tabea Flügge3, Saskia Preissner2, Max Heiland2, Susanne Nahles2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The anatomical features of the gingiva and the clinical crowns and their interrelation, especially in aesthetically and functionally demanding areas, are important in complex dental or implant-retained prosthetic rehabilitations. This observational cross-sectional study was designed to evaluate gender- and age-related differences in the width of attached gingiva (WAG), the clinical crown length (CCL), and their interrelation in the anterior teeth to determine the relationship between the pink and white aesthetics.
METHODS: Eighty (54 females, 26 males) fully dentate Caucasian participants between the ages of 20 and 25 years and 36 probands (23 females, 13 males) between the ages of 45 and 55 years were included in the present study. The CCL of the maxillary and mandibular canines, as well as the central incisors of the maxilla and mandible, were determined with a dental sliding caliper measuring from the middle margin of the gingiva at its deepest point to the incisal edge. The clinical investigation of the WAG was performed by inserting a periodontal probe into the gingival sulcus in the middle of the buccal surface to firstly measure the probing pocket depth. The distance between the gingival margin and mucogingival junction (MGJ) was then measured with a Beerendonk sliding caliper in the middle of the labial curvature, and the clinical WAG was determined by subtraction of the measured probing depth. For the statistical analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test, the Wilcoxon-Test, the Spearman's rank correlation, and a two-factorial non-parametric analysis were used.
RESULTS: There was no correlation between the CCL and the WAG in a healthy periodontium. Gender influenced the CCL, with men having significantly longer teeth than women in both maxilla (P ≤ 0.01) and mandible (P ≤ 0.05). Age did not influence the CCL significantly neither in the upper (P = 0.06) nor in the lower jaw (P = 0.33). Gender did not show to have a significant influence on the WAG of maxilla (P = 0.69) and mandible (P = 0.26). But differences in the WAG between young and old participants were observed in both upper (P ≤ 0.01) and lower jaw (P ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The present observational study demonstrated that the mean values of cohorts with mixed age groups and genders should not be considered when attempting to determine the ideal relationships between the pink and white aesthetics since the statistical analyses showed significant differences between different age groups and genders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age-related changes; Attached gingiva; Crown length; Gender-related changes

Year:  2021        PMID: 34088298     DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01639-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Oral Health        ISSN: 1472-6831            Impact factor:   2.757


  17 in total

1.  Thickness of masticatory mucosa.

Authors:  H P Müller; N Schaller; T Eger; A Heinecke
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.728

2.  Clinical crown length changes from age 12-19 years: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  L A Morrow; J W Robbins; D L Jones; N H Wilson
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Anterior dental aesthetics: gingival perspective.

Authors:  I Ahmad
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2005-08-27       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Esthetic evaluation of natural teeth in anterior maxilla using the pink and white esthetic scores.

Authors:  Jiang Chen; Chaoyou Chiang; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.932

5.  Anatomical characteristics of gingiva. A clinical and microscopic study of the free and attached gingiva.

Authors:  J Ainamo; H Löe
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1966 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  A technique for computer plotting of clinical crown height derived from orthodontic study models.

Authors:  A Volchansky; P Cleaton-Jones; L P Fatti
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Gummy Smile Treatment: Proposal for a Novel Corrective Technique and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alberto Diaspro; Maurizio Cavallini; Patrizia Piersini; Giuseppe Sito
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.283

8.  Gingival phenotypes and their relation to age, gender and other risk factors.

Authors:  Wadhah Abdulnasser Alhajj
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Assessment of the width of attached gingiva using different methods in various age groups: A clinical study.

Authors:  Gouri Bhatia; Ashish Kumar; Manish Khatri; Mansi Bansal; Sameer Saxena
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

10.  Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location.

Authors:  Rajashri Kolte; Abhay Kolte; Aaditi Mahajan
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.